Factors associated with good self-rated health and quality of life in subjects with self-reported COPD

Abstract

Background

Recent guidelines for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) state that COPD is both preventable and treatable. To gain a more positive outlook on the disease it is interesting to investigate factors associated with good, self-rated health and quality of life in subjects with self-reported COPD in the population.

Methods

In a cross-sectional study design, postal survey questionnaires were sent to a stratified, random population in Sweden in 2004 and 2008. The prevalence of subjects (40–84 years) who reported having COPD was 2.1% in 2004 and 2.7% in 2008. Data were analyzed for 1475 subjects. Regression models were used to analyze the associations between health measures (general health status, the General Health Questionnaire, the EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire) and influencing factors.

Results

The most important factor associated with good, self-rated health and quality of life was level of physical activity. Odds ratios for general health varied from 2.4 to 7.7 depending on degree of physical activity, where subjects with the highest physical activity level reported the best health and also highest quality of life. Social support and absence of economic problems almost doubled the odds ratios for better health and quality of life.

Conclusions

In this population-based public health survey, better self-rated health status and quality of life in subjects with self-reported COPD was associated with higher levels of physical activity, social support, and absence of economic problems. The findings indicated that of possible factors that could be influenced, promoting physical activity and strengthening social support are important in maintaining or improving the health and quality of life in subjects with COPD. Severity of the disease as a possible confounding effect should be investigated in future population studies.

Keywords:

• chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
• health status
• physical activity
• quality of life
• social support

Introduction

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major public health problem in persons over 40.¹ Further increases in the prevalence and mortality of COPD can be expected over the coming decades.² People in general had little knowledge about the disease,³ but during the last decade COPD has become a widely recognized disease entity. Those with self-reported COPD in the adult population can now be identified and questioned about their health status and quality of life.

The World Health Organization (WHO) (1948) defines health as “a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity”. In later years, a salutogenic approach focusing on factors supporting health and well-being has successively been introduced⁴ and was supported by the WHO Ottawa Charter of 1986,⁵ which advocated a reorientation of health services towards the promotion of health. Knowledge about predictors of good health can support health-promoting activities among individuals with chronic disorders.⁶ Thus, a health-promoting society for healthy people as well as for those with chronic diseases could be created, both at societal and individual levels.⁷

We have previously shown that subjects with chronic disease have a low general health status and a low level of physical activity compared with healthy subjects.⁸ Subjects with COPD are particularly restricted in their activities. Patients with COPD can be impaired in all domains of health-related quality of life⁹ and depression in patients with COPD seems associated with poor exercise performance and lower health status.¹⁰ Studies often focus on risk factors and negative aspects, with a focus on ill-health,¹¹ while determinants of good health have been studied less extensively.¹²

Recent guidelines for COPD state that COPD is both preventable and treatable.² In addition, the importance of increasing awareness of COPD, to promote a healthy lifestyle and encourage physical activity in all patients with COPD has been emphasized.¹³ Therefore, investigating factors associated with good health in subjects with COPD is of great interest.

The aim of this study was to investigate factors associated with good, self-rated health and quality of life in subjects with self-reported COPD.

Study population and methods

Study population

Two population surveys including men and women were performed in 2004 and 2008. Data were obtained in August–November 2004 and March–April 2008 using a postal survey questionnaire in Swedish. The area investigated covered 55 municipalities in five counties in central Sweden with approximately one million inhabitants. The sampling was random after stratification for gender, age group, county, and municipality. Data collection was completed after two postal reminders.

In the studied subsample of the present study (age group 40–84 years) the questionnaire was sent to 45,657 persons (2004) and 45,959 persons (2008) (Figure 1). A total of 31,606 (2004) and 30,582 (2008) persons answered the questionnaire with a response rate of 69.2% (2004) and 66.5% (2008). All subjects who answered “Yes, COPD” to the question “Have you or have you had any of the following longstanding diseases or problems during the past 12 months”, were included (Table 1). The prevalence of subjects who stated having COPD in the sample was 2.1% in 2004 and 2.7% in 2008. Due to the low reported prevalence of COPD, the results from the two surveys were combined to obtain a larger population for analysis. The probability of the same person answering both surveys was 2.4% and this possible overlap was assessed as not influencing results.

