Geographical distribution of COPD prevalence in Europe, estimated by an inverse distance weighting interpolation technique

Abstract

Existing data on COPD prevalence are limited or totally lacking in many regions of Europe. The geographic information system inverse distance weighted (IDW) interpolation technique has proved to be an effective tool in spatial distribution estimation of epidemiological variables, when real data are few and widely separated. Therefore, in order to represent cartographically the prevalence of COPD in Europe, an IDW interpolation mapping was performed. The point prevalence data provided by 62 studies from 19 countries (21 from 5 Northern European countries, 11 from 3 Western European countries, 14 from 5 Central European countries, and 16 from 6 Southern European countries) were identified using validated spirometric criteria. Despite the lack of data in many areas (including all regions of the eastern part of the continent), the IDW mapping predicted the COPD prevalence in the whole territory, even in extensive areas lacking real data. Although the quality of the data obtained from some studies may have some limitations related to different confounding factors, this methodology may be a suitable tool for obtaining epidemiological estimates that can enable us to better address this major public health problem.

Keywords:

• epidemiology
• geographic information system
• GIS
• Geographic Resources Analysis Support System

Introduction

COPD is a large, growing public health problem. According to the World Health Organization, its expected burden will increase in the coming decades, mostly due to continued exposure to risk factors, population growth and aging, to become the third leading cause of death by 2030.¹

Despite being a major health problem, existing data on COPD prevalence are limited in many countries, and universally high COPD underdiagnosis² or misdiagnosis³ deprives patients and health authorities of the implementation of adequate preventive and therapeutic measures, in order to avoid its potential serious effects and high costs.⁴ In fact, of the 50 sovereign European countries, only 19 (38%) of them have available reliable data on COPD prevalence.⁵

The geographic information system (GIS) is considered a useful tool for reporting the distribution of health-related states, in particular diseases.^6,7 Specifically, the GIS inverse distance weighting (IDW) interpolation (or spatial analysis) technique (an informatics mathematical approach of manipulating spatial information to extract new information and meaning from the original data, using points with known values to estimate values at other unknown points) has proved to be an effective tool in spatial distribution estimation of epidemiological variables, when real data are few and widely separated, as might be the case with the COPD prevalence in Europe.^8–10

The objective of the present study was to apply the IDW mapping to integrate the existing data from different European areas, in order to represent cartographically the mean percentage of the population affected by COPD in each geographical region of the entire continent, both in studied areas with known data and in many other areas in which no studies have been conducted and consequently with blank data.

Methods

Source of epidemiological studies for COPD prevalence

The vast majority of the data entered in the database used in the IDW interpolation software were taken from the systematic review and meta-analysis recently published by Adeloye et al on the prevalence of COPD across the world from January 1990 to December 2014, based on a confirmed diagnosis of COPD with different formally acknowledged spirometric criteria.⁵ For the current study, only the variables referring to the place of origin of the samples and the mean COPD prevalence (in percent) of the samples composed of subjects aged ≥40 years were used.^11–63 To the initially selected 61 studies, a later one on the prevalence of COPD, as defined by the Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD), in a representative sample of northeastern Italy general population was added.⁶⁴

The application of an age selection criterion of ≥40 years excluded, from the present study, an international study that included young subjects from several cities in Europe aged between 20 and 44 years,⁶⁵ 2 studies performed in 12 Russian regions,^66,67 and another study of the Turkish region of Elazig all of them carried out in subjects from the age of 18.⁶⁸

In addition, to facilitate visual comparisons between Europe and the neighboring regions of Asia and Africa, the available COPD prevalence data from several Middle East and North Africa regions were also included.^69–77

IDW multivariate interpolation method

To elaborate colored geographical maps of COPD prevalence, an IDW interpolation process was started through the freely available software QGIS 18.9 in order to link it with the 7.3 64-bit wxPython 3 Geographic Resources Analysis Support System (GRASS).

Then, the geographical longitude and latitude coordinates of the different places were automatically obtained for each point by translating the location of the place of origin of the samples included. The translation was made through the Google Maps application programming interface using the web page of GPS Visualizer (Carleton University Library, Ottawa, ON, Canada).

