597
Views
41
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Medications that cause weight gain and alternatives in Canada: a narrative review

, , , &
Pages 427-438 | Published online: 21 Aug 2018

Abstract

Background

The cause of the obesity epidemic is multifactorial, but may, in part, be related to medication-induced weight gain. While clinicians may strive to do their best to select pharmacotherapy(ies) that has the least negative impact on weight, the literature regarding the weight effects of medication is often limited and devoid of alternative therapies.

Results

Antipsychotics, antidepressants, antihyperglycemics, antihypertensives and corticosteroids all contain medications that were associated with significant weight gain. However, there are several medication alternatives within the majority of these classes associated with weight neutral or even weight loss effects. Further, while not all of the classes of medication examined in this review have weight-favorable alternatives, there exist many other tools to mitigate weight gain associated with medication use, such as changes in dosing, medication delivery or the use of adjunctive therapies.

Conclusion

Medication-induced weight gain can be frustrating for both the patient and the clinician. As the use of pharmaceuticals continues to increase, it is pertinent for clinicians to consider the weight effects of medications prior to prescribing or in the course of treatment. In the case where it is not feasible to make changes to medication, adjunctive therapies should be considered.

Introduction

Worldwide, rates of obesity continue to rise, resulting in concurrent increases in metabolic disorders, such as type 2 diabetes and hypertension, which often require pharmacotherapy. This poses a major public health concern. Interestingly, close to 50% of North Americans will have taken a medication for a therapeutic purpose in the last 30 days.Citation1,Citation2 While pharmacotherapy is meant to be used for improving medical conditions, medications can be associated with a wide variety of adverse effects, including weight gain.Citation1,Citation3 This has tremendous consequences as excess weight is associated with worse health outcomes which can result in medication nonadherence in patients. Given these potentially poor outcomes combined with the global obesity crisis, it is important that clinicians consider the weight effects of medications.

There are several clinical guidelines that categorize medications as those that promote weight loss, weight gain or have weight neutral effects. However, inconsistencies exist when defining the weight effects of medication. Further, existing weight estimates are sparse, which makes it challenging for clinicians to recommend medications while considering the weight effects. This can result in weight-related side effects of prescription medications being overlooked. Lastly, recently, some reviews have been published which examine the weight effect of medication.Citation4,Citation5 However, similar to clinical guidelines, they are either devoid of or only provide estimates for some of the medications discussed. Thus, this paper will provide a comprehensive overview of the medications associated with weight change and suggest pharmaceutical substitutions to promote a more favorable body weight response. Medication classes were selected based on their use in prevalent medical conditions that are complications or comorbidities of obesity.

Classes of medications

Antipsychotics and mood stabilizers

Psychopathologies are tightly linked with weight changes.Citation6Citation9 Patients with mental health disorders are two to three times more likely to develop obesity than the general population.Citation10 A review examining psychiatric medication effect on weight suggests that over the course of treatment, ~70% of patients will experience some weight gain.Citation6 A list of commonly used antipsychotics and their weight effects can be found in .

Table 1 Treatment-emergent weight changes associated with antipsychotics and mood stabilizers

Medications for schizophrenia are known to result in significant weight gain. Clozapine- and olanzapine-treated patients can gain on average 4.5–16.2Citation11,Citation13 and 3.6–10.2 kg,Citation5,Citation13Citation16 respectively. Nonetheless, there is considerable variability in the proportion of individuals that will experience weight gain. Studies report that, on average, 29%–89%Citation11,Citation12 of patients receiving clozapine will gain some weight and 8%–37% of patients taking olanzapine will gain ≥7% of their body weight.Citation15,Citation17

Aside from clozapine and olanzapine, commonly prescribed medications for schizophrenia such as chlorpromazine (0.6–15.9 kgCitation18,Citation20), quetiapine (−1.5 to +4.1 kgCitation20,Citation22), haloperidol (−0.1 to +4.0 kgCitation20,Citation23,Citation24), sertindole (0.5–2.9 kgCitation13,Citation20,Citation25), iloperidone (0.6–2.5 kgCitation20,Citation24,Citation26) and risperidone (0.4–2.1 kgCitation13,Citation20,Citation24) are also reported to elicit significant weight gain. Conversely, the use of paliperidone (−1.3 to +1.9 kgCitation20,Citation26,Citation27), lurasidone (0.1–0.9 kgCitation20,Citation26,Citation28), ziprasidone (−1.1 to 0.1 kgCitation13,Citation16,Citation20) and aripiprazole (−1.4 to +0.2 kgCitation15,Citation20,Citation29) is associated with the least amount of weight gain among medications for schizophrenia, and thus, may be a more weight-favorable alternative.

Lithium is commonly prescribed for the treatment of bipolar disorder and has been associated with lesser, yet relevant weight gain (1.1–9.9 kgCitation30,Citation33). Additionally, valproic acid, a second-line treatment option for bipolar disorder, is also associated with significant gain in weight (0.7–6.9 kgCitation34,Citation36), albeit slightly lesser than reported with lithium. Conversely, lamotrigine (−4.2 to +0.6 kgCitation32,Citation34,Citation36) and carbamazepine (−3.1 to +0.4 kgCitation33,Citation34,Citation37), mood stabilizers used in the treatment of epilepsy and bipolar disorder, are associated with weight neutral to weight loss properties and may be used in lieu of lithium or valproic acid as a more favorable weight alternative medication.

Antidepressants

Antidepressants consistently have a lower weight gain potential when compared to antipsychotics. However, antidepressants may carry a greater weight gain burden globally as they are prescribed more frequently than antipsychotics.Citation38 There are five classes of antidepressants – tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin–norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors and atypicals. Information on the weight effects of the five classes of antidepressants can be found in .

Table 2 Treatment-emergent weight changes associated with antidepressants

TCAs have been prescribed since the 1950s and are reported to elicit the greatest weight gain among antidepressants. Amitriptyline (0.4–7.3 kgCitation5,Citation39,Citation42) and nortriptyline (0.3–4.1 kgCitation39,Citation40,Citation42) appear to be associated with the greatest amount of weight gain for these types of antidepressants. Other TCAs, such as desipramine (−0.9 to +2.0 kgCitation40,Citation41,Citation43), imipramine (+0.6–1.8 kgCitation39,Citation44,Citation45) and doxepin (0.0–2.7 kgCitation46,Citation49) are associated with more weight neutral effects. Lastly, trazodone (−1.2 to +0.9 kgCitation50,Citation52) may have the most favorable weight profiles of all TCAs as a few studies have observed small amounts of weight loss with its use.

Studies consistently report that of the MAOIs, phenelzine elicits the greatest amount of weight gain.Citation53 While several studies compare the use of phenelzine with other classes of antidepressants, there are only a few studies which adequately report on weight. Some studiesCitation45,Citation54 report weight outcomes as no significant change with no weight estimate provided, while other studies examine weight gain as a side effect of phenelzine, but only report mean changes in the subpopulation experiencing these side effects, or based on a threshold. For example, one study observed a mean weight gain of 9.1 kg in 6 of 14 patients taking phenelzineCitation55 and another reported a 6.8 kg weight gain in 11 of 141 patients.Citation49 Conversely, tranylcypromine appears to have a more favorable weight change profile and is associated with lesser to no weight changes (0.0–4.1 kgCitation45,Citation49,Citation56) in users. Additionally, isocarboxazid is reported to cause minor weight gain and even weight loss (−2.6 to +0.8 kgCitation57,Citation58), and may be used as a more favorable weight alternative when the use of MAOIs is indicated.

Citalopram (−0.1 to +7.1 kgCitation42,Citation59,Citation61) is associated with the greatest amount of weight gain and fluvoxamine (−3.5 to +1.7 kgCitation61,Citation63) with the greatest amount of weight loss for SSRIs. However, in contrast to TCAs and MAOIs, other commonly prescribed SSRIs appear to be relatively weight neutral. Escitalopram (−0.1 to +1.83 kgCitation42,Citation60,Citation64), paroxetine (+0.1 to 1.7 kgCitation42,Citation61,Citation65), sertraline (−1.6 to +1.0 kgCitation42,Citation61,Citation66,Citation67) and fluoxetine (−1.3 to +0.5 kgCitation5,Citation41,Citation43,Citation48,Citation50,Citation61) are all associated with weight changes of around ±2.0 kg. Thus, weight neutral SSRIs such as fluoxetine or sertraline or those that have a trend toward weight loss, such as fluvoxamine, may be used as an alternative to citalopram. Comparatively, serotonin–norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors are often weight neutral and include agents such as duloxetine (−0.5 to +1.1 kgCitation42,Citation64,Citation65), desvenlafaxine (−1.3 to +1.3 kgCitation68,Citation70) and venlafaxine (−1.4 to +1.2 kgCitation42,Citation52,Citation71,Citation72).

