The Relationship of Hyperferritinemia to Metabolism and Chronic Complications in Type 2 Diabetes

Abstract

Aim

Elevated serum ferritin has been found to be closely related to type 2 diabetes mellitus. This study aimed to explore the relationship of high serum ferritin to metabolism and chronic complications in type 2 diabetes.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study. A total of 330 type 2 diabetes patients who visited an endocrine clinic were included for the analysis. Serum ferritin and metabolic parameters were recorded. The prevalence of chronic diabetic complications was evaluated. Based on serum ferritin, participants were divided into hyperferritinemia and normal-ferritin groups. Metabolic parameters and prevalence of chronic diabetic complications were compared. The relationship between hyperferritinemia and chronic diabetic complications was explored with multivariate logistic regression models. Data were statistically analyzed by sex.

Results

Compared with the normal-ferritin group, the hyperferritinemia group showed higher levels of the serum inflammatory marker CRP and higher prevalence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and coronary heart disease (CHD), regardless of sex (p<0.05). Moreover, male patients with hyperferritinemia had increased serum triglyceride, alanine transferase, γ-glutamyltranspeptidase, urea nitrogen, creatinine, and uric acid and higher prevalence of microalbuminuria (p<0.01). After controlling for demographics and metabolic profiles, hyperferritinemia remained an independent risk factor of DR (male OR 3.957, 95% CI 1.559–10.041, p=0.004; female OR 2.474, 95% CI 1.127–5.430, p=0.024) and CHD (male OR 2.607, 95% CI 1.087–6.257, p=0.032; female OR 2.293, 95% CI 1.031–5.096, p=0.042).

Conclusion

This study found that hyperferritinemia was associated with increased CRP and higher prevalence of DR and CHD in type 2 diabetes. In men, high serum ferritin was also associated with dyslipidemia, hepatic dysfunction, and microalbuminuria.

Keywords:

• diabetes mellitus
• type 2
• ferritin
• metabolism
• chronic complication

Introduction

Serum ferritin is widely recognized as an index of total iron stores. High serum ferritin indicates an overload of iron in the body.¹ This overload is associated with the production of reactive oxygen species.² Iron-induced oxidative stress is involved in various pathological conditions, such as type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM),^3,4 cancers,⁵ and cardiovascular conditions.^6,7 Serum ferritin is also considered a marker of systemic inflammation.⁸ Hyperferritinemia is linked to proinflammatory and immunosuppressive effects.⁹ Studies have shown that increased oxidative stress and inflammation are important mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of T2DM and its complications. As such, the relationship of hyperferritinemia to T2DM and its complications is worthy of study. To our knowledge, little research has focused on the impact of hyperferritinemia on metabolic parameters in T2DM patients. Furthermore, the relationship between serum ferritin and diabetic complications is under debate. Suárez et al¹⁰ reported that high ferritin was associated with decreased cardiovascular disease risk in T2DM. Hermans et al¹¹ reported that T2DM patients with high serum ferritin had lower prevalence of coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, and peripheral artery disease. However, Mokhtari et al¹² reported that serum ferritin had a significantly positive correlation with the likelihood and severity of coronary artery disease. Smotra et al¹³ reported a significant association between increased serum ferritin and nephropathy, retinopathy, and neuropathy. The purpose of this study was to describe and evaluate the relationship of hyperferritinemia to metabolism and chronic complications in T2DM.

Methods

Participants

This cross-sectional observational study included 330 T2DM patients with a DM course >5 years who attended Tianjin Fourth Central Hospital. Patients attending the endocrine clinic for improving glycemic control or screening complications were included. Exclusion criteria were malignant disease, acute inflammatory disease, primary liver or kidney disease, anemia (Hb <12 g%), hereditary hemochromatosis, a history of abundant alcohol intake (women >40 g/day, men >60 g/day), overt thyroid dysfunction, and taking such drugs as iron supplements, steroids, and antirheumatic drugs. The study has been conducted according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the institutional review board of Tianjin Fourth Central Hospital (2017-SZXL017). All participants provided informed written consent.

Serum-Ferritin Measurement

Serum ferritin was measured using chemiluminescence (Cobas E411 Roche Diagnostics). Coefficient variations for intra- and interassays were <2% and <6.6% respectively. The reference interval was 30–400 μg/L in male, and 15–150 μg/L in female.¹⁴ Hyperferritinemia was defined as serum ferritin >400 μg/L in men or >150 μg/L in women. Patients with normal ferritin comprised the control group.