Then, these geographical coordinates were imported into the database and then exported to a “csv” (comma separated value) text file, which was opened and visualized in QGIS. A shape file containing the contours of all world countries was also loaded.

Finally, the interpolation process was carried out by applying the “v.surf.idw” library included in the GRASS GIS version 7, another free and open source GIS software suite used for geospatial data management and analysis, spatial modeling, image processing, graphics and maps production, and visualization.

The v.surf.idw library provided surface interpolation from vector point data by filling out a raster matrix with interpolated values generated from a set of irregularly spaced data points, using numerical approximation (weighted averaging) techniques. The interpolated value of a cell was determined by the values of the nearby data points and the distance of the cell from those input points.

An implementation of an IDW technique, as defined by Shepard,⁷ is as follows: the way to find an interpolated value u at a given (arbitrary) point x based on N known samples u_i=u(x_i) for i=1, 2, …, N is:

$\begin{array}{l}\text{u}(\text{x})=\{\begin{array}{ll}\frac{{\displaystyle \sum }_{\text{i}=1}^{\text{N}}{\text{w}}_{\text{i}}(\text{x}){\text{u}}_{\text{i}}}{{\displaystyle \sum }_{\text{i}=1}^{\text{N}}{\text{w}}_{\text{i}}(\text{x})}\hfill & \text{ifd}(\text{x},{\text{x}}_{\text{i}})\ne 0\text{}\text{foralli}\hfill \\ {\text{u}}_{\text{i}}\hfill & \text{ifd}(\text{x},{\text{x}}_{\text{i}})=0\text{}\text{forsomei}\hfill \end{array}\hfill \\ \text{}\text{where}{\text{w}}_{\text{i}}(\text{x})=\frac{1}{\text{d}{(\text{x},{\text{x}}_{\text{i}})}^{\text{p}}}\hfill \end{array}$

The “N known samples” is the N closest ones to the interpolation point. In our study, the usual N value of 4 (N=4) was chosen. This means that a sample point takes the 4 closest pixel centers and linearly interpolates their color values according to their distance from the sample point; p is called the power parameter, which has a default value of 2, which was the value used in this study.

To express the range of values in the maps, a progressive gradient (low–high) range scale of 10 colors, creating a diverging low–mid–high color gradient, with dark blue tones representing the lowest values, yellow and green representing the intermediate ones, and brown and dark red representing the highest ones, was used.

Geographical regions of Europe

Although there is not a universally accepted definition of the boundaries and countries of the European regions, to facilitate the description of findings, we used a simple and conventional classification of the regions of Europe into 5 major subregions, namely Northern Europe, Western Europe, Central Europe, Southern Europe, and Eastern Europe.⁷⁹

Northern Europe consists approximately of the Europe regions above the 52nd parallel north, and in this geographical area, the following countries have been included for this study: Iceland, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania.

In Western Europe, the following countries have been included: the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, France, Ireland, and UK.

In Central Europe, the following countries have been included: Germany, Austria, Poland, Slovakia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovenia, and Switzerland.

In Southern Europe, the following countries have been included: Spain, Portugal, Italy, Greece, Malta, Cyprus, and Turkey.

Although there is no consensus on the precise area covered by Eastern Europe, because the term has a wide range of geopolitical, geographical, cultural, and socioeconomic connotations, the following countries have been included in this region: the Balkan Peninsula countries (Albania, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, Serbia, and Macedonia), Romania, Moldova, Bulgaria, Ukraine, Belarus, and European Russia.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to summarize study sites. Quantitative variables were expressed as mean and SD, 95% CI for the mean, and range, and they were analyzed using the analysis of variance. A p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical calculations were performed using the analytical software SPSS 19 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

The cohorts

A total of 62 studies from 19 countries (21 from 5 Northern European countries, 11 from 3 Western European countries, 14 from 5 Central European countries, and 16 from 6 Southern European countries) were selected (Tables 1–4). As mentioned previously, no prevalence data were available for any of the 12 countries from Eastern Europe.