Table 1 Characteristics of the subjects (n = 1475)

	Combined 2004 + 2008 n = 1 475	2004 n = 664	2008 n = 811	P value
Age (years)	69.1 (9.7)	68.9 (9.8)	69.3 (9.6)	0.25
Female sex (%)	46.0	43.8	47.8	0.06
BMI (kg/m^2)	26.1 (5.0)	25.9 (4.7)	26.3 (5.3)	0.10
Economic problems (%)	15.0	16.1	14.1	0.296
Alcohol use the past 12 months (%)				0.678
2–4 times a month or more	48.7	48.1	49.2
Once a month or less/never	51.3	51.9	50.8
Educational level (%)				0.001
Compulsory school	57.3	67.8	54.7
Grammar school	16.1	13.2	18.5
University	12.3	11.1	13.3
Other	10.9	7.8	13.4
Social support (%)				0.422
No	9.1	9.1	9.1
Yes, probably	26.3	27.9	24.9
Yes, certainly	64.6	63.0	66.0
Smoking status (%)				0.179
Never smokers	12.3	13.6	11.2
Ex-smokers	54.6	52.2	56.6
Current smokers	33.1	34.2	32.2
Physical activity (%)				0.828
Sedentary	39.3	40.5	38.3
Moderate exercise (low activity)	43.7	43.4	44.0
Moderate regular exercise	11.4	10.8	11.9
Regular exercise and training	5.6	5.3	5.8
Employment status (%)				0.423
Employed or studying	17.1	15.6	18.3
Sick leave or sickness pension	13.6	13.7	13.6
Retired	69.3	70.7	68.1
Comorbidity factors (%)
Cardiovascular disease	33.8	35.5	32.5	0.11
Hypertension	45.3	44.9	45.5	0.41
Asthma	42.8	45.9	40.3	0.02
Depression	26.2	27.3	25.3	0.19
Chronic fatigue syndrome	21.8	23.3	20.6	0.11

Notes: Economic problems, difficulty in managing current expenditure during the past 12 months. Data are presented as mean (standard deviation) or percentage. Differences were calculated for 2004–2008 using t-test, for age and BMI. Differences between ordinal variables were tested using a chi-square test.

Abbreviation: BMI, body mass index.

Figure 1 Selection of the population surveyed.

Abbreviation: COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Methods

The factors associated with health status and quality of life in those with self-reported COPD were analyzed.

Outcome variables – health status and quality of life

General health status was assessed by the answer to the question “How do you rate your general health status?” with the alternatives; “Very good/Good/Neither good nor poor/Poor/Very poor”.¹⁴

The General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) is a self-reported questionnaire designed to identify psychological disorders, mainly within the anxiety/depression spectrum. In the present study the 12-item version (GHQ12) was used.¹⁵ Scores were calculated from dichotomizing the 12 items (0 = equal or better than usual, 1 = worse than usual), and psychological distress was defined as present when the total score was 3 or higher.

The EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D), consists of the five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, each of which offered three possible responses: “No problems/Some or moderate problems/Extreme problems”. The index of EQ-5D was computed according to Burström et al,¹⁶ (1 = full health, 0 = death).

The factors potentially associated with outcome variables were: age and sex, which are basic factors in all models. In regression analyses, age and body mass index (BMI; body weight divided by the square of height) are standardized.

Economic problems were described by answers to the question: “Have you had difficulties in managing expenditures for food, rent, bills, etc. during the past 12 months?” with the alternatives: “No” or “Yes, 1 month/Yes, 2 months/Yes, 3–5 months/Yes, 6–12 months”; all Yes-alternatives were classified as “Yes”.

Alcohol use was categorized by five categories: “Never/Once a month or less/2–4 times a month/2–3 times a week/4 times a week or more”. Educational level was combined into the categories: “Compulsory school/Grammar school/University/Other”.

Social support was assessed according to the question: “Do you have any persons in your vicinity who can provide you with personal support in case of personal problems or life crises?” with the alternatives: “Yes, undoubtedly/Yes, probably/Presumably not/No”; where “No” and “Presumably not” were classified as “No”.

Smoking status contained four alternatives: “Never smoked/Stopped smoking (ex-smoker)/Intermittent smoker/Daily smoker”. The latter two alternatives were combined to “Current smoker”.

Physical activity in leisure time was estimated on a four-category scale indicating (A) sedentary (mostly sitting or low activity <2 hours a week); (B) moderate exercise (low activity >2 hours a week); (C) moderate regular exercise (high activity >30 minutes, 1–2 times a week); (D) regular exercise and training (high activity >30 minutes ≥3 times a week).