Determination of Metabolic Indices

Serum triglycerides (TGs), total cholesterol (TC), low–density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (Cr), uric acid (UA), alanine transferase (ALT), γ-glutamyltranspeptidase (GGT), and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) were measured by enzymatic procedures using an autoanalyzer (Hitachi 7600-020). CRP was measured by immunoturbidimetry (Beckman Coulter). Glycated hemoglobin A_1c (HbA_1c) was measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography (Bio-Rad). Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration’s equation.¹⁵

Chronic Diabetes Complications

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) was defined as per the criteria of the Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy Study based on nonmydriatic fundus photography. We used the ratio of urinary albumin to creatinine to define microalbuminuria (MAU). MAU was defined as an albumin:creatinine ratio ≥30 mg/g on two consecutive urine tests. Urine samples were excluded if microscopic urinalysis showed erythrocytes >5/high-power field, white blood cells >5/high-power field, epithelial cells >5/high-power field or apparent casts or bacteria. Coronary heart disease (CHD) was determined according to patient history, coronary arteriography, coronary computed tomography angiography, or echocardiography. Cerebrovascular disease was judged according to patient history or cranial computed tomography. Hypertension was determined according to patient history and blood pressure.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 11.0. Continuous variables are expressed as means ± SD or medians (IQR). Categorical variables are expressed as counts and percentages. Significance of differences was assessed by independent t-tests for normally distributed variables or Mann–Whitney U tests for variables with skewed distribution. For comparison of qualitative data, χ² tests were used. Strength of association between two variables was assessed with Spearman correlation analyses. Logistic regression was used to identify the relationship between chronic DM complications and hyperferritinemia. Covariates controlled in multivariate logistic models were DM duration, age, smoking status, body-mass index (BMI), TC, TGs, LDL-C, BUN, Cr, FPG, HbA_1c, and CRP. Results were expressed as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Two-sided p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Comparison of Clinical Characteristics and Metabolic Parameters Between Hyperferritinemia and Normal-Ferritin Groups

Of the 330 patients, 179 were men and 151 women. In men, median serum ferritin in the hyperferritinemia and normal-ferritin groups was 562.1 (254.5) μg/L and 211.5 (122.6) μg/L, respectively (p<0.01). There were no significant differences for DM duration, age, smoking rate, BMI, TC, LDL-C, eGFR, FPG, or HbA_1c between the hyperferritinemia and normal-ferritin groups (p>0.05). However, serum TGs, ALT, GGT, BUN, UA, Cr, and CRP in the hyperferritinemia group were significantly higher than in the normal-ferritin group (p<0.01, Table 1). In women, median serum ferritin in the hyperferritinemia and normal-ferritin groups was 223.1 (109.6) μg/L and 108.1 (54.6) μg/L, respectively (p<0.01). Only serum CRP in the hyperferritinemia group was significantly higher (p<0.01, Table 1).

Table 1 Clinical characteristics and metabolic parameters in hyperferritinemia and normal-ferritin groups

	Men			Women
	Controls (n=121)	Hyperferritinemia (n=58)	p	Controls (n=75)	Hyperferritinemia (n=76)	p
Ferritin (μg/L)	211.5(122.7)	562.2(254.5)	0.000*	108.1(54.6)	223.1(109.6)	0.000*
Diabetes duration (years)	12.9±6.3	11.7±5.5	0.186	14.5±7.3	13.9±7.0	0.617
Age (years)	62.3±9.1	60.7±9.4	0.281	65.6±8.1	66.3±8.1	0.564
Smoking (%)	78(64.5)	45(77.5)	0.076	8(75)	6(76)	0.557
BMI (kg/m^2)	26.4±16.2	26.5±3.8	0.930	25.8±3.0	26.1±3.4	0.594
TC (mmol/L)	4.72±1.08	4.70±0.80	0.855	5.12±1.23	4.80±1.15	0.109
LDL-C(mmol/L)	3.20±0.92	3.17±0.78	0.803	3.38±0.95	3.23±0.92	0.334
TGs (mmol/L)	1.47(1.10)	2.18(1.83)	0.003*	1.62(1.21)	1.51(1.07)	0.842
FPG(mmol/L)	9.99±3.24	10.56±3.26	0.277	9.32±3.51	9.82±3.51	0.373
HbA1c (%)	9.40±2.08	9.16±1.79	0.443	8.75±1.90	8.93±2.08	0.564
BUN(mmol/L)	5.40(1.80)	6.30(1.95)	0.000*	5.60(1.90)	5.60(2.40)	0.241
Cr(umol/L)	66.5(19.0)	79.3(24.5)	0.001*	59.0(17.0)	58.0(14.7)	0.787
UA(ummol/L)	316.3±73.1	366.2±94.3	0.001*	294.8±75.9	313.7±102.3	0.199
eGFR(mL/min/1.73m^2)	88.5±4.0	81.1±3.7	0.860	74.5±2.7	75.5±2.6	0.787
CRP(mg/L)	3.67(3.51)	5.46(6.00)	0.000*	4.74(3.64)	5.92(5.28)	0.009*
ALT(U/L)	15.0(9.0)	19.5(19.5)	0.000*	15.0(10.0)	18.0(11.5)	0.221
GGT (U/L)	21.0(14.0)	29.0(30.5)	0.000*	17.0(13.0)	20.0(13.0)	0.167