Table 1 Mean prevalence of COPD in 21 studies from 5 Northern Europe countries

Country	Source of samples	Setting	Age (years)	Diagnosis criteria	COPD prevalence (%)	Study
Denmark	Copenhagen	Urban	63	GOLD	17	Fabricius et al^Citation11
Denmark	Copenhagen	Urban	50	GOLD	25	Maio et al^Citation12
Denmark	Aarhus and Aalborg	Mixed	65	GOLD	12	Hansen et al^Citation13
Finland	Helsinki	Urban	49	GOLD/LLN	6	Kainu et al^Citation14
Finland	Lahti	Rural	48	GOLD	9	Jyrki-Tapani et al^Citation15
Finland	Lieto	Rural	73	FEV1/FVC ≤65%	8	Isoaho et al^Citation16
Finland	Ylöjärvi	Mixed	55	GOLD	5	Kanervisto et al^Citation17
Iceland	Reykjavik	Urban	57	GOLD	18	Benediktsdóttir et al^Citation18
Norway	Hordaland county	Mixed	55	GOLD	9	Waatevik et al^Citation19
Norway	Bergen municipality	Mixed	61	GOLD	9	Hvidsten et al^Citation20
Norway	Bergen	Urban	58	GOLD	19	Buist et al^Citation21
Norway	Hordaland county	Mixed	42	GOLD	5	Bakke et al^Citation22
Norway	Bergen municipality	Mixed	46	GOLD	5	Johannessen et al^Citation23
Sweden	Uppsala	Urban	59	LLN	10	Danielsson et al^Citation24
Sweden	Lulea	Rural	61	GOLD	14	Lindberg et al^Citation25
Sweden	Lulea	Rural	49	GOLD	14	Lindberg et al^Citation26
Sweden	Norrbotten county	Rural	61	GOLD	11	Lindberg et al^Citation26
Sweden	Northern Sweden	Rural	50	BTS	10	Lindström et al^Citation27
Sweden	Stockholm	Urban	53	GOLD	20	Maio et al^Citation12
Sweden	Värmland county	Rural	45	BTS	2	Hasselgren et al^Citation28
Sweden	Örebro	Mixed	49	ATS	11	Larsson^Citation29

Note: The numerical values of age and prevalence have been rounded.

Abbreviations: ATS, American Thoracic Society; BTS, British Thoracic Society; GOLD, Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease; LLN, lower limit of normal.

Table 2 Mean prevalence of COPD in 11 studies from 3 Western Europe countries

Country	Source of samples	Setting	Age (years)	Diagnosis criteria	COPD prevalence (%)	Study
France	Paris	Urban	63	GOLD	7	Roche et al^Citation30
the Netherlands	Maastricht	Urban	59	GOLD/LLN	19	Vanfleteren et al^Citation31
the Netherlands	Rotterdam	Urban	69	GOLD	12	van Durme et al^Citation32
the Netherlands	General population of the whole country	Mixed	58	GOLD	4	Afonso et al^Citation33
UK	Birmingham	Mixed	58	GOLD	9	Jordan et al^Citation34
UK	Ashington	Urban	59	GOLD	25	Melville et al^Citation35
UK	Greater Belfast area	Mixed	55	ATS	7	Murtagh et al^Citation36
UK	Glasgow	Urban	51	GOLD	24	Maio et al^Citation12
UK	Barton-upon-Humber	Mixed	68	GOLD	10	Dickinson et al^Citation37
UK	Manchester	Mixed	64	GOLD	26	Renwick and Connolly^Citation38
UK	General population of the whole country	Mixed	56	GOLD	13	Shahab et al^Citation39

Note: The numerical values of age and prevalence have been rounded.

Abbreviations: ATS, American Thoracic Society; GOLD, Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease; LLN, lower limit of normal.