Health care utilization was indicated by a “Yes” response to the question: “Have you, due to symptoms or disease, visited a doctor in a hospital emergency department during the past three months?” or “Have you, due to symptoms or disease, been admitted to a hospital during the past three months?”

Comorbidity factors

Comorbidities often associated with COPD were captured by “Yes” answers to the question about presence of longstanding diseases or problems in the last 12 months. These diseases or problems were cardiovascular disease, hypertension, asthma, depression, and chronic fatigue syndrome.

Statistical methods

For descriptive analysis we used means, standard deviations, and proportions along with t-tests and chi-square tests for associations. Regression models were used to analyze the association between health measures (general health status, GHQ12 index, EQ-5D) and a predefined set of explanatory variables. These are added in two blocks for each health measure: block 1 – sex, age, and additional factors (BMI, economic problems, alcohol use, educational level, social support, smoking status, and physical activity), and block 2 – comorbidity factors (cardiovascular disease, hypertension, asthma, depression, and chronic fatigue syndrome). Because there are correlations between comorbidities they are added one at a time in separate analyses. The purpose of block 2 is to see whether comorbidity has any influence on the associations between explanatory variables and outcome.

For GHQ12 we used logistic regression, with odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). For general health we tested the proportional odds assumption in ordinal logistic regression and, when necessary, used partial proportional odds or multinomial regression models instead. All regression analyses for general health were made using the Stata command gologit2,¹⁷ with automatic testing of the proportional odds assumption both globally and for each variable respectively. For EQ-5D we tested the normal assumption of linear regression. Because the data showed significant deviations, we used median regression instead.¹⁸

Nonlinear effects of age and BMI were tested using multivariate fractional polynomials (FP).¹⁹ The estimation routine for fractional polynomials starts with a linear regression model and is expanded when indicated by data, resulting in a parsimonious model still complex enough to describe associations present in data. Associations were measured using odds ratios with 95% CI.

All analyses were performed using Stata/IC (v 10; Stata Corp LP, College Station, TX).

Ethics

According to the Swedish laws of medical research ethics, population studies with de-identified personal data do not require ethical approval. The reasoning behind this is that the respondent gave consent when returning the questionnaire.

Results

The mean age was 69.1 years (females 67.0 and males 69.9 years), and more men than women had self-reported COPD (Table 1). One-third were current smokers, and 28% of all subjects were daily smokers. A total of 83% reported physical activity on the two lowest levels, and a sedentary lifestyle was stated by 39%. There was no difference in reported physical activity between the years 2004 and 2008. Compulsory school was the highest educational level in 57% and more than 84% were retired, on sick leave, or had a sickness pension. Comorbidity was present with cardiovascular disease in 34%, hypertension, or asthma in more than 40%, depression in 26%, and chronic fatigue syndrome in 22%. More than 23% had visited an emergency department during the past 3 months, compared with 8%–9% in age-matched subjects without COPD, and 14% had been admitted to hospital.

General health status was reported as “very good/good” in 24% (Table 2) and psychological well-being was not impaired in 77%. Quality of life (EQ-5D) was graded as “no problems” by half the subjects regarding mobility and anxiety/depression, while 14% had “no problems” with pain/discomfort, and more than 60% had “no problems” with usual activities. A slightly better status on the health and quality of life measures could be seen in 2008 compared with 2004 (Table 2). Unadjusted relations between self-reported health status and level of physical activity are described in Figure 2.

Table 2 General health and quality of life (n = 1 475)

	Combined 2004 + 2008 n = 1 475	2004 n = 664	2008 n = 811	P value
General health status (%)				0.038
Very good	1.7	1.5	1.9
Good	22.0	19.5	24.1
Neither good nor poor	43.9	44.8	43.3
Poor	28.1	28.5	27.8
Very poor	4.2	5.7	3.0
GHQ12; not impaired psychological well-being (%)	76.7	74.5	78.5	0.04
EQ-5D index value [0–1]	0.63 (0.27)	0.61 (0.28)	0.65 (0.26)	0.002
EQ-5D no problems (%)
Mobility	48.6	46.9	50.1	0.11
Self-care	89.8	88.5	90.8	0.08
Usual activities	61.3	58.6	63.5	0.03
Pain/discomfort	13.6	12.4	14.5	0.12
Anxiety/depression	49.4	47.3	51.1	0.07

Notes: Differences for 2004–2008 were tested using t test for EQ-5D. Differences between proportions were tested using the asymptotic normal test for binomial data. The difference in general health was tested with a chi-square test.

