118
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

A review of frovatriptan for the treatment of menstrual migraine

Pages 523-535 | Published online: 21 May 2014

Abstract

The objective of this review is to provide an overview of menstrual migraine (MM) and of frovatriptan and to assess clinical trial data regarding the efficacy and safety of frovatriptan for the acute and short-term prophylaxis of MM. Randomized controlled trials comparing frovatriptan with placebo or a triptan comparator for the acute or prophylactic treatment of MM were selected for review. MM affects up to 60% of women with migraine. Compared with attacks at other times of the cycle, menstrual attacks are longer, more severe, less responsive to treatment, more likely to relapse, and more disabling than attacks at other times of the cycle. No drugs are licensed for acute treatment of MM; triptans are recommended for treatment of moderate to severe attacks for menstrual and nonmenstrual attacks. Perimenstrual prophylaxis is indicated for patients with predictable MM that does not respond to symptomatic treatment alone. Treatment is unlicensed, but options include triptans, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and hormone manipulation. Frovatriptan is distinctive from other triptans due to its long elimination half-life of 26 hours, which confers a longer duration of action. Post hoc analyses from randomized trials of MM show similar pain relief and pain-free rates for frovatriptan compared with other triptans (2 hours pain-free: relative risk [RR] 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91–1.76) but significantly lower relapse rates (24 hours sustained pain-free: RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.18–0.62). Data from randomized controlled trials show a significant reduction in risk of MM in women using frovatriptan 2.5 mg once daily (RR 1.56, 95% CI 1.31–1.86) or twice daily (RR 1.98, 95% CI 1.68–2.34) for perimenstrual prophylaxis compared with placebo. The twice daily dosing was more effective than once daily (RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.11–1.46). These findings support the use of frovatriptan as a first-line acute treatment for MM and for perimenstrual prophylaxis.

Introduction

Frovatriptan is recommended by a number of national guidelines, for the perimenstrual prophylaxis of menstrual attacks in women with pure menstrual migraine (MM) or menstrually related migraine.Citation1Citation7 Although frovatriptan is not licensed for perimenstrual prophylaxis, data from placebo-controlled, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) support its use for this indication. This review provides an overview of MM and of frovatriptan and evaluates the published clinical trial data for frovatriptan use in both the acute treatment and perimenstrual prophylaxis of MM (pure menstrual and menstrually related).

Background

Migraine

Migraine is a primary headache disorder affecting four of every ten women and two of every ten men, mostly before age 35 years.Citation8 By the age of 30 years, migraine is threefold higher in women than in men.Citation9 The effects of migraine on the individual vary considerably from minimal disruption of daily activities to severe disability; in the Global Burden of Disease Survey 2010, migraine was noted to be the third most prevalent disorder and was ranked as the eighth leading cause of years lived with disability worldwide.Citation10

The most common types of migraine are migraine without aura, followed by migraine with aura.Citation11 Attacks typically last 4 to 72 hours, with two or more specific features (unilateral location, pulsating, moderate to severe pain intensity, or aggravation by routine physical activity) during the attack. Migraine attacks are also accompanied by at least one of nausea and/or vomiting, photophobia, and phonophobia.Citation11

Focal neurologic symptoms of migraine aura affect around 30% of patients, who may also experience attacks without aura.Citation12 Typical aura involves any combination of visual, hemisensory, or language abnormalities, with each symptom developing over a minimum of 5 minutes and lasting a maximum of 60 minutes.Citation11 The majority of auras are visual, consisting of a flashing light or an enlarging blind spot rimmed with a shimmering edge or jagged lines in the peripheral vision. Nonvisual auras include spreading unilateral numbness or tingling affecting the face and upper extremities and disturbed thinking or speech. Migraine headache, if present, usually occurs within 1 hour.