Table 3 Mean prevalence of COPD in 14 studies from 5 Central Europe countries

Country	Source of samples	Setting	Age (years)	Diagnosis criteria	COPD prevalence (%)	Study
Austria	Salzburg	Mixed	58	GOLD	17	Weiss et al^Citation40
Austria	Salzburg	Urban	59	GOLD	26	Schirnhofer et al^Citation41
Austria	Vienna	Urban	56	GOLD	20	Maio et al^Citation12
Germany	Hannover	Mixed	58	GOLD	13	Geldmacher et al^Citation42
Germany	Dusseldorf	Urban	59	GOLD	9	Gingter et al^Citation43
Germany	Munich	Urban	59	GOLD	21	Maio et al^Citation12
Germany	Berlin	Urban	41	GOLD	16	Maio et al^Citation12
Poland	Warsaw	Mixed	57	LLN	9	Bednarek et al^Citation44
Poland	Malopolska province	Mixed	56	GOLD	22	Nizankowska-Mogilnicka et al^Citation45
Poland	Warsaw	Urban	49	GOLD	11	Plywaczewski et al^Citation46
Poland	Lublin region	Rural	50	GOLD	11	Paprzycki et al^Citation47
Poland	Bytom	Mixed	59	GOLD	6	Siatkowska et al^Citation48
Slovenia	Sezana (Carso)	Urban	56	GOLD	10	Grzetic-Romcevic et al^Citation49
Switzerland	General population of the whole country	Mixed	54	GOLD	5	Bridevaux et al^Citation50

Note: The numerical values of age and prevalence have been rounded.

Abbreviations: GOLD, Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease; LLN, lower limit of normal.

Table 4 Mean prevalence of COPD in 15 studies from 6 Southern Europe countries

Country	Source of samples	Setting	Age (years)	Diagnosis criteria	COPD prevalence (%)	Study
Portugal	Lisbon	Urban	63	GOLD	14	Bárbara et al^Citation51
Portugal	General population of the whole country	Mixed	56	GOLD	9	Cardoso et al^Citation52
Portugal	Porto	Urban	58	GOLD	11	Mascarenhas et al^Citation53
Spain	Multicenter study on 11 cities	Mixed	57	GOLD	10	Miravitlles et al^Citation54
Spain	Multicenter study on 7 geographical areas	Mixed	54	ERS	9	Peña et al^Citation55
Spain	Canary Islands	Urban	55	GOLD	7	Cabrera López et al^Citation56
Italy	Po Delta area	Rural	57	GOLD	23	Viegi et al^Citation57
Italy	Verona	Mixed	56	GOLD/LLN	12	Guerriero et al^Citation64
Greece	Exochi, Thessaloniki	Mixed	52	GOLD	6	Sichletidis et al^Citation58
Greece	Thessaly region	Rural	54	GOLD	18	Minas et al^Citation59
Cyprus	General population of the whole island	Mixed	54	GOLD	5	Zachariades et al^Citation60
Turkey	Kocaeli city	Urban	56	GOLD	13	Arslan et al^Citation61
Turkey	Erzurum	Rural	55	GOLD	5	Erdogan et al^Citation62
Turkey	Malatya region	Mixed	47	ATS/ERS	7	Gunen et al^Citation63
Turkey	Adana	Mixed	54	GOLD	19	Buist et al^Citation21

Note: The numerical values of age and prevalence have been rounded.

Abbreviations: ATS, American Thoracic Society; ERS, European Respiratory Society; GOLD, Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease; LLN, lower limit of normal.

Numbers of point estimates by individual countries (from high to less) were as follows: Sweden, 8; United Kingdom, 7; Norway, 5; Finland, Germany, and Turkey, 4 each; the Netherlands, Austria, Poland, Portugal, and Spain, 3 each; Italy and Greece, 2; and other remaining countries, 1.

Accordingly, a total of 329,413 subjects from the 4 regions of Europe with published data were studied; they were distributed as follows: 39,836 in Northern Europe; 229,083 in Western Europe; 25,553 in Central Europe; and 34,941 in Southern Europe.

The size of the selected samples was significantly different in the 4 European regions, with a mean (minimum and maximal values in parentheses) of 1,897 (548–6,525) subjects in Northern Europe; 20,751 (246–185,325) in Western Europe; 1,825 (432–6,126) in Central Europe; and 2,329 (500–9,061) in Southern Europe.

Most of the studies were conducted in isolated cities or localized regions of a particular country, while only a few were carried out on samples representative of the adult general population of an entire country, such as those performed in the Netherlands,³³ UK,³⁹ Switzerland,⁵⁰ Portugal,⁵² Spain,^54,55 and Cyprus.⁶⁰

According to the study base of the samples, 23 of them were classified as urban (7 from Northern Europe, 4 from Western Europe, 7 from Central Europe, and 5 from Southern Europe), 9 (6 from Northern Europe, 1 from Central Europe, and 2 from Southern Europe) were classified as rural, and the remaining 30 were catalogued as mixed.