Atypical antidepressants are newer medications with distinct mechanisms from other classes of antidepressants. Mirtazapine is a used atypical antidepressant which is associated with a mean weight gain of 0.4–2.4 kg,Citation5,Citation42,Citation71,Citation72 while bupropion is associated with mean losses of 0.4 to 2.4 kgCitation5,Citation42,Citation47,Citation51,Citation66 and is commonly used as a substitute for some SSRIs.Citation18,Citation19 Further, owing to the weight loss attributed to bupropion, it has been combined with naltrexone and approved as a weight management medication (Contrave®; Valeant, Bridgewater Township, New Jersey, USA). Additional information on Contrave can be found in the “Considerations for pharmaceutical treatment” section.

Antihyperglycemics

There is a high prevalence of comorbid obesity and diabetes, with over 80% of patients who have type 2 diabetes also having obesity. Metformin is a first-line treatment option for type 2 diabetesCitation73 and is associated with favorable weight outcomes. Weight loss is reported as a known side effect of this medication,Citation74 with average decreases of 1.0–2.9 kgCitation5,Citation75,Citation78 ().

Table 3 Treatment-emergent weight changes associated with antihyperglycemics

Alternative treatment options for patients with type 2 diabetes include thiazolidinediones. These medications carry a lower risk of hypoglycemia than other antihyperglycemic medications as they lower the blood sugar by making the body more sensitive to insulin rather than by increasing the production. However, thiazolidinediones are associated with the most weight gain of antihyperglycemics, second only to insulin. Pioglitazone and rosiglitazone are associated with gains in weight of 2–3.9Citation5,Citation79,Citation81 and 1.2–5.3 kg,Citation78,Citation82,Citation83 respectively.

Insulin secretagogues are another alternative treatment option for diabetes. Sulfonylurea drugs such as chlorpropamide and tolbutamide are associated with weight gains of 2.6–5.3Citation84,Citation86 and 1.6–2.8 kg,Citation5,Citation76,Citation87 respectively. This side effect associated with taking these medications may be why other more weight neutral sulfonylureas, such as glyburide (−0.9 to +1.6 kgCitation78,Citation88,Citation89), glimepiride (−1.4 to +1.2 kgCitation90,Citation93) and gliclazide (−1.0 to +0.8 kgCitation75,Citation94), are more frequently prescribed. It is important to note that patients who are given sulfonylureas as a first-line treatment regimen may experience greater weight gain. More pronounced gains of 3.6Citation89 and 4.2 kgCitation80 have been reported in patients prescribed glyburide and gliclazide as the first-line diabetes treatment, respectively. Other insulin secretagogues, such as meglitinides, are associated a lower risk of hypoglycemia and may be a more weight-favorable alternative than sulfonylurea drugs. Indeed, repaglinide and nateglinide are associated with weight neutral to lesser weight gain properties, with changes of −0.2 to +1.8Citation79,Citation89,Citation95 and 0.3–0.9 kg,Citation5,Citation95,Citation96 respectively.

Inhibitors of dipeptidyl peptidate-4 (DPP-4) are essentially weight neutral and include alogliptin, sitagliptin, saxagliptin and linagliptin. Alogliptin is the most weight neutral DDP-4 inhibitor and associated with a weight change of −0.9 to +0.7 kg.Citation97Citation100 Conversely, sitagliptin, saxagliptin and linagliptin are associated with modest weight losses ranging from 0.1 to −2.6,Citation100Citation103 2.1 to 0.5Citation100,Citation103Citation105 and 2.1 to 0.6 kg,Citation90,Citation100,Citation106,Citation107 respectively. Acarbose, an α-glucosidase inhibitor, is limited in its use due to gastrointestinal side effects, but is associated with modest weight loss of 0.4–2.8 kg.Citation5,Citation77,Citation87,Citation105

Recently, there have been two new classes of diabetes medications that have made it to the market: glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists and sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors with promising weight reduction properties. GLP-1s have been on the market slightly longer than SGLT-2 inhibitors. Unlike other antihyperglycemics, GLP-1R agonists are administered as an injection like insulin. Exenatide, a GLP-1 analog, is associated with weight loss ranging from 1.2 to 4.0 kg,Citation5,Citation100,Citation108,Citation109 while liraglutide 1.8 mg is associated with slightly more modest weight loss of 1.7–3.4 kg.Citation5,Citation91,Citation102 Additional information on the use of liraglutide 3.0 mg as a weight management pharmaceutical (Saxenda®, Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsværd, Denmark) can be found in the “Considerations for pharmaceutical treatment” section. In regards to SGLT-2 inhibitors, there are currently three approved medications in Canada that fall into this class of antihyperglycemic medication: canagliflozin, dapagliflozin and empaliflozin. Similar to GLP-1s, all of the approved medications in this class are associated with weight loss in clinical trials, with the greatest weight loss observed in patients taking canagliflozin (1.9–4.0 kgCitation93,Citation110,Citation111), followed by dapagliflozin (1.0–4.5 kgCitation112,Citation114) and empaliflozin (1.5–2.9 kgCitation115,Citation117).

Weight gain is a well-known side effect of insulin and can range from 0.4 to 4.8 kg.Citation85,Citation86,Citation88,Citation118 However, currently, insulin is the only treatment option for type 1 diabetics and is used for type 2 diabetics when they cannot tolerate or are not responsive to other hypoglycemics, which prevents the use of alternative treatments. There is considerable variability in the amount of weight gain associated with the use of insulin. Aside from genetics, other factors which can contribute to insulin-related weight gain, such as drug administration, dose and speed of release (rapid vs slow), can be manipulated to decrease the weight gain potential of this medication. For example, a study examining the weight and glycemic effects of once a day insulin injection vs the use of an intermediate-acting insulin observed significantly greater weight gains in those using the intermediate compared to the once-daily insulin injection (+1.9 vs +0.4 kg) over a 6-month period.Citation118

Antihypertensives

Hypertension is a prevalent condition among individuals with excess weight. In fact, gaining weight is associated with increases in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure.Citation119 Dietary changes and weight management are typical first-line treatments for hypertension,Citation120 and as such, medications which are associated with weight gain should be avoided. Fortunately, the majority of medications within this class appears to be weight neutral or associated with weight loss ().

Table 4 Treatment-emergent weight changes associated with antihypertensives

Diuretics, more specifically hydrochlorothiazide, are associated with modest weight losses of 0.4–2.7 kg.Citation121Citation124 This is a consistent characteristic of this class of medication, with other commonly prescribed diuretics including chlorthalidone (−1.8 to 0.2 kgCitation122,Citation125,Citation126), indapamide (−2.7 to 0.5 kgCitation127,Citation129) and furosemide (−4.1 to +0.3 kgCitation122,Citation123,Citation130) being similarly associated with weight neutral to weight loss effects.

Of the commonly prescribed angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, enalapril (−3.0 to +0.4 kgCitation131,Citation133) and perindopril (−3.2 to +1.1 kgCitation134,Citation136) are associated with the greatest amount of weight loss. Lisinopril (−1.5 to 0.0 kgCitation124,Citation137,Citation138) and ramipril (−1.5 to +1.0 kgCitation139,Citation141) may also be associated with weight loss, but appear to be more weight neutral.