Notes: Data presented as means ± SD, medians (IQR), or n (%); t-tests for continuous data, Mann–Whitney U tests for abnormally distributed variables, and χ² tests for categorical data.

Abbreviations: BMI, body-mass index; TC, total cholesterol; LDL-C, low–density lipoprotein cholesterol; TGs, triglycerides; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; HbA₁c, glycated hemoglobin A₁c; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; Cr, serum creatinine; UA, uric acid; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; ALT, alanine transaminase; GGT, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase.

Comparison of Prevalence of Chronic Diabetes Complications Between Hyperferritinemia and Normal-Ferritin Groups

As shown in Table 2, the prevalence of DR and CHD for both men and women was significantly higher in the hyperferritinemia group (p<0.05), while cerebrovascular disease showed no difference (p>0.05).The prevalence of MAU and hypertension in the hyperferritinemia group was also significantly higher than the normal-ferritin group in men (p<0.05).

Table 2 Chronic diabetic complications in hyperferritinemia and normal-ferritin groups

	Men			Women
	Controls (n=121)	Hyperferritinemia (n=58)	p	Control (n=75)	Hyperferritinemia (n=76)	p
DR, n (%)	53(43.8)	41(70.7)	0.002*	36(48.0)	50(65.8)	0.039*
MAU, n (%)	38(31.4)	30(51.7)	0.007*	23(30.6)	27(35.5)	0.484
CHD, n (%)	39(32.2)	32(55.2)	0.003*	37(49.3)	50(65.8)	0.041*
Hypertension, n (%)	66(54.5)	42(72.4)	0.022*	57(76.0)	64(84.2)	0.206
Cerebrovascular disease, n (%)	35(28.9)	22(37.9)	0.226	19(25.3)	25(32.9)	0.307

Note: *χ² tests.

Abbreviations: DR, diabetic retinopathy; MAU, microalbuminuria; CHD, coronary heart disease.

Correlation of Hyperferritinemia with Metabolic Parameters and Chronic Diabetes Complications

In men, hyperferritinemia was positively correlated with ALT (r=0.315, p=0.000), GGT (r=0.274, p=0.000), CRP (r=0.299, p=0.000), BUN (r=0.279, p=0.000), Cr (r=0.244, p=0.001), UA (r=0.231, p=0.002), TGs (r=0.227 p=0.002), DR (r=0.243, p=0.002), CHD (r=0.219, p=0.003), MAU (r=0.204, p=0.007), hypertension (r=0.171, p=0.022), and BMI (r=0.196, p=0.009). In women, hyperferritinemia was positively correlated with CRP (r=0.216, p=0.008), DR (r=0.175, p=0.040), and CHD (r=0.167, p=0.041).

Logistic Regression Analysis of Associations Between Chronic Diabetes Complications and Hyperferritinemia

In multivariate logistic models, after controlling for demographic and metabolic variables, DR was identified as the dependent variable. Hyperferritinemia remained independently associated with DR (male OR 3.957, 95% CI 1.559–10.041, p=0.004; female OR 2.474, 95% CI 1.127–5.430, p=0.024) (Table 3). Similarly, when CHD was identified as the dependent variable, hyperferritinemia remained an independent risk factor of CHD (male OR 2.607, 95% CI 1.087–6.257, p=0.032; female OR 2.293, 95% CI 1.031–5.096, p=0.042; Table 4). The association between hyperferritinemia and MAU remained significant in men (OR 2.162, 95% CI 1.096–5.055; p=0.045; Table 5).