The mean age of the subjects from the 62 selected samples was 55.9 years (SD =6.1), without significant differences between regions (Table 5).

Table 5 Ages of selected samples, descriptive statistics

Region	Number of studies	Mean (years)	SD	95% CI (lower limit)	95% CI (upper limit)	Minimum	Maximum
Northern Europe	21	54.8	7.7	51.3	58.3	42.0	73.0
Western Europe	11	60.3	5.6	56.5	64.0	50.9	69.5
Central Europe	14	55.0	5.2	52.0	58.1	40.1	59.5
Southern Europe	16	55.2	3.2	53.5	56.9	47.5	62.8
Global	62	55.9	6.1	54.4	57.5	40.8	73.0

Note: Interregions: p=0.071, no significant differences (ANOVA).

Abbreviation: ANOVA, analysis of variance.

In 80% of the studies, the diagnosis of COPD was made by using the GOLD spirometric criteria of the postbronchodilator (post-BD) fixed ratio FEV₁/FVC <0.70; in the remaining 12 studies, other spirometric criteria (not post-BD) endorsed by different scientific societies were used, such as the lower limit of normal, the British Thoracic Society, the American Thoracic Society, and European Respiratory Society criteria.

COPD prevalence

The global mean prevalence of COPD (expressed in percent) was 12.38 (SD =6.2) without significant differences among the 4 European regions with available data (Table 6).

Table 6 COPD prevalence in Europe, descriptive statistics

Region	Number of studies	Mean prevalence (%)	SD	95% CI (lower limit)	95% CI (upper limit)	Minimum	Maximum
Northern Europe	21	11.5	5.9	8.8	14.1	2.1	25.4
Western Europe	11	14.2	8.0	8.8	19.6	3.9	26.4
Central Europe	14	14.1	6.5	10.4	17.9	5.0	26.1
Southern Europe	16	10.8	5.6	7.8	13.8	4.9	23.4
Global	62	12.4	6.2	10.8	14.0	2.1	26.4

Note: Interregions: p=0.3460, no significant differences (ANOVA).

Abbreviation: ANOVA, analysis of variance.

The highest values of prevalence were found in 2 samples from the cities of Manchester and Salzburg (26% each), followed by those of Ashington and Copenhagen (with 25% each); the COPD subjects from Glasgow, the Po Delta area of Italy, and the southern Poland region of Malopolska (with 24%, 23%, and 22%, respectively); and the COPD subjects from the metropolitan areas of Stockholm and Vienna (with 20% each).

Prevalence rates between ≥15% and ≤20% were found in the cities of Bergen and Maastricht and in the Turkish province of Adana (all with 19%), in the metropolitan areas of Reykjavik and Thessaly (both 18%), and in Berlin (with 16%).

Prevalence ranges between ≥10% and ≤15% were found in a sample from Luleå (in the northernmost county of Sweden) with 14%, followed by 2 samples from Barton-upon-Humber (England) and Hannover (Germany) both with 13% and the patients’ samples from the Danish cities of Aarhus and Aalborg and the Dutch city of Rotterdam (with 12%). Prevalence value of 11% was found in Warsaw, in the Polish region of Lublin, and in the Swedish counties of Norrbotten and Örebro. Prevalence values slightly >10% were found in Slovenia, Spain, and Portugal and in the general population of the UK.

In practically all of the remaining places with available data, prevalence ranged from 5 to <10%. Anecdotally, a young rural cohort, with a mean age of 45 years, from the Swedish county of Värmland showed the lowest prevalence of COPD in Europe, with a percentage slightly >2%.

IDW interpolation maps

In the IDW interpolation map of Figure 1, the prevalence rates of COPD of all European countries are represented by a red–blue scale. Black spots indicate the places of origin of the samples.

Figure 1 COPD mean prevalence in Europe.

Notes: In this IDW interpolation map, the COPD prevalence is represented by a red–blue scale. Black spots indicate the places of origin of the data obtained from 62 selected studies. Some black spots are also shown in some nearby countries of North Africa and Middle East for guidance.
Abbreviation: IDW, inverse distance weighting.