Beta-blockers are typically associated with weight gain for the first few months of treatment, followed by a plateau. However, the amount of weight gain associated with beta-blockers is moderate and may not be clinically significant.Citation142 Of the commonly prescribed beta-blockers, atenolol (−0.5 to +3.4 kgCitation143,Citation145), propranolol (−0.5 to +2.3 kgCitation146,Citation147) and metoprolol (1.2–2.0 kgCitation148,Citation149) are associated with the highest weight gain. Conversely, timolol (−1.8 to +0.4 kgCitation150,Citation152) and acebutolol (−0.6 to 0.0 kgCitation153,Citation154) appear to be weight neutral and may even have some weight loss properties. For alpha-blockers, weight gain is not a commonly reported side effect. In general, changes in weight for alpha-blockers appear to be minor or nonexistent, with the average changes in weight following clonidine (0.4–1.4 kgCitation155,Citation156) and prazosin (0.0–0.5 kgCitation157,Citation158) being <1.5 kg.

Angiotensin II receptor blockers and calcium channel blockers are the second-line treatment options for hypertension that are commonly compared in efficacy trials. Of the most commonly used angiotensin II receptor blockers, telmisartan (−2.1 to +0.2 kgCitation159,Citation162) and losartan (−4.2 to −0.1 kgCitation131,Citation163,Citation164) are associated with the greatest amount of weight loss. Olmesartan (−0.5 to +0.3 kgCitation161,Citation162,Citation165) and irbesartan (−1.0 to +0.2 kgCitation161,Citation165,Citation166) are associated with weight neutral effects and valsartan (0.6–2.4 kgCitation167,Citation169) is primarily weight neutral, but can be associated with modest weight gains. Conversely, the two most commonly used calcium channel blockers, amlodipine (−0.7 to +0.8 kgCitation170,Citation172) and diltiazem (−0.1 to +1.2 kgCitation173,Citation175), are relatively weight neutral with <1.5 kg weight changes on average.

In 2008, a new class of hypertension medications was approved for use in Canada, called direct renin inhibitors. Currently, aliskiren is the only medication within this class approved for use and appears to have weight neutral effects (0.0–1.0 kgCitation176,Citation178).

Corticosteroids

Corticosteroids including cortisone and other glucocorticosteroids can be used for the treatment of conditions such as asthma, dermatological or inflammatory disorders and rheumatic or autoimmune diseases.Citation179 The short-term use of corticosteroids has not been shown to be associated with significant changes in body weightCitation180 (). Conversely, literature on the long-term usage (≥3 months) of corticosteroids suggests the opposite,Citation181 with prednisone (1.7–5.8 kgCitation182,Citation184), prednisolone (1.5–4.4 kgCitation185,Citation186) and cortisone (1.5–8.4 kgCitation187,Citation189) being associated with significant weight gains. Additionally, there is considerable variability in the amount of weight gain that patients will experience while taking this class of medication, with one study reporting weight gains of ≥10 kg in more than one-fifth of patients taking prednisone at 1 year.Citation182 Very few alternatives exist for the use of corticosteroids. However, changes in treatment regimen can be useful in reducing weight increases.Citation190 Alternate day dosing schedule for prednisone may be beneficial as it has been shown to attenuate weight gains and even promote weight loss.Citation190

Table 5 Treatment-emergent weight changes associated with corticosteroids

Considerations for pharmaceutical treatment

Improving clinical indicators and patient’s health is paramount when selecting pharmaceutical treatment options and there are several factors that need to be taken into consideration. Given that weight gain is a commonly reported side effect for many medications, clinicians should strive to prescribe medication(s) with more favorable weight-related outcomes whenever clinically possible. With the overwhelming evidence of the health risk of excess weight and the association of gaining weight and nonadherence to medication, it is important to discuss and evaluate this potential side effect with the patient when prescribing a medication.

In order for fluctuations in weight to be monitored, baseline weight measurements should be taken prior to initiating a pharmaceutical treatment. A weight gain of >2.0 kg within a month, in the absence of health and lifestyle changes suggests that intervention may be necessary.Citation8 Prior to making changes to medication, changes to dietary and physical activity may be able to counteract the weight gaining effects of medications. Indeed, research has suggested that individuals taking psychiatric medications that are associated with weight gain can still lose a clinically significant amount of weight by participating in a lifestyle intervention without the need to alter their medication.Citation191,Citation192 If lifestyle changes alone do not result in the desired amount of weight loss, changes to medication should be considered. Where possible, changes to the dose or delivery of the medication should be attempted prior to medication substitution. When it is not feasible, clinicians should consider substituting medications. Fortunately, many of the medications examined in this review have more weight-favorable outcomes.

Once the decision has been made to change medications, clinicians should be cognizant to switch only one medication at a time, so that the effects on weight and medical efficacy can be appropriately evaluated.Citation190 A protocol highlighting clear instructions should be created for the patient to minimize the potential of withdrawal symptoms. When switching to a more weight-favorable medication, non-weight-related side effects must also be taken into consideration. For example, while bupropion is often recommended as an alternative therapy to other antidepressants due to its weight loss side effects, it is also associated with a risk of seizures. Further, cost is an important consideration as it can contribute to nonadherence. This may be the case with liraglutide 1.8 mg, which is associated with a better side effect and weight profile than other antihyperglycemic medications, but costs considerably more.

During the course of treatment, switching pharmacotherapies may not be feasible due to a variety of reasons such as cost and efficacy. In such cases, adjunctive therapies may be used to better manage treatment-induced weight gain. Currently, there are three medications approved for weight management in Canada. Orlistat, a lipase inhibitor, has been available since the 1970s and is associated with placebo-subtracted weight losses of 4.3 kg.Citation193 Unfortunately, the common side effects of this medication include oily and loose stools, which can ultimately lead to nonadherence and discontinuation. In comparison, liraglutide 3.0 mg, at a clinical dose of 3.0 mg, is also approved for weight management and has been associated with placebo-subtracted weight losses of 4.5–6.0 kg.Citation4,Citation27 While there are beneficial effects such as improved HbA1c levels, there are some more severe rare side effects such as gallstones and pancreatitis.Citation194 In 2018, Health Canada approved Contrave, which is a combination medication of bupropion, an norepinephrine-dopamine reuptake inhibitor, and naltrexone, an opiate antagonist. Results of a Phase 3 clinical trial suggest that the use of Contrave, as an adjunct to a lifestyle intervention, results in superior weight loss to placebo (5.0%–6.1% vs 1.3%), but as with other weight management medications, nausea appears to be a common side effect.Citation195

Where it is not possible to add an adjunctive therapy due to drug interactions or cost, patients should be made aware of the weight change potential, and research suggests that implementing lifestyle changes (ie, quality of diet and increased physical activity) may be beneficial to combat the weight gaining effects. For example, a study which compared metformin therapy alone and in addition to a lifestyle modification program observed greater weight loss in the group participating in the lifestyle modification (5.6 vs 2.1 kgCitation196).

There are several limitations that warrant mentioning. Due to the number of pharmaceuticals approved for treatment worldwide, it is not possible to examine the weight effect of every agent. As such, this review is not an exhaustive list, rather it evaluates commonly used pharmaceuticals that have been approved for use in Canada. The effect of pharmaceutical medications on weight depends of a multitude of factors; thus, the associations in this paper need to be interpreted with caution. As population demographics have shifted dramatically in the last 30 years, findings of studies examined may be dated and may not be generalizable to the population today. Patient demographics are an important consideration because differences in age, sex, body mass index and so on may have a significant impact on the weight changes that occur. Specifically, the weight gains associated with lithium are more severe in patients with obesity than their lower-weight counterparts (6.1 kg obese vs 1.1 kg non-obeseCitation32). Conversely, the weight gains associated with olanzapine are lower with increasing body mass index.Citation197 Further, this paper provides the mean ranges of absolute weight change, which may be useful for interpreting the impact of medication on weight change. However, these ranges merely reflect the results of available studies, some of which have small sample sizes (ie, n<10) and may not be generalizable to a heterogeneous population. As studies differ in treatment duration, dose, concomitant medications and intervention type, changes in weight observed in clinical practice may be different from the results presented here. For example, the duration of treatment has a significant impact on the weight outcome of patients for some medications. In one study, patients plateaued after 37 weeks of olanzapine treatment,Citation197 while another study observed that patients taking clozapine may persist in gaining weight after 46 months.Citation198 Given that weight gain is a complex and multifactorial issue, it may be possible that other factors contribute to the reported weight changes. Several of the studies examined did not account for potential confounding factors such as lifestyle changes. This may be especially pertinent in the case with glucocorticoids, where the results from a recent systematic review suggest that dietary intake is infrequently reported, making it difficult to assess weight changes.Citation179 However, as the course of pharmaceutical treatment does not occur independently of side effects such as weight gain, the estimates reported are still relevant to clinical practice.