Abbreviations: GHQ12, General Health Questionnaire 12-item version, impaired well-being defined as present when the total score was 3 or higher; EQ-5D, EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire, index value (standard deviation): [1 = full health, 0 = death].

Figure 2 Relationship between self-rated general health (x-axis) and physical activity in leisure time.

The regression analyses of self-reported general health diagnostic tests showed deviations from the proportional odds assumption for some variables (age, economic problems, alcohol use, and smoking status) and, as a consequence, partial proportional odds models were used. The heterogeneous associations for these four variables are described in Table 3 as four odds ratios (odds comparing “Very bad” vs “Bad”, “Bad” vs “Neither good nor bad”, “Neither good nor bad” vs “Good”, and “Good” vs “Very good”) for each variable. These odds ratios were interpreted as ordinary odds ratios where, for example, the reference outcome was “Neither good nor bad” the other was “Good”. Tests of nonlinear effects for age and BMI only showed significant nonlinear associations for age in the analysis of GHQ12.

Table 3 Associations between background factors and measures of general health and quality of life

	General health OR (95% CI)	GHQ12 OR (95% CI)	EQ-5D Effect on median (95% CI)
Age (standardized)		FP U-shaped, minimum at 68 years	−0.008 (−0.018, 0.001)
Bad vs very bad	1.147 (0.850, 1.547)
Bad/neither good nor bad vs bad	1.095 (0.945, 1.269)
Good vs neither good nor bad	0.828 (0.711, 0.965)
Very good vs good	0.454 (0.308, 0.669)
Sex	1.158 (0.928, 1.445)	1.054 (0.787, 1.411)	−0.010 (−0.026, 0.007)
BMI (standardized)	1.103 (0.988, 1.232)	0.909 (0.787, 1.050)	0.002 (−0.006, 0.011)
Economic problems
Yes	1 (ref)	1 (ref)	0 (ref)
No		0.372 (0.254, 0.545)	0.057 (0.032, 0.081)
Bad vs very bad	1.923 (0.950, 3.894)
Bad/neither good nor bad vs bad	1.082 (0.740, 1.582)
Good vs neither good nor bad	2.113 (1.311, 3.406)
Very good vs good	1.184 (0.375, 3.731)
Alcohol use the past 12 months
4 times a week or more	1 (ref)	1 (ref)	0 (ref)
2–3 times a week	1.421 (0.911, 2.217)	1.201 (0.653, 2.211)	0.012 (−0.021, 0.045)
2–4 times a month	1.452 (0.964, 2.185)	1.139 (0.645, 2.012)	0.004 (−0.027, 0.035)
Once a month or less	0.995 (0.656, 1.508)	1.426 (0.809, 2.514)	0.001 (−0.031, 0.032)
Never		1.629 (0.918, 2.891)	−0.032 (−0.063, 0.000)
Bad vs very bad	0.372 (0.186, 0.743)
Bad/neither good nor bad vs bad	1.021 (0.651, 1.602)
Good vs neither good nor bad	0.958 (0.589, 1.558)
Very good vs good	0.476 (0.104, 2.172)
Educational level
Compulsory school	1 (ref)	1 (ref)	0 (ref)
Grammar school	0.978 (0.722, 1.326)	1.236 (0.826, 1.848)	−0.010 (−0.033, 0.014)
University	1.318 (0.932, 1.863)	1.445 (0.933, 2.238)	0.014 (−0.011, 0.040)
Other	0.808 (0.570, 1.146)	1.488 (0.964, 2.295)	−0.018 (−0.044, 0.008)
Social support
No	1 (ref)	1 (ref)	0 (ref)
Yes, probably	1.303 (0.853, 1.991)	0.632 (0.392, 1.018)	0.039 (0.008, 0.070)
Yes, undoubtedly	2.060 (1.384, 3.066)	0.316 (0.201, 0.495)	0.052 (0.023, 0.082)
Smoking status
Yes, I smoke daily	1 (ref)	1 (ref)	0 (ref)
Yes, I smoke sometimes		1.002 (0.530, 1.894)	0.014 (−0.024, 0.052)
Bad vs very bad	0.431 (0.168, 1.102)
Bad/neither good nor bad vs bad	1.886 (0.990, 3.595)
Good vs neither good nor bad	1.149 (0.606, 2.180)
Very good vs good	1.068 (0.139, 8.198)
No, I have stopped smoking	1.081 (0.833, 1.404)	0.792 (0.568, 1.103)	−0.004 (−0.023, 0.016)
No, I have never smoked	1.744 (1.184, 2.568)	0.528 (0.314, 0.888)	0.014 (−0.015, 0.042)
Physical activity
Sedentary	1 (ref)	1 (ref)	0 (ref)
Moderate exercise (low activity)	2.390 (1.869, 3.056)	0.549 (0.403, 0.748)	0.044 (0.026, 0.062)
Moderate regular exercise	3.547 (2.434, 5.169)	0.538 (0.325, 0.890)	0.077 (0.050, 0.104)
Regular exercise and training	7.772 (4.662, 12.968)	0.511 (0.263, 0.993)	0.087 (0.051, 0.123)