Table 3 Logistic regression analysis of associations between DR and hyperferritinemia

	Men		Women
	OR (95% CI)	p	OR (95% CI)	p
Hyperferritinemia	3.957(1.559–10.041)	0.004	2.474(1.127–5.430)	0.024
Diabetes duration	1.073(1.002–1.149)	0.044	1.054(0.994–1.117)	0.076
TC	1.632(0.691–3.857)	0.264	1.163(0.685–1.977)	0.333
LDL-C	1.537(1.203–1.423)	0.211	0.940(0.485–1.823)	0.855
TGs	0.783(0.548–1.118)	0.179	1.089(0.794–1.492)	0.597
FPG	1.100(0.922–1.313)	0.291	0.997(0.845–1.176)	0.970
HbA1c	1.019(0.770–1.349)	0.895	1.055(0.797–1.398)	0.708
BUN	1.133(0.871–1.473)	0.352	1.424(1.064–1.906)	0.018
Cr	1.022(0.996–1.049)	0.103	0.992(0.959–1.025)	0.620
CRP	0.991(0.903–1.083)	0.846	0.959(0.888–1.035)	0.283
BMI	0.990(0.960–1.021)	0.529	0.981(0.860–1.119)	0.774
Smoking	0.478(0.206–1.112)	0.087	0.484(0.121–1.934)	0.305
Age	0.978(0.927–1.031)	0.401	0.974(0.924–1.027)	0.335
Constant	0.138	0.408	0.394	0.741

Abbreviations: TC, total cholesterol; LDL-C, low–density lipoprotein cholesterol; TGs, triglycerides; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; HbA₁c, glycated hemoglobin A₁c; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; Cr, creatinine; BMI, body-mass index.

Table 4 Logistic regression analysis of associations between CHD and hyperferritinemia

	Men		Women
	OR (95% CI)	p	OR (95% CI)	p
Hyperferritinemia	2.607(1.087–6.257)	0.032	2.293(1.031–5.096)	0.042
Diabetes duration	1.003(0.939–1.071)	0.934	1.125(1.053–1.202)	0.001
TC	0.724(0.339–1.544)	0.403	1.058(0.616–1.818)	0.838
LDL-C	1.648(0.997–1.423)	0.285	0.812(0.412–1.601)	0.549
TGs	1.137(0.872–1.482)	0.342	1.046(0.801–1.365)	0.742
FPG	0.890(0.750–1.056)	0.182	0.912(0.764–1.089)	0.308
HbA1c	1.085(0.825–1.426)	0.559	1.320(0.978–1.781)	0.070
BUN	1.001(0.772–1.298)	0.993	0.954(0.734–1.239)	0.722
Cr	1.028(1.003–1.055)	0.030	1.027(0.992–1.063)	0.137
CRP	1.034(0.949–1.127)	0.449	1.025(0.956–1.100)	0.485
BMI	0.989(0.954–1.024)	0.524	1.007(0.889–1.141)	0.916
Smoking	1.084(0.468–2.510)	0.850	5.003(1.067–23.669)	0.042
Age	1.052(1.003–1.102)	0.038	1.013(0.961–1.069)	0.628
Constant	0.049	0.183	0.004	0.056

Abbreviations: CHD, coronary heart disease; TC, total cholesterol; LDL-C, low–density lipoprotein cholesterol; TGs, triglycerides; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; HbA₁c, glycated hemoglobin A₁c; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; Cr, creatinine; CRP, BMI, body-mass index.

Table 5 Logistic regression analysis of associations between MAU and hyperferritinemia

	Men		Women
	OR(95% CI)	p	OR(95% CI)	p
Hyperferritinemia	2.162(1.096–5.055)	0.045	0.981(0.435–2.216)	0.964
Diabetes duration	1.041(0.978–1.108)	0.208	0.988(0.934–1.046)	0.677
TC	1.996(0.799–4.983)	0.139	0.784(0.445–1.380)	0.399
LDL-C	0.368(0.133–1.022)	0.055	1.115(0.553–2.246)	0.762
TGs	0.823(0.605–1.119)	0.213	0.941(0.705–1.257)	0.681
FPG	1.069(0.910–1.256)	0.417	0.996(0.838–1.185)	0.968
HbA1c	1.180(0.896–1.554)	0.239	1.148(0.851–1.550)	0.366
BUN	1.054(0.820–1.355)	0.680	1.506(1.136–1.997)	0.004
Cr	1.021(0.996–1.047)	0.100	1.023(0.998–1.060)	0.199
CRP	1.054(0.966–1.150)	0.240	1.025(0.964–1.089)	0.432
BMI	1.089(0.972–1.221)	0.142	0.932(0.818–1.062)	0.288
Smoking	0.945(0.410–2.178)	0.894	1.097(0.284–4.232)	0.893
Age	0.994(0.948–1.043)	0.814	1.038(0.984–1.095)	0.174
Constant	0.001	0.017	0.005	0.063