Conclusion

Medication-induced weight gain can be frustrating for both patients and health care professionals. The increased use of pharmaceuticals in the past decade may, in part, contribute to the increasing rates of overweight and obesity globally. Excess weight has been shown to result in the development of many of the diseases treated by medications and to be associated with worse treatment outcomes. Further, due to the obesogenic effects of many pharmacotherapies, and poor long-term success in weight loss interventions, the assessment of the weight gain potential associated with medicinal treatment is of particular importance for individuals who already are overweight or obese and in patients with chronic disease.

This paper provides considerable options for selecting medications and summarizes the available literature on the effects of these common medications on weight change. Clinicians should select medications associated with more favorable weight profiles when first initiating treatment, or consider changing medications if patients are experiencing the weight gaining side effects, if clinically possible. When it is not feasible to change medications, adjunctive therapies or lifestyle intervention may help to combat weight gaining side effects.

Disclosure

SW is the Medical Director of the Wharton Medical Clinic and maintains privileges at Toronto East General Hospital and Hamilton Health Sciences. SW has previously received grants from CIHR and Mitacs, and has payment from Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly, Janssen and Astra Zeneca for advisory work. SW and RAGC are currently working with Novo Nordisk for the completion of pharmaceutical manuscript(s). RAGC is also the Research Coordinator at the Wharton Medical Clinic. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.