Notes: Economic problems, difficulty in managing current expenditure during the past 12 months. Social support was assessed according to the question: “Do you have any persons in your vicinity who can give you personal support in case of personal problems or life crises?” General health odds >1 resulted in higher odds for better health. GHQ12 odds ratios <1 resulted in lower odds for psychological distress. Those cases where several odds ratios were reported for general health indicated heterogeneous associations between the explanatory variable and outcome. Significant effects are in bold face.

Abbreviations: GHQ12, General Health Questionnaire 12-item version; EQ-5D, EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire index; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; FP, fractional polynomials; ref, reference value; BMI, body mass index.

Age showed a linear association with self-reported general health, but only when comparing outcome “Good” to “Neither good nor bad” or when comparing “Very good” to “Good”. Age showed a U-shaped association with GHQ12 with the lowest odds for having psychological distress at 68 years.

Economic problems were associated with all three health measures, where reporting no economic problems was associated with higher odds for better self-reported general health, lower odds for psychological distress, and increased median of EQ-5D. For self-reported general health the association was significant only when comparing “Good” to “Neither good nor bad” health states.

Alcohol use was associated with self-reported general health (only when comparing “Bad” to “Very bad”) and weakly associated to EQ-5D. For both measures the reporting of no alcohol use was associated with lower levels of health.

Social support was associated with better status for all three health measures.

Smoking status was significantly associated with higher odds for better self-reported general health and lower odds for psychological distress for those reporting “Never smoked”.

Physical activity was associated at all levels with all three health measures. For self-reported general health, the odds of having better health were multiplied by a factor 2.4–7.7 depending on activity level. The odds of being psychologically distressed were reduced by approximately 50%. The median EQ-5D index increased with 0.04–0.09 depending on activity level.

There were no significant associations between the three health measures and sex, BMI, or educational level.

EQ-5D was associated with cardiovascular disease (effect on median [95% CI]): (−0.05, [−0.07, −0.03]), depression (−0.10 [−0.13, −0.07]), and chronic fatigue syndrome (−0.07, [−0.09, −0.05]), but not with hypertension or asthma.

Psychological distress was associated with depression (OR [95% CI]): (6.60 [3.92, 8.01]) and chronic fatigue syndrome (3.77 [2.61, 5.44]), but not with cardiovascular disease, hypertension, or asthma.

Self-reported general health was associated with cardiovascular disease when comparing “Neither good nor bad” to “Bad” (OR [95% CI]): (0.39 [0.29, 0.52]) and when comparing “Neither good nor bad” to “Good” (0.57 [0.41, 0.80]) and with asthma (0.73 [0.57, 0.95]) regardless of health state). For depression there were significant associations between self-reported general health and depression (OR range 0.30–0.73) and chronic fatigue syndrome (OR range 0.26–0.66), except when comparing “Very good” and “Good”. There were no associations between self-reported general health and hypertension.

Adjusting for comorbid conditions (cardiovascular disease, hypertension, asthma, depression, and chronic fatigue syndrome), however, did not alter the associations presented in Table 3 in any significant way.

Discussion

This study has shown that subjects with COPD when combined with good health and good quality of life were physically active. The higher the physical activity levels the better their health and quality of life. We also showed that even a low level of physical activity was better than a sedentary lifestyle.