Although the timing of attacks is mostly unpredictable, a number of specific factors are recognized as migraine triggers. A retrospective analysis identified stress (80%), hormones in women (65%), not eating (57%), weather (53.2%), and sleep disturbance (50%) as the most commonly reported triggers.Citation13

Menstrual migraine

Menstruation is a significant risk factor for migraine without aura, even in women who have migraine, with or without aura, at other times of the cycle.Citation14Citation18 In population- and clinic-based studies, between 20% and 60% of women with migraine report an association with menstruation.Citation17,Citation19Citation23 Attacks are most likely to occur on or between day −2 and day +3 of bleeding (where day 1 is the start of bleeding).Citation15Citation17,Citation24Citation27 Although some women report a link between migraine attacks and ovulation, this has not been confirmed in epidemiologic studies.Citation17,Citation25,Citation26,Citation28

The International Headache Society recognizes two types of MM: pure MM and menstrually related migraine ().Citation11 The term “MM” is often used to encompass both conditions. For a diagnosis of pure MM, attacks of migraine without aura occur only on or between days −2 to +3 of the cycle, ie, with no attacks at any other time of the cycle, in at least two of three menstrual cycles; for a diagnosis of menstrually related migraine, migraine attacks also occur at other times of the cycle. Diary cards are a prerequisite as relying on the history to confirm the diagnosis can be misleading.Citation20,Citation29 The majority of women with menstrual attacks experience menstrually related migraine; fewer than 10% have pure MM.Citation17,Citation22,Citation23,Citation30

Table 1 International Headache Society classification of menstrual migraine

The perimenstrual increased risk of migraine has been associated with estrogen “withdrawal”, which occurs during the late luteal phase of the natural menstrual cycle and also during the hormone-free interval of combined hormonal contraceptives.Citation26,Citation31Citation35 Estrogen is a neurosteroid, influencing the pain processing networks and vascular endothelium involved in the pathophysiology of migraine. Serotonin-producing neurons are sensitive to the presence or absence of estrogen.Citation36 As serotonin is implicated in migraine pathophysiology, this association with estrogen may account for increased perimenstrual risk of migraine and also for the efficacy of triptans for perimenstrual prophylaxis.

Management of menstrual migraine

No drugs are specifically licensed for the acute or prophylactic treatment of MM.

Acute treatment

Drugs licensed for the acute treatment of migraine are indicated for both nonmenstrual attacks and for migraine attacks associated with menstruation. For the acute treatment of mild to moderate migraine attacks, simple analgesics or oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), often in combination with antiemetics, are recommended. Triptans are indicated for the treatment of moderate or severe attacks. Head-to-head studies do not show superiority of one triptan over any other.Citation37 There is some evidence to recommend a combination of a triptan and an NSAID.Citation38,Citation39 In all cases, treatment should be tailored, taking into account individual preferences, comorbidities, and risk of adverse events (AEs).

Studies conducted using the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD)-2 diagnostic criteriaCitation40 support MM as a distinct clinical entity, with more associated symptoms, longer duration, greater severity, great susceptibility to relapse, greater resistance to treatment, and greater disability than migraine occurring at other times of the menstrual cycle.Citation21,Citation25,Citation26,Citation41Citation45

Prophylaxis

Women who have regular periods and a predictable relationship between migraine and menstruation can be offered short-term perimenstrual prophylaxis. Perimenstrual prophylaxis is particularly suited to those women have inadequate relief from acute therapy. Short-term prevention strategies have the advantage that treatment is only used at the time of need, thus avoiding continuous exposure to active drug and the potential for AEs associated with daily prophylaxis.Citation46 The most commonly recommended strategies include triptans, NSAIDs, and hormone manipulation.Citation47

Frovatriptan

Mechanism of action

The symptoms of headache and allodynia in migraine are thought to arise from activation of the trigeminovascular system and subsequent release of vasoactive neuropeptides, resulting in vasodilation of the meningeal blood vessels, plasma protein extravasation, and sensitization of central trigeminal neurons.Citation48

Frovatriptan, in common with other triptans, is a serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5HT) 1B/1D receptor agonist. Activation of these receptors is thought to relieve the symptoms of migraine through vasoconstriction of distended intracranial extracerebral vessels (by a direct effect on vascular smooth muscle), inhibition of the release of vasoactive neuropeptides by trigeminal terminals innervating the intracranial vessels and dura mater, and inhibition of nociceptive neurotransmission within the trigeminocervical complex in the brainstem and upper spinal cord.Citation49

Frovatriptan also shows moderate affinity with 5HT7 receptors. This results in more potent contraction of cerebral arteries than coronary arteries, with the potential for good efficacy and low risk of unwanted effects. Frovatriptan is distinctive from other triptans due to its long elimination half-life of 26 hours, which confers a longer duration of action.