References

  • Rotermann M Sanmartin C Hennessy D Arthur M Prescription medication use by Canadians aged 6 to 79 Health Rep 2014 25 3 9
  • Centre for Disease Control and Prevention Staff Therapeutic Drug Use (2017) Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/drug-use-therapeutic.htm Accessed January, 2018
  • Leslie WS Hankey CR Lean MEJ Weight gain as an adverse effect of some commonly prescribed drugs: a systematic review QMJ 2007 100 395 404
  • Verhaegen AA van Gaal LF Drug-induced obesity and its metabolic consequences: a review with a focus on mechanisms and possible therapeutic options J Endocrinol Invest 2017 40 1165 1174 28660606
  • Domecq JP Prutsky G Leppin A Drugs commonly associated with weight change: a systematic review and meta-analysis J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2015 100 363 370 25590213
  • Virk S Schwartz TL Jindal S Nihalani N Jones N Psychiatric medication induced obesity: an aetiologic review Obes Rev 2004 5 3 167 170 15245385
  • Dent R Blackmore A Peterson J Changes in body weight and psychotropic drugs: a systematic synthesis of the literature PLoS One 2012 7 1 13
  • Malone M Medications associated with weight gain Ann Pharmacother 2005 39 12 2046 2055 16278256
  • Monteleone P Martiadis V Maj M Management of schizophrenia with obesity, metabolic, and endocrinological disorders Psychiatr Clin North Am 2009 32 4 775 794 19944883
  • Serretti A Mandelli L Antidepressants and body weight: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis J Clin Psychiatry 2010 71 10 1259 1272 21062615
  • Frankenburg FR Zanarini MC Kando J Centorrino F Clozapine and body mass change Biol Psychiatry 1998 43 7 520 524 9547931
  • Leadbetter R Shutty M Pavalonis D Vieweg V Higgins P Downs M Clozapine-induced weight gain: prevalence and clinical relevance Am J Psychiatry 1992 149 1 68 72 1728188
  • Allison DB Mentore JL Heo M Antipsychotic-induced weight gain: a comprehensive research synthesis Am J Psychiatry 1999 156 11 1686 1696 10553730
  • Zipursky R Gu H Green AI Clinical correlates of weight gain in first episode psychosis patients treated with olanzapine Schizophr Res 2003 60 1 372
  • Mcquade RD Stock E Marcus R A comparison of weight change during treatment with olanzapine or aripiprazole: results from a randomized, double-blind study J Clin Psychiatry 2004 65 Suppl 1 47 56 15600384
  • Breier A Berg PH Thakore JH Olanzapine versus ziprasidone: results of a 28-week double-blind study in patients with schizophrenia Am J Psychiatry 2005 162 10 1879 1887 16199834
  • Kane JM Detke HC Naber D Olanzapine long-acting injection: a 24-week, randomized, double-blind trial of maintenance treatment in patients with schizophrenia Am J Psychiatry 2010 167 2 181 189 20008947
  • Trethowan W Scott P Chlorpromazine in obsessive–compulsive and allied disorders Lancet 1955 265 781 785
  • Ayd FJ Prolonged administration of chlorpromazine (thorazine) hydrochloride: clinical and laboratory survey of fifty patients J Am Med Assoc 1959 169 1296 1301 13630754
  • Leucht S Cipriani A Spineli L Comparative efficacy and tolerability of 15 antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenia: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis Lancet 2013 382 951 962 23810019
  • Brecher M Leong RW Stening G Osterling-Koskinen L Jones AM Quetiapine and long-term weight change: a comprehensive data review of patients with schizophrenia J Clin Psychiatry 2007 68 4 597 603 17474816
  • Brecher M Rak IW Melvin K Jones AM The long-term effect of quetiapine (Seroquel™) monotherapy on weight in patients with schizophrenia Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract 2000 4 4 287 291 24926579
  • Zipursky RB Gu H Green AI Course and predictors of weight gain in people with first-episode psychosis treated with olanzapine or haloperidol Br J Psychiatry 2005 187 06 537 543 16319406
  • Weiden PJ Cutler AJ Polymeropoulos MH Wolfgang CD Safety profile of iloperidone: a pooled analysis of 6-week acute-phase pivotal trials J Clin Psychopharmacol 2008 28 2 Suppl 1 S12 S19 18334908
  • de Hert M Mittoux A He Y Peuskens J Metabolic parameters in the short- and long-term treatment of schizophrenia with sertindole or risperidone Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2011 261 4 231 239 20820795
  • de Hert M Yu W Detraux J Sweers K van Winkel R Correll CU Body weight and metabolic adverse effects of asenapine, iloperidone, lurasidone and paliperidone in the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: a systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis CNS Drugs 2012 26 733 759 22900950
  • Gopal S Vijapurkar U Lim P Morozova M Eerdekens M Hough D A 52-week open-label study of the safety and tolerability of paliperidone palmitate in patients with schizophrenia J Psychopharmacol 2011 25 5 685 697 20615933
  • Nakamura M Ogasa M Guarino J Lurasidone in the treatment of acute schizophrenia: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial J Clin Psychiatry 2009 70 6 829 836 19497249
  • Keck PE Marcus R Tourkodimitris S A placebo-controlled, double-blind study of the efficacy and safety of aripiprazole in patients with acute bipolar mania Am J Psychiatry 2003 160 9 1651 1658 12944341
  • Vendsborg PB Bech P Rafaelsen OJ Lithium treatment and weight gain Acta Psychiatr Scand 1976 53 139 147 1251759
  • Peselow ED Dunner DL Fieve RR Lautin A Lithium carbonate and weight gain J Affect Disord 1980 2 303 310 6450789
  • Bowden CL Calabrese JR Ketter TA Sachs GS White RL Thompson TR Impact of lamotrigine and lithium on weight in obese and nonobese patients with bipolar I disorder Am J Psychiatry 2006 163 7 1199 1201 16816224
  • Coxhead N Silverstone T Cookson J Carbamazepine versus lithium in the prophylaxis of bipolar affective disorder Acta Psychiatr Scand 1992 85 114 118 1543034
  • Pickrell WO Lacey AS Thomas RH Smith PE Rees MI Weight change associated with antiepileptic drugs J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2013 84 7 796 799 23236017
  • Corman CL Leung NM Guberman AH Weight gain in epileptic patients during treatment with valproic acid: a retrospective study Can J Neurol Sci 1997 24 240 244 9276111
  • Biton V Mirza W Montouris G Vuong A Hammer AE Barrett PS Weight change associated with valproate and lamotrigine monotherapy in patients with epilepsy Neurology 2001 56 2 172 177 11160951
  • Tohen M Bowden CL Smulevich AB Olanzapine plus carbamazepine v. carbamazepine alone in treating manic episodes Br J Psychiatry 2008 192 2 135 143 18245032
  • Lindsley CW The top prescription drugs of 2011 in the United States: antipsychotics and antidepressants once again lead CNS therapeutics ACS Chem Neurosci 2012 3 630 631 22896807
  • Berken GH Weinstein DO Stern WC Weight gain. A side-effect of tricyclic antidepressants J Affect Disord 1984 7 133 138 6238068
  • Fernstrom MH Kupfer DJ Antidepressant-induced weight gain: a comparison study of four medications Psychiatry Res 1988 26 265 271 2975806
  • Szarek BL Brandt DM A comparison of weight changes with fluoxetine, desipramine, and amitriptyline: a retrospective study of psychiatric inpatients J Nerv Ment Dis 1993 181 11 702 704 8228953
  • Blumenthal SR Castro VM Clements CC An electronic health records study of long-term weight gain following antidepressant use JAMA Psychiatry 2014 71 8 889 24898363
  • Remick RA Claman J Reesal R Comparison of fluoxetine and desipramine in depressed outpatients Curr Ther Res 1993 53 457 465
  • Frank E Kupfer DJ Bulik CM Levenson JA Imipramine and weight gain during the treatment of recurrent depression J Affect Disord 1990 20 165 172 2148336
  • Pande AC Grunhaus LJ Haskett RF Greden JF Weight change with antidepressant treatment Biol Psychiatry 2017 25 A55
  • Edwards NB Murphy JK Downs AD Ackerman BJ Rosenthal TL Doxepin as an adjunct to smoking cessation: a double-blind pilot study Am J Psychiatry 1989 146 373 376 2645796
  • Feighner J Hendrickson G Miller L Stern W Double-blind comparison of doxepin versus bupropion in outpatients with a major depressive disorder J Clin Psychopharmacol 1986 6 27 32 3081600
  • Feighner JP Cohn JB Double-blind comparative trials of fluoxetine and doxepin in geriatric patients with major depressive disorder J Clin Psychiatry 1985 46 20 25
  • Rabkin JG Quitkin FM Mcgrath P Harrison W Tricamo E Adverse reactions to monoamine oxidase inhibitors. Part II. Treatment correlates and clinical management J Clin Psychopharmacol 1985 5 2 9 3973068
  • Falk WE Rosenbaum JF Otto MW Zusky PM Weilburg JB Nixon RA Fluoxetine versus trazodone in depressed geriatric patients J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 1989 2 4 208 214 2699556
  • Weisler RH Johnston JA Lineberry CG Samara B Branconnier RJ Billow AA Comparison of bupropion and trazodone for the treatment of major depression J Clin Psychopharmacol 1994 14 3 170 179 8027413
  • Cunningham LA Borison RL Carman JS A comparison of venlafaxine, trazodone, and placebo in major depression J Clin Psychopharmacol 1994 14 99 106 8195464
  • Cantú TG Korek JS Monoamine oxidase inhibitors and weight gain Drug Intell Clin Pharm 1988 22 755 759 3068037
  • Bieck PR Firkusny L Schick Monoamine oxidase inhibition by phenelzine and brofaromine in healthy volunteers Clin Pharmacol Ther 1989 45 260 269 2920501
  • Evans DL Davidson J Raft D Early and late side effects of phenelzine J Clin Psychopharmacol 1982 2 208 210 7096609
  • Himmelhoch JM Thase ME Mallinger AG Houck P Tranylcypromine versus imipramine in anergic bipolar depression Am J Psychiatry 1991 148 910 916 2053632