Abbreviations: MAU, microalbuminuria; LDL-C, low–density lipoprotein cholesterol; TC, total cholesterol; TGs, triglycerides; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; HbA₁c, glycated hemoglobin A₁c; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; Cr, serum creatinine; BMI, body-mass index.

Discussion

The relationship between hyperferritinemia and metabolism and chronic complication in T2DM is controversial. The present study demonstrates that hyperferritinemia has a relationship with metabolism and chronic complications in T2DM. We have shown here that hyperferritinemia is associated with increased CRP levels and prevalence of DR and CHD. Another important outcome of the present study was that hyperferritinemia was associated with increased serum TGs, ALT, GGT, BUN, UA, and Cr and higher prevalence of MAU in men.

Associations Between Hyperferritinemia and Metabolic Characteristics in Type 2 Diabetes Patients

There was no significant difference in BMI or glycemic control index (FPG, HbA_1c) values between the hyperferritinemia and normal-ferritin groups, ie, high serum ferritin was not associated with BMI or poor glycemic control in longer-course DM patients. Patients with hyperferritinemia had higher CRPs level regardless of sex, with a significantly positive correlation between hyperferritinemia and  CRPs. Our results are in agreement with Khan et al,¹⁶ who reported a strong positive correlation between ferritin and CRP (r=0.87, p<0.001). Accumulated evidence supports serum ferritin being considered a marker of systemic inflammation and a key mediator of immunodysregulation.⁹

Notably, levels of TGs, ALT, GGT, BUN, Cr, and UA in the hyperferritinemia group were higher than the normal-ferritin group in men. A significant positive correlation was found between hyperferritinemia and metabolic index values. Musina et al¹⁷ reported ferritin concentration was positively correlated with TG levels (r=0.244, p<0.05). Smotra et al¹³ found that serum ferritin had a significantly positive correlation with TGs, but not with LDL-C. In addition, Chen et al¹⁸ found that serum ferritin was independently associated with metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance. It has been inferred that hyperferritinemia may be an additional cause of insulin resistance in T2DM and metabolic syndrome.^19,20

With regard to the relationship between hyperferritinemia and ALT/GGT, as early as the 1990s, dysmetabolic iron-overload syndrome was described as “liver-iron overload” for the first time.²¹ A number of studies^22,23 had shown that iron overload was significantly associated with the severity of nonalcoholic fatty-liver disease (NAFLD) and that serum ferritin was an independent risk factor of NAFLD progression to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Studies by Ruddell et al²⁴ in rat hepatic stellate cells showed that ferritin, as a proinflammatory mediator acting through the nuclear factor-kappa B-signaling pathway, played a potential role in inflammatory processes associated with hepatic fibrogenesis. Yang et al²⁵ reported that subjects with higher dietary iron intake were subject to a higher prevalence of NAFLD in a dose–response manner. Interestingly, their study also found that the association probably only exists in men. Therefore, it can be taken that serum ferritin plays a very important role in the occurrence of chronic liver injury and even cirrhosis in men.

In our study, statistically significant correlations were found between hyperferritinemia and BUN, Cr, and UA levels in men. This finding was similar to Smotra et al,¹³ who found that serum ferritin was positively correlated with the level of serum UA (p<0.05). The underlying mechanism to explain this relationship remains unknown. Nutrition research has shown that red meat is the main source of heme iron, which is the major factor affecting iron load in the body,^26,27 so it may be that the association between red-meat intake and serum ferritin is one of the reasons. The sex-based difference observed in the present study might be explained by the different serum-ferritin levels between men and women. The reasons for this difference in serum ferritin may be²⁸ menstruation and dietary factors.²⁹ However, further mechanisms still need to be revealed.