In a simplified way, since there is no exact equivalence between the qualitative data provided by the color scale and the quantitative ones provided by the numerical values, it can be interpreted with reasonable certainty that red tones represent the maximum values >20%; brown and orange colors symbolize high but lower values of ~15%–20%; shades of yellow and green tones represent intermediate values of ~10%–15%; and blue tones represent minimal values of 0%–5%.

The greatest numbers of black spots are located in the Iberian Peninsula, Great Britain, Central Europe, and the coastal regions bordering the North and the Baltic Seas. In contrast, spots are in general scattered and scanty in most of the remaining parts of the continent and absolutely absent in the Mediterranean islands of Corsica, Sardinia, Sicily and Greek islands, southern Italy, Balkan Peninsula, and regions belonging to Eastern Europe.

Some black spots can also be seen in some nearby countries of North Africa and Middle East (for guidance).

In Figure 2, the numerical values of the corresponding prevalence rates have been added. The numerical values appear with a decimal and are the same reproduced (rounded) in Tables 1–4.

Figure 2 COPD mean prevalence in Europe.

Note: The IDW interpolation map shows the prevalence values of COPD at the points of origin of the patients, both in Europe and in some neighboring countries in North Africa and the Middle East.
Abbreviation: IDW, inverse distance weighting.

In the map of Figure 3, both black spots and numerical figures have been removed to allow a clearer view of the colors with which the different regions were colored.

Figure 3 COPD mean prevalence in Europe.

Notes: In this IDW interpolation map, spots and numerical values have been removed to allow a clearer view of the colors with which the different regions appear colored. Although there is not an exact equivalence between the qualitative data provided by the color scale and the numerical values obtained from published studies, there is an approximate correlation between them, which allows interpreting findings of the mapping with reasonable certainty.
Abbreviation: IDW, inverse distance weighting.

A very high prevalence represented by red tones (≈20%–27%) appears in practically all Great Britain, except in the south of the island that presents brownish colors in the west and yellow in the center and east consistent with an intermediate prevalence. Reddish colors, indicative of a very high prevalence, are also shown in the southeast of the Scandinavian Peninsula, the Island of Amager (Denmark), southeast of Germany, western and southern Poland, Austria, Czech Republic, and Slovakia (these last 2 countries without studies and therefore without real numerical values).

Brown and orange tones (approximately equivalent to a range of numerical values between 15% and 20%) appear in Iceland, Hungary, large areas of Italy (except the regions of Lombardy, Piedmont, Liguria, and Calabria, which appear in yellow color), Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, and Greece, as well as in the province of Adana (southern Turkey). Of note, there are no real numerical values for the Balkan countries that were colored by means of the IDW mapping.

Most of the remaining regions of Europe are stained in yellow and green colors, indicative of an intermediate prevalence of ~10%–15%; the Danish peninsula of Jutland, most of Sweden, Norway, and northern Finland, the Baltic seacoast countries and the Baltic islands of Gotland and Aland, Belorussia, most of the lands of Poland, the western half of Germany, the coastal regions of Western Europe and Great Britain bordering the North Sea and the English Channel, Ireland, Portugal, Spain, the Mediterranean major islands, Slovenia, Ukraine, Romania, Bulgaria, European Russia, Montenegro, Albania, Macedonia, and the Anatolian Peninsula are included in this group. Remarkably, many of these regions were stained by IDW interpolation in the absence of real numerical data.

Blue areas (indicative of the prevalence of around or <5%) are scarce and isolated; Switzerland, the island of Cyprus, some cities of Spain, such as Vigo, Burgos, Cáceres, and Seville, scattered areas of the Scandinavian peninsula and Finland, and the Erzurum Province of eastern Turkey are among them.

Discussion

Existing data on COPD prevalence are in general insufficient and irregularly distributed in many regions of Europe, in some of which there is a striking scarcity or even an absolute lack of epidemiological information about this important health issue.