  • Davidson J Turnbull C Loss of Appetite and Weight Associated with the Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitor Isocarboxazid J Clin Psychopharmacol 1982 2 263 265 7119133
  • Burnet J Treatment of anxiety states by antidepressant drugs Br Med J 1955 1 906 104 20788420
  • Bouwer CD Harvey BH Phasic craving for carbohydrate observed with citalopram Int Clin Psychopharmacol 1996 11 273 278 9031994
  • Colonna L Andersen HF Reines EH A randomized. double-blind, 24-week study of escitalopram (10 mg/day) versus citalopram (20 mg/day) in primary care patients with major depressive disorder Curr Med Res Opin 2005 21 1659 1668 16238906
  • Maina G Albert U Salvi V Bogetto F Weight gain during long-term treatment of obsessive–compulsive disorder: a prospective comparison between serotonin reuptake inhibitors J Clin Psychiatry 2004 65 1365 1371 15491240
  • Abell CA Farquhar DL Galloway SM Steven F Philip AE Munro JF Placebo controlled double-blind trial of fluvoxamine maleate in the obese J Psychosom Res 1986 30 2 143 146 3088266
  • Westenberg HG Stein DJ Yang H Li D Barbato LM A double-blind placebo-controlled study of controlled release fluvoxamine for the treatment of generalized social anxiety disorder J Clin Psychopharmacol 2004 24 1 49 55 14709947
  • Pigott TA Prakash A Arnold LM Aaronson ST Mallinckrodt CH Wohlreich MM Duloxetine versus escitalopram and placebo: an 8-month, double-blind trial in patients with major depressive disorder Curr Med Res Opin 2007 23 6 1303 1318 17559729
  • Wise TN Perahia DGS Pangallo BA Losin WG Wiltse CG Effects of the antidepressant duloxetine on body weight: analyses of 10 clinical studies Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry 2006 8 269 278 17235383
  • Croft H Settle E Houser T Batey SR Donahue RM Ascher JA A placebo-controlled comparison of the antidepressant efficacy and effects on sexual functioning of sustained-release bupropion and sertraline Clin Ther 1999 21 4 643 658 10363731
  • Søgaard J Lane R Latimer P A 12-week study comparing moclobemide and sertraline in the treatment of outpatients with atypical depression J Psychopharmacol 1999 13 4 406 414 10667618
  • Tourian KA Leurent C Graepel J Ninan PT Desvenlafaxine and weight change in major depressive disorder Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry 2010 12 1 PCC.08m00746
  • Tourian KA Pitrosky B Padmanabhan SK Rosas GR A 10-month, open-label evaluation of desvenlafaxine in outpatients with major depressive disorder Prim Care Companion CNS Disord 2011 13 2
  • Mcintyre RS Fayyad RS Guico-Pabia CJ Boucher M A post hoc analysis of the effect of weight on efficacy in depressed patients treated with desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d and 100 mg/d Prim Care Companion CNS Disord 2015 17 3 eCollection 2015
  • Guelfi JD Ansseau M Timmerman L Kørsgaard S Mirtazapine-Venlafaxine Study Group Mirtazapine versus venlafaxine in hospitalized severely depressed patients with melancholic features J Clin Psychopharmacol 2001 21 425 431 11476127
  • Kraus T Haack M Schuld A Hinze-Selch D Koethe D Pollmächer T Body weight, the tumor necrosis factor system, and leptin production during treatment with mirtazapine or venlafaxine Pharmacopsychiatry 2002 35 6 220 225 12518269
  • Clement M Harvey B Rabi DM Roscoe RS Sherifali D Canadian Diabetes Association 2013 clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of diabetes in Canada Can J Diabetes 2013 37 S20 S25 24070948
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb Co Glucophage(r) XR Product Monograph 2008 Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drug-satfda_docs/label/2008/020357s031,021202s016lbl.pdf Accessed November 20, 2017
  • Tessier D Maheux P Khalil A Fülöp T Effects of gliclazide versus metformin on the clinical profile and lipid peroxidation markers in type 2 diabetes Metabolism 1999 48 897 903 10421233
  • Josephkutty S Potter JM Comparison of tolbutamide and metformin in elderly diabetic patients Diabet Med 1990 7 510 514 2142054
  • Wang N Zhang JP Xing XY Associations between changes in glucagon-like peptide-1 and bodyweight reduction in patients receiving acarbose or metformin treatment J Diabetes 2017 9 8 728 737 27717194
  • Kahn SE Haffner SM Heise MA Glycemic durability of rosiglitazone, metformin, or glyburide monotherapy N Engl J Med 2006 355 2427 2443 17145742
  • Jovanovic L Hassman DR Gooch B Treatment of type 2 diabetes with a combination regimen of repaglinide plus pioglitazone Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2004 63 2 127 134 14739053
  • Tan MH Baksi A Krahulec B Comparison of pioglitazone and gliclazide in sustaining glycemic control over 2 years in patients with type 2 diabetes Diabetes Care 2005 28 3 544 550 15735185
  • Smith SR de Jonge L Volaufova J Li Y Xie H Bray GA Effect of pioglitazone on body composition and energy expenditure: a randomized controlled trial Metabolism 2005 54 1 24 32
  • Phillips LS Grunberger G Miller E Once- and twice-daily dosing with rosiglitazone improves glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes Diabetes Care 2001 24 2 308 315 11213884
  • Raskin P Rendell M Riddle MC A randomized trial of rosiglitazone therapy in patients with inadequately controlled insulin-treated type 2 diabetes Diabetes Care 2001 24 7 1226 1232 11423507
  • Clarke BF Campbell IW Comparison of metformin and chlorpropamide in non-obese, maturity-onset diabetics uncontrolled by diet Br Med J 1977 2 6102 1576 1578 589351
  • United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Relative efficacy of randomly allocated diet, sulphonylurea, insulin, or metformin in patients with newly diagnosed non-insulin dependent diabetes followed for three years BMJ 1995 310 83 88 7833731
  • United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes Lancet 1998 352 837 853 9742976
  • Coniff RF Shapiro JA Seaton TB Bray GA Multicenter, placebo-controlled trial comparing acarbose (BAY g 5421) with placebo, tolbutamide, and tolbutamide-plus-acarbose in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus Am J Med 1995 98 443 451 7733122
  • Herz M Sun B Milicevic Z Comparative efficacy of preprandial or postprandial Humalog Mix75/25 versus glyburide in patients 60 to 80 years of age with type 2 diabetes mellitus Clin Ther 2002 24 1 73 86 11833837
  • Marbury T Huang WC Strange P Lebovitz H Repaglinide versus glyburide: a one-year comparison trial Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1999 43 155 166 10369424
  • Gallwitz B Rosenstock J Emser A von Eynatten M Woerle H-J Linagliptin is more effective than glimepiride at achieving a composite outcome of target HbA 1c <7% with no hypoglycaemia and no weight gain over 2 years Int J Clin Pract 2013 67 317 321 23521323
  • Yang W Chen L Ji Q Liraglutide provides similar glycaemic control as glimepiride (both in combination with metformin) and reduces body weight and systolic blood pressure in Asian populations with type 2 diabetes from China, South Korea and India: a 16-week randomized, double-blind, active control trial Diabetes Obes Metab 2011 13 1 81 88 21114607
  • Garber A Henry R Ratner R Liraglutide versus glimepiride monotherapy for type 2 diabetes (LEAD-3 Mono): a randomised, 52-week, Phase III, double-blind, parallel-treatment trial Lancet 2009 373 9662 473 481 18819705
  • Leiter LA Yoon KH Arias P Canagliflozin provides durable glycemic improvements and body weight reduction over 104 weeks versus glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin: a randomized, double-blind, Phase 3 study Diabetes Care 2015 38 3 355 364 25205142
  • Ammari F Davies MJ Koppiker N Gregory R Burden AC The effect of gliclazide on plasma insulin, intact and 32/33 split proinsulin in South Asian subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus Diabet Med 1999 16 142 146 10229308
  • Rosenstock J Hassman DR Madder RD Repaglinide versus nateglinide monotherapy: a randomized, multicenter study Diabetes Care 2004 27 6 1265 1270 15161773
  • Saloranta C Hershon K Ball M Dickinson S Holmes D Efficacy and safety of nateglinide in type 2 diabetic patients with modest fasting hyperglycemia J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002 87 4171 4176 12213867
  • Rosenstock J Wilson C Fleck P Alogliptin versus glipizide monotherapy in elderly type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with mild hyper-glycaemia: a prospective, double-blind, randomized, 1-year study Diabetes Obes Metab 2013 15 906 914 23531118
  • del Prato S Camisasca R Wilson C Fleck P Durability of the efficacy and safety of alogliptin compared with glipizide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a 2-year study Diabetes Obes Metab 2014 16 1239 1246 25132212
  • Pratley RE Kipnes MS Fleck PR Wilson C Mekki Q Efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor alogliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled by glyburide monotherapy Diabetes Obes Metab 2009 11 167 176 19125778
  • Aroda VR Henry RR Han J Efficacy of GLP-1 receptor agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors: meta-analysis and systematic review Clin Ther 2012 34 6 1247 1258.e22 22608780
  • Nauck MA Meininger G Sheng D Terranella L Stein PP Sitagliptin Study 024 Group Efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, sitagliptin, compared with the sulfonylurea, glipizide, in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin alone: a randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial Diabetes Obes Metab 2007 9 2 194 205 17300595