Association Between Hyperferritinemia and Chronic Complications in Type 2 Diabetes Patients

Our results showed that 70.7% of men and 65.8% of women who had T2DM >5 years with hyperferritinemia had DR, 55.2% of men and 65.8% of women had CHD, both significantly higher than the control population with normal serum ferritin. Interestingly, a relationship between hyperferritinemia and cerebrovascular disease was not found. DR and nephropathy are the most common microvascular complications in T2DM patients. These two complications are characterized by inflammation, microvascular alteration, and neurodegeneration. An overload of iron can cause cell damage through mechanisms involved in increased oxidative stress, activation of inflammatory cytokines, and macrophage infiltration. As such, high ferritin itself may also be responsible for the incidence and development of DR and nephropathy. Studies have explored this relationship. Hsu et al³⁰ showed that hyperferritinemia may be an independent risk factor of nephropathy in patients with T2DM. Wu et al³¹ reported that serum ferritin independently predicts the incidence of chronic kidney disease in patients with T2DM. Our study showed that there was a positive correlation between hyperferritinemia and DR, regardless of sex.

After adjustment for confounding factors, hyperferritinemia remained an independent risk factor of DR. A positive correlation between hyperferritinemia and MAU was found in male subjects (r=0.204, p=0.007). A similar relationship between increased serum ferritin and DR and nephropathy was evident in Smotra et al,¹³ in which persistent hyperglycemia appeared to be the primary factor to explain the association. However, in our study, levels of FPG and HbA_1c in the hyperferritinemia and normal-ferritin group was approximate and the association between hyperferritinemia and DR and MAU independent of glycemic control. Therefore, it can be inferred that increased serum ferritin may be another risk factor of DR or microalbuminuria in patients with T2DM, especially in men.

Possible mechanisms to explain the association have been studied in experimental animalresearch. Chaudhary et al³² found that retinal iron-overload affected integrity of the blood–retina barrier and accelerated retinal cells loss by enhancing oxidative stress and inflammatory signals. Iron overload also induced retinal renin expression. Through these mechanisms, iron overload aggravated the progression of DR in mice. Chaudhary et al³³ reported that renal iron accelerated the progression of diabetic nephropathy in association with renal–renin–angiotensin system activation. These results remain to be confirmed in future clinical research.

Iron may possibly be another additional risk factor involved in cardiovascular disease. However, the evidence for this is still controversial. You et al³⁴ found high levels of L-ferritin in coronary arteries in patients with CHD, indicating that iron had accumulated in atherosclerotic plaques. However, Gill et al³⁵ reported that there was a negative association between high iron status and CHD risk. More evidence is needed for the relationship between iron and CHD. We compared the prevalence of CHD between a hyperferritinemia group and a normal-ferritin group. The association between hyperferritinemia and CHD was also analyzed. The results showed that CHD prevalence in the hyperferritinemia group was significantly higher than the normal-ferritin group. Hyperferritinemia remained an independent risk factor of CHD on logistic regression analysis, consistent with Salonen et al,³⁶ who reported a positive correlation between serum ferritin and acute myocardial infarction in men, and Mokhtari et al,¹² who reported that serum ferritin had significant efficiency to predict CHD (AUC=0.61, p=0.02). Although the exact mechanism of iron-induced atherosclerosis is uncertain, it is likely to be mediated by catalysis of the formation of reactive oxygen species, oxidation of lipoproteins, and vascular dysfunction.³⁷

Nevertheless, when interpreting the findings of the current work, some limitations should be considered. Firstly, this study was cross-sectional study, which allows no conclusions on cause and effect. Secondly, because the sample was relatively small, we could not present data as quartiles/quintiles of ferritin, and this may have limited possible associations. Thirdly, the determination of CHD in subjects in this study was based on typical symptoms, with a lack of objective methods by means of instruments and equipments. Therefore, there may be some deviations between the statistical results and the real values.

Conclusion

The current study showed that hyperferritinemia was related to increased CRP levels and higher prevalence of DR and CHD in T2DM patients. In men, high serum ferritin was also associated with dyslipidemia, hepatic dysfunction, and microalbuminuria. Ferritin may be used as an important biomarker to assess metabolic disorders and the risk of chronic complications in patients with T2DM.

Disclosure

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, or publication of this article.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by Tianjin Major Science and Technology Projects (17ZXMFSY00200) and Tianjin Science and Technology Development Strategy Research Projects (18ZLZXZF00740).