Our results were in accordance with Garcia-Aymerich et al who, in an epidemiological study, assessed daily life activities in subjects with COPD and found associations between higher levels of regular physical activity and better functional status.²⁰ They also showed that physically active subjects with COPD had a lower risk of COPD admissions and mortality. They proposed that physical activity should be widely recommended for patients with COPD in COPD guidelines.²¹ Our results were also in accordance with those from an asthma population in Canada,²² where those with good self-reported health are more physically active. Pitta et al, also showed that encouragement to be more active in daily life is an important part of the management of patients with COPD.²³

Clinical studies have also shown that patients with COPD spend less time walking and standing compared with age- and sex-matched healthy subjects and activity is on a lower intensity level²³ that is not sufficient to promote and maintain health.²⁴

Multidisciplinary pulmonary rehabilitation is a basis for treatment of COPD, with evidence for improvement in exercise endurance, dyspnea, functional capacity, and quality of life.²³ Exercise training is a cornerstone of the concept of rehabilitation.² As the majority of patients with COPD are treated in primary care, it is important to make it possible for them to enter programs including physical training in primary care settings.²⁵ However, better functional status is associated with daily life activities rather than planned exercise activities,²¹ which is encouraging because regular spontaneous physical activity is easier for most subjects with COPD. In a recent study, Watz et al²⁶ investigated physical activity in patients with COPD and found that physical activity is already reduced from GOLD Stage II,² which suggests that patients spontaneously choose to reduce their activity rather than be restricted by pulmonary limitation, which implies a possible behavioral component that can be influenced.

The present study showed associations between health and quality of life and the factors of social support and absence of economic problems, in line with data reported from general population surveys.¹⁴ Among older persons with chronic diseases the highest risk for feelings of loneliness is reported for those with lung diseases.²⁷

There was a significant association between health, EQ-5D, and teetotalism. This is surprising as there are known relations between smoking and alcohol use,²⁸ which could be expected to influence health measures in subjects with COPD. The absence of some expected associations could also be interpreted as subjects with COPD, already having the status of limited health and quality of life, were not influenced by additional factors such as alcohol use.

Smoking was common among the subjects with COPD, where 28% smoked daily. This was a high number compared with smoking in the adult population in Sweden; 11% of men and 13% of women are daily smokers.²⁹ Thus, there are possibilities to reduce the prevalence of this important risk factor for subjects with COPD. Nonsmoking is a health supporting factor, but there is a worrying trend of higher prevalence of smoking among women, especially in younger age groups.³⁰

The design of the present study was cross-sectional and therefore no causal associations could be verified. Compared with studies directly aimed at subjects with respiratory symptoms, this population survey did not contain questions on specific respiratory symptoms, nor were there any instruments enabling grading severity of disease. The response rate in the present study was approximately 65%–70%, with a possible underestimation of smoking habits according to a study of nonresponders in a large scale questionnaire survey on respiratory health in Sweden.³¹ There are, however, no signs of bias in disease and symptom prevalence in that study.

The prevalence of self-reported COPD in the present study was low compared with other studies.³² The questionnaire did not focus on respiratory problems, however. Moreover, on the diagnosis list, the COPD diagnosis was, perhaps, not the primary diagnosis of choice. This could indicate that subjects with more severe disease, where a COPD diagnosis was clearly expressed, were included in the present study. The high proportion of retired persons or persons on sick leave also supported this assumption. It cannot be stated that our results could be generalized to the total COPD population.

The global perception of health status was, in our study, measured by one question according to the same principle as in other studies.³³ Idler et al conclude that self-ratings provide the respondents’ views of global health status in a way that nothing else can.³⁴ Regarding “Patient activity in COPD”, Paul W Jones suggests in a review that activity limitation may be a central determinant of impaired quality of life due to poor health,³⁵ which also implies an association between activity and health. Quality of life in chronic diseases varies between individuals and within an individual over time and can be described as “the discrepancy between our expectations and our experience”.³⁶ Montes de Oca et al report that an important proportion of persons with COPD grade their general health as good-to-excellent, and interpret this as “the patients’ underestimation of disease severity”.³³ This could, however, be a result of chronically ill patients’ adaptation to irreversible changes in their health through lower expectations of quality of life.³⁷

Conclusions

A better self-rated health status and quality of life was associated with higher levels of physical activity, social support, absence of economic problems, and never smoking. The findings indicated that of factors that can be influenced, the promotion of physical activity and the strengthening of social support are important to maintain or improve health and quality of life in subjects with COPD. Severity of the disease as a possible confounding effect should be investigated in future population studies.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a research grant from the Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation, the Swedish Heart and Lung Association, and the County Council of Värmland.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflict of interest in this work.