  • Pratley RE Nauck M Bailey T Liraglutide versus sitagliptin for patients with type 2 diabetes who did not have adequate glycaemic control with metformin: a 26-week, randomised, parallel-group, open-label trial Lancet 2010 375 9724 1447 1456 20417856
  • Asti A D’Alessandro A Zito FP Sitagliptin versus saxagliptin in decompensated type 2 diabetes mellitus patients Ital J Med 2016 10 1 36 41
  • Rosenstock J Sankoh S List JF Glucose-lowering activity of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor saxagliptin in drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes Diabetes Obes Metab 2008 10 376 386 18355324
  • du J Liang L Fang H Efficacy and safety of saxagliptin compared with acarbose in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus uncontrolled on metformin monotherapy: results of a Phase IV open-label randomized controlled study (the SMART study) Diabetes Obes Metab 2017 19 11 1513 1520 28296055
  • Johansen O Neubacher D von Eynatten M Patel S Woerle H-J Cardiovascular safety with linagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a pre-specified, prospective, and adjudicated meta-analysis of a Phase 3 programme Cardiovasc Diabetol 2012 11 3 22234149
  • Kawamori R Inagaki N Araki E Linagliptin monotherapy provides superior glycaemic control versus placebo or voglibose with comparable safety in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, placebo and active comparator-controlled, double-blind study Diabetes Obes Metab 2012 14 4 348 357 22145698
  • Buse JB Bergenstal RM Glass LC Use of twice-daily exenatide in basal insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, controlled trial Ann Intern Med 2011 154 2 103 112 21138825
  • Hamdy O Carver C The why WAIT program: improving clinical outcomes through weight management in type 2 diabetes Curr Diab Rep 2008 8 413 420 18778592
  • Stenlöf K Cefalu WT Kim KA Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin monotherapy in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with diet and exercise Diabetes Obes Metab 2013 15 4 372 382 23279307
  • Schernthaner G Gross JL Rosenstock J Canagliflozin compared with sitagliptin for patients with type 2 diabetes who do not have adequate glycemic control with metformin plus sulfonylurea: a 52-week randomized trial Diabetes Care 2013 36 9 2508 2515 23564919
  • Bolinder J Ljunggren Ö Johansson L Dapagliflozin maintains glycaemic control while reducing weight and body fat mass over 2 years in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on metformin Diabetes Obes Metab 2014 16 2 159 169 23906445
  • Sjöström CD Hashemi M Sugg J Ptaszynska A Johnsson E Dapagliflozin-induced weight loss impacts 24 week HbA1c and blood pressure levels Diabetologia 2013 56 S81
  • Kohan DE Fioretto P Tang W List JF Long-term study of patients with type 2 diabetes and moderate renal impairment shows that dapagliflozin reduces weight and blood pressure but does not improve glycemic control Kidney Int 2014 85 962 971 24067431
  • Pieber TR Famulla S Eilbracht J Empagliflozin as adjunct to insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes: a 4-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (EASE-1) Diabetes Obes Metab 2015 17 10 928 935 26080652
  • Rosenstock J Jelaska A Zeller C Impact of empagliflozin added on to basal insulin in type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on basal insulin: a 78-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Diabetes Obes Metab 2015 17 10 936 948 26040302
  • Rosenstock J Seman LJ Jelaska A Efficacy and safety of empagliflozin, a sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, as add-on to metformin in type 2 diabetes with mild hyperglycaemia Diabetes Obes Metab 2013 15 12 1154 1160 23906374
  • Montañana CF Herrero CH Fernández MR Less weight gain and hypoglycaemia with once-daily insulin detemir than NPH insulin in intensification of insulin therapy in overweight type 2 diabetes patients – the PREDICTIVE™ BMI clinical trial Diabet Med 2008 25 916 923 18959604
  • Tyson CC Appel LJ Vollmer WM Impact of 5-year weight change on blood pressure: results from the Weight Loss Maintenance trial J Clin Hypertens 2013 15 7 458 464
  • Canada H Canada H Guidelines for management of hypertension Hypertens Canada 2017 2
  • Swartz SL Endocrine and vascular responses in hypertensive patients to long-term treatment with diltiazem J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1987 9 391 395 2438500
  • Bergström J Hultman E The effect of thiazides, chlorthalidone and furosemide on muscle electrolytes and muscle glycogen in normal subjects Acta Med Scand 2009 180 363 376
  • Finnerty FA Maxwell MH Lunn J Moser M Long-term effects of furosemide and hydrochlorothiazide in patients with essential hypertension: a two-year comparison of efficacy and safety Angiology 1977 28 125 133 869273
  • Reisin E Weir MR Falkner B Hutchinson HG Anzalone DA Tuck ML Lisinopril versus hydrochlorothiazide in obese hypertensive patients: a multicenter placebo-controlled trial Hypertension 1997 30 1 140 145 9231834
  • Langford HG Davis BR Blaufox D Effect of drug and diet treatment of mild hypertension on diastolic blood pressure. The TAIM Research Group Hypertension 1991 17 2 210 217 1671380
  • Cirillo M Marcarelli F Mele AA Romano M Lombardi C Bilancio G Parallel-group 8-week study on chlorthalidone effects in hypertensives with low kidney function Hypertension 2014 63 4 692 697 24396024
  • Leenen FHH Smith DL Boer WH Marquez-Julio A Diuretic and cardiovascular effects of indapamide in hypertensive subjects: a dose-response curve Curr Med Res Opin 1983 8 Suppl 3 47 52 6352185
  • Acchiardo SR Skoutakis VA Clinical efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of indapamide in renal impairment Am Heart J 1983 106 1 Pt 2 237 244 6346847
  • Isaac R Witchitz S Kamoun A Bagattini JC A long-term study of the influence of indapamide on the exchangeable potassium and sodium pools in hypertensive patients Curr Med Res Opin 1977 5 64 70 71973
  • Cotter G Weissgarten J Metzkor E Increased toxicity of high-dose furosemide versus low-dose dopamine in the treatment of refractory congestive heart failure Clin Pharmacol Ther 1997 62 2 187 193 9284855
  • Al-Thanoon ZA Mahmood IH Effects of losartan vs. enalapril on the markers of metabolic syndrome Oman Med J 2012 27 1 27 30 22359721
  • Apperloo Aj de Zeeuw D Sluiter HE de Jong PE Differential effects of enalapril and atenolol on proteinuria and renal haemodynamics in non-diabetic renal disease BMJ 1991 303 821 824 1932973
  • Franciosa JA Wilen MM Jordan RA Effects of enalapril, a new angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, in a controlled trial in heart failure J Am Coll Cardiol 1985 5 101 107 2981088
  • Koz C Baysan O Yokusoglu M The effects of perindopril on aortic elasticity and inflammatory markers in hypertensive patients Med Sci Monit 2009 15 7 Pi41 Pi45 19564839
  • Jandrain B Herbaut C Depoorter JC Voorde KV Long-term (1 year) acceptability of perindopril in type II diabetic patients with hypertension Am J Med 1992 92 4B S91 S94
  • Ivanov K Mychka V Prokhorova J The effectiveness of therapy perindopril arginine in treatment of patients with hypertension and diabetes type 2 in national program “PREMIA” J Hypertens 2011 29 e236
  • Anichkov DA Shostak NA Schastnaya OV Comparison of rilmenidine and lisinopril on ambulatory blood pressure and plasma lipid and glucose levels in hypertensive women with metabolic syndrome Curr Med Res Opin 2005 21 1 113 119 15881482
  • Heeg JE de Jong PE van der Hem GK de Zeeuw D Efficacy and variability of the antiproteinuric effect of ACE inhibition by lisinopril Kidney Int 1989 36 272 279 2550696
  • Yusuf S Gerstein H Hoogwerf B Ramipril and the development of diabetes JAMA 2001 286 15 1882 1885 11597291
  • Farmer JA Effect of ramipril on the incidence of diabetes (DREAM Study) Curr Atheroscler Rep 2007 9 2 95 17877915
  • Predel HG Dusing R Backer A Kipnowski J Kramer HJ Combined treatment of severe essential hypertension with the new angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor ramipril Am J Cardiol 1987 59 143D 148D
  • Sharma AM Pischon T Hardt S Kunz I Luft FC Adrenergic receptor blockers and weight gain: a systematic analysis Hypertension 2001 37 250 254 11230280
  • Bauduceau B UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group Efficacy of atenolol and captopril in reducing risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 39 BMJ 1998 317 713
  • Houston MC Olafsson L Burger MC Effects of nifedipine GITS and atenolol monotherapy on serum lipids, blood pressure, heart rate, and weight in mild to moderate hypertension Angiology 1991 42 681 690 1928808
  • Davis BR Effect of antihypertensive therapy on weight loss Hypertension 1992 19 393 399 1555871
  • Richardson DW Freund J Gear AS Mauck HP Preston LW Effect of propranolol on elevated arterial blood pressure Circulation 1968 37 4 534 542 4870102
  • Rössner S Taylor CL Byington RP Furberg CD Long term propranolol treatment and changes in body weight after myocardial infarction BMJ 1990 300 902 903 2186832
  • Macmahon SW Bernstein L Macdonald GJ Andrews G Blacket RB Comparison of weight reduction with metoprolol in treatment of hypertension in young overweight patients Lancet 1985 325 1233 1236
  • Messerli FH Bell DS Fonseca V Body weight changes with beta-blocker use: results from GEMINI Am J Med 2007 120 7 610 615 17602935
  • Freedman SF Freedman NJ Shields MB Effects of ocular carteolol and timolol on plasma high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level Am J Ophthalmol 1993 116 5 600 611 8238221