To assess the COPD prevalence throughout the European continent and its surrounding islands, an efficient method of proven utility, known as IDW multivariate interpolation (or spatial analysis), which is usually applied to various disciplines concerned with the earth’s surface, such as cartography, geography, hydrology, climatology, and agriculture, was used in the present study in order to generate a continuous map of COPD prevalence.

Basically, IDW interpolation uses data points with known values to estimate other values at unknown locations, in order to create a raster surface consisting of an array of cells (pixels) arranged in rows and columns (or a grid) in which each cell contains a value representing some prevalence information, finally covering a whole area. The IDW method is based on the assumption that the attribute value of an unsampled point is the weighted average of known values within the 4 nearest data points. IDW assumes that each measured point has a local influence that diminishes with distance, weighting the points closer to the prediction location greater than those located farther away, which means that weights are inversely related to the distances between the sampled locations and the predicted ones.⁷

The IDW interpolation is a simple and intuitive method, easy to handle and interpret, relatively fast for calculations, and easy to compute, which also has the advantage of allowing to easily renewing the database, with a flexibility of the inclusion of studies newly identified, that are more recent, or with a better study design. Similar flexibility applies to the exclusion of others of less scientific quality to automatically reconstructing new, updated maps. In addition, IDW has a mathematical precision that makes it always exact, but this advantage can be a disadvantage if the actual data were erroneous or inaccurate. Since it works automatically creating new points from others supposedly accurate, it is crucial to introduce reliable data; otherwise the final results will also be inaccurate or erroneous.

For the present study, the numerical data of prevalence rates were obtained with the best available evidence in publicly accessible scientific databases, and only surveys constituted by patients of at least ≥40 years of age and a confirmed diagnosis of COPD with spirometry were selected for the analysis.

Limitations

However, the authors of the present study are aware that the analysis may have some limitations due to a number of confounding factors frequently associated with cross-sectional studies, and sometimes these confounding variables could have led to spurious associations. For example, the sampling approach varied from study to study or even among sites in the same study. In addition, the size of the samples was highly variable, with significant differences between regions, and some of them were not proportional to the general population of the studied region. Remarkably, the lack or scarcity of data in extensive regions of Europe makes the scientific hypotheses from which some conclusions were drawn less reliable.

There are also some (though not statistically significant) differences in the age distribution between regions of Europe and even within the same region of the same country, and since in spirometry-based studies the prevalence of COPD increases with age, the lack of homogeneity in this variable may be the reason for some of the erratic values.

On the other hand, when modeling relative risks or ORs from data obtained from a given population, results may not be applicable to populations with different levels of exposure, as the relations may not be linear across all exposure levels. Regrettably, in our study, there was no proportionality between the number of urban and rural cohorts, and thus, studies performed in populations with high levels of smoking or occupational air pollutants exposure may not be generalizable to those of populations with lower levels of exposure.

Another limitation may be related to the differences in case definitions. The definition based on post-BD FEV₁/FVC <0.70 was used in the large majority (80%) of studies, but this still does not address all possible sources of variation in case definition, since this fixed ratio criterion may potentially overdiagnose COPD in the elderly and it may underdiagnose COPD in younger patients. Besides, a number of technical issues could have affected the estimates, such as the quality of the commercial models of the spirometers used, the level of training of the operators, and the process of collection and storage of spirometry measurements.^2–5

Finally, an intrinsic limitation of GIS is that geographic proximity does not take into account borders, which often within Europe mirror a different language or dialect. Common language is a well-established factor for unevenly distributing genes, related to or not to health, and many other social determinants.⁷⁸

Nevertheless, in spite of all these criticisms, it should be emphasized that GIS unquestionably offers a useful new tool in epidemiology, which makes it ever easier to connect spatially referenced physical and social phenomena to population patterns of health, disease, and well-being.

Therefore, in our opinion, the easy-to-interpret and eye-catching impacting results of this technique may contribute to enhancing public health surveillance as well as delineating the prevalence of COPD in Europe and in other countries; to increase the number of doctors who treat this type of patients and the health authorities and national governments’ interest in strengthening regulations to address occupational and environmental risk factors, regulate tobacco use, and improve public awareness; to all together increase the rate of diagnoses and to implement the application of preventive and therapeutic measures to avoid potential side effects and unnecessary costs; and to reduce the high global COPD burden in coming years.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.