  • Leren P Foss PO Nordvik B Fossbakk B The effect of enalapril and timolol on blood lipids: a randomized multicenter hypertension study in general practice in Norway Acta Med Scand 1988 223 321 326 2835891
  • Pedersen OL Mikkelsen E Individual factors influencing the response to a beta-adrenergic blocking agent given alone and in combination with a diuretic in arterial hypertension Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1979 16 311 317 391577
  • Hansson L Berglund G Andersson O Holm M Controlled trial of acebutolol in hypertension Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1977 12 89 92 336378
  • Alhenc-Gelas F Plouin PF Ducrocq MB Corvol P Menard J Comparison of the antihypertensive and hormonal effects of a cardioselective beta-blocker, acebutolol, and diuretics in essential hypertension Am J Med 1978 64 1005 1012 655186
  • Gottdiener JS Reda DJ Williams DW Materson BJ Cushman W Anderson RJ Effect of single-drug therapy on reduction of left atrial size in mild to moderate hypertension: comparison of six antihypertensive agents Circulation 1998 98 2 140 148 9679720
  • Walker BR Deitch MW Schneider BE Hare LE Comparative antihypertensive effects of guanabenz and methyldopa Clin Ther 1981 4 275 284 7332915
  • Sterndorff B Johansen P The antihypertensive effect of pinacidil versus prazosin in mild to moderate hypertensive patients seen in general practice Acta Med Scand 1988 224 329 336 3188983
  • Pollare T Lithell H Selinus I Berne C Application of prazosin is associated with an increase of insulin sensitivity in obese patients with hypertension Diabetologia 1988 31 415 420 3065104
  • Mori H Okada Y Arao T Nishida K Tanaka Y Telmisartan at 80 mg/day increases high-molecular-weight adiponectin levels and improves insulin resistance in diabetic patients Adv Ther 2012 29 635 644 22821644
  • Makita S Abiko A Naganuma Y Moriai Y Nakamura M Effects of telmisartan on adiponectin levels and body weight in hypertensive patients with glucose intolerance Metabolism 2008 57 1473 1478 18803955
  • de Luis DA Conde R Gonzalez Sagrado M Effects of olmesartan vs irbesartan on metabolic parameters and visfatin in hypertensive obese women Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2010 14 9 759 763 21061834
  • de Luis DA Conde R González-Sagrado M Effects of telmisartan vs olmesartan on metabolic parameters, insulin resistance and adipocytokines in hypertensive obese patients Nutr Hosp 2010 25 2 275 279 20449538
  • Houlihan CA Allen TJ Baxter AL A low-sodium diet potentiates the effects of losartan in type 2 diabetes Diabetes Care 2002 25 4 663 671 11919122
  • Schneider AW Kalk JF Klein CP Effect of losartan, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, on portal pressure in cirrhosis Hepatology 1999 29 334 339 9918907
  • Rizos CV Milionis HJ Kostapanos MS Effects of rosuvastatin combined with olmesartan, irbesartan, or telmisartan on indices of glucose metabolism in Greek adults with impaired fasting glucose, hypertension, and mixed hyperlipidemia: a 24-week, randomized, open-label, prospective study Clin Ther 2010 32 3 492 505 20399986
  • Bramlage P Pittrow D Kirch W The effect of irbesartan in reducing cardiovascular risk in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients: an observational study in 16 600 patients in primary care Curr Med Res Opin 2004 20 1625 1631 15462695
  • van der Zijl NJ Serné EH Goossens GH Valsartan-induced improvement in insulin sensitivity is not paralleled by changes in microvascular function in individuals with impaired glucose metabolism J Hypertens 2011 29 10 1955 1962 21844821
  • van der Zijl NJ Moors CC Goossens GH Hermans MM Blaak EE Diamant M Valsartan improves {beta}-cell function and insulin sensitivity in subjects with impaired glucose metabolism: a randomized controlled trial Diabetes Care 2011 34 4 845 851 21330640
  • Saisho Y Komiya N Hirose H Effect of valsartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker, on markers of oxidation and glycation in Japanese type 2 diabetic subjects: blood pressure-independent effect of valsartan Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2006 74 201 203 16737758
  • Masajtis-Zagajewska A Majer J Nowicki M Effect of moxonidine and amlodipine on serum YKL-40, plasma lipids and insulin sensitivity in insulin-resistant hypertensive patients – a randomized, crossover trial Hypertens Res 2010 33 348 353 20139920
  • Lorimer AR Smedsrud T Walker P Tyler HM a comparison of amlodipine, verapamil and placebo in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension. Amlodipine Study Group J Hum Hypertens 1989 3 3 191 196 2527993
  • Chrysant SG Chrysant C Trus J Hitchcock A Antihypertensive effectiveness of amlodipine in combination with hydrochlorothiazide Am J Hypertens 1989 2 537 541 2527044
  • Sunderrajan S Reams G Bauer JH Renal effects of diltiazem in primary hypertension Hypertension 1986 8 238 242 3949375
  • Sasaki J Saeki Y Kawasaki K A multicenter comparison of nicorandil and diltiazem on serum lipid, apolipoprotein, and lipoprotein levels in patients with ischemic heart disease Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 1992 6 5 471 474 1450091
  • Vermeulen A Wester A Willemse PFA Lustermans FAT Stegeman CJ de Bruijn JHB Comparison of isradipine and diltiazem in the treatment of essential hypertension Am J Med 1988 84 3 42 45 3376973
  • Takenaka T Okayama M Kojima E Aliskiren reduces morning blood pressure in hypertensive patients with diabetic nephropathy on hemodialysis Clin Exp Hypertens 2013 35 4 244 249 23534458
  • Siddiqi L Oey PL Blankestijn PJ Aliskiren reduces sympathetic nerve activity and blood pressure in chronic kidney disease patients Nephrol Dial Transplant 2011 26 9 2930 2934 21467128
  • Jordan J Engeli S Boye SW Le Breton S Keefe DL Direct renin inhibition with aliskiren in obese patients with arterial hypertension Hypertension 2007 49 1047 1055 17353513
  • Berthon BS Macdonald-Wicks LK Wood LG A systematic review of the effect of oral glucocorticoids on energy intake, appetite, and body weight in humans Nutr Res 2014 34 3 179 190 24655484
  • Berthon BS Gibson PG Mcelduff P Macdonald-Wicks LK Wood LG Effects of short-term oral corticosteroid intake on dietary intake, body weight and body composition in adults with asthma – a randomized controlled trial Clin Exp Allergy 2015 45 908 919 25640664
  • Brown ES Chandler PA Mood and cognitive changes during systemic corticosteroid therapy Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry 2001 3 17 21 15014624
  • Wung PK Anderson T Fontaine KR Effects of glucocorticoids on weight change during the treatment of Wegener’s granulomatosis Arthritis Rheum 2008 59 5 746 753 18438908
  • Dessein PH Joffe BI Stanwix AE Christian BF Veller M Glucocorticoids and insulin sensitivity in rheumatoid arthritis J Rheumatol 2004 31 5 867 874 15124244
  • Stenson WF Cort D Rodgers J Dietary supplementation with fish oil in ulcerative colitis Ann Intern Med 1992 116 8 609 614 1312317
  • Hjelmesaeth J Hartmann A Kofstad J Glucose intolerance after renal transplantation depends upon prednisolone dose and recipient age Transplantation 1997 64 7 979 983 9381545
  • Gorard DA Hunt JB Payne-James JJ Initial response and subsequent course of Crohn’s disease treated with elemental diet or prednisolone Gut 1993 34 9 1198 1202 8406153
  • Mckenzie R O’Fallon A Dale J Low-dose hydrocortisone for treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome: a randomized controlled trial JAMA 1998 280 12 1061 1066 9757853
  • Sheehan HL Summers VK Oral cortisone treatment of hypopituitarism Br Med J 1954 1 4864 723 726 13140848
  • Chrousos GA Kattah JC Beck RW Cleary PA Side effects of glucocorticoid treatment. Experience of the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial JAMA 1993 269 16 2110 2112 8468765
  • Cheskin LJ Bartlett SJ Zayas R Twilley CH Allison DB Contoreggi C Prescription medications: a modifiable contributor to obesity South Med J 1999 92 9 898 904 10498166
  • Alvarez-Jiménez M Hetrick SE González-Blanch C Gleeson JF Mcgorry PD Non-pharmacological management of antipsychotic-induced weight gain: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials Br J Psychiatry 2008 193 101 107 18669990
  • Imayama I Alfano CM Mason C Weight and metabolic effects of dietary weight loss and exercise interventions in postmenopausal antidepressant medication users and non-users: a randomized controlled trial Prev Med 2013 57 5 525 532 23859929
  • Drent ML van der Veen EA Lipase inhibition: a novel concept in the treatment of obesity Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1993 17 4 241 244 8387973
  • Novo Nordisk Saxenda Product Monograph 2016 Available from: http://www.novonordisk.ca/content/dam/Canada/AFFILIATE/www-novonordisk-ca/OurProducts/PDF/Saxenda_PM_English.pdf Accessed April January 20, 2017
  • Greenway FL Plodkowski RA Greenway FL Effect of naltrexone plus bupropion on weight loss in overweight and obese adults (COR-I): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 3 trial Lancet 2010 376 595 605 20673995
  • Douketis JD Macie C Thabane L Williamson DF Systematic review of long-term weight loss studies in obese adults: clinical significance and applicability to clinical practice Int J Obes 2005 29 1153 1167
  • Kinon BJ Basson BR Gilmore JA Tollefson GD Long-term olanzapine treatment: weight change and weight-related health factors in schizophrenia J Clin Psychiatry 2001 62 92 100 11247108
  • Henderson DC Cagliero E Gray C Clozapine, diabetes mellitus, weight gain, and lipid abnormalities: a five-year naturalistic study Am J Psychiatry 2000 157 6 975 981 10831479