Efficacy in clinical trials

Pooled data from two large-scale dose-finding studies demonstrated that frovatriptan was effective and well tolerated across a broad dose range of 0.5 mg to 40 mg.Citation50 A dose of 2.5 mg was identified as providing optimal efficacy versus (vs) tolerability.

Frovatriptan 2.5 mg was further evaluated in three large double-blind, placebo-controlled RCTs.Citation51 These were multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group RCTs treating up to three migraine attacks with frovatriptan. Patients included adult men and women with documented 12-month histories of migraine with or without aura as defined by the International Headache Society. The primary efficacy endpoint was 2-hour headache response. In two of the studies, 24-hour headache relapse after a response at 4 hours postdose was an additional primary endpoint.

Frovatriptan was consistently superior to placebo, with headache response at 2 and 4 hours following frovatriptan around twice that for placebo. Among the three studies, the 2-hour headache response (defined as change from moderate or severe headache to mild or none) was 37% to 46% following frovatriptan compared with 21% to 27% for placebo (P<0.001); the 4-hour headache response was 56% to 65% following frovatriptan compared with 31% to 38% for placebo (P<0.001). Pain-free rates at 2 hours were 9% to 14% following frovatriptan compared with 2% to 3% for placebo (P<0.001); the 4-hour pain-free response rate improved to 27% to 32% following frovatriptan compared with 9% to 14% for placebo (P≤0.001).

Associated symptoms of nausea, photophobia, and phonophobia were significantly improved with frovatriptan compared with placebo treatment at 4 hours postdose. No or mild functional impairment was reported by 57% to 64% patients following frovatriptan compared with 36% to 43% for placebo. The median time to meaningful relief of migraine was between 6 and 12 hours following frovatriptan compared with between 14 and 17 hours following placebo.

Recurrence, a major cause of persistent disability among migraineurs, appears to be lower with frovatriptan than with other triptans. In an analysis of all seven triptans, frovatriptan exhibited the lowest mean recurrence rate (17%; range, 7%–25%) ().Citation52

Figure 1 Headache recurrence vs half-life for different triptans, after 2 hours.

Notes: Copyright © 2003, John Wiley and Sons. Reproduced with permission from Géraud G, Keywood C, Senard JM. Migraine headache recurrence: relationship to clinical, pharmacological, and pharmacokinetic properties of triptans. Headache. 2003;43(4):376–388;52 †after 4 hours.
Figure 1 Headache recurrence vs half-life for different triptans, after 2 hours.

About one-third of patients respond within 1.5 hours of dosing, and this response is maintained with long-term use.Citation51,Citation53 Further, early use of frovatriptan results in a higher, earlier, and sustained pain-free response, prevents progression to moderate/severe headache, and reduces pain burden and functional disability.Citation54 The need for fewer doses to treat migraine has significant personal benefits as well as being cost effective.Citation55

Comparison of efficacy with other “triptans”

Three placebo-controlled, two-way crossover RCTs compared frovatriptan 2.5 mg with almotriptan 12.5 mg, rizatriptan 10 mg, or zolmitriptan 2.5 mg.Citation56Citation58 Patients were randomized to frovatriptan or the comparator triptan and were instructed to take treatment as soon as possible after the onset of migraine; a second dose could be taken for lack of response within 2 hours. After treating up to three attacks in no more than 3 months, patients were switched to the other treatment for a further three attacks in no more than 3 months. In the pooled data from the three studies, 346 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis.Citation59 The rate of pain-free episodes at 2 hours was 30% with frovatriptan and 34% with the comparators (P= nonsignificant [NS]); 2-hour pain relief was 55% for frovatriptan and 59% for the comparators (P=NS). Sustained pain-free episodes at 48 hours were also similar between the two groups (22% for frovatriptan vs 21% for the comparators). However, the relapse rate was significantly lower following treatment with frovatriptan (27%) vs the comparators (40%) (P<0.001).

Safety and tolerability

Data from 1,702 patients in two Phase III trials of frovatriptan 2.5 mg for acute migraine attacks and 1,487 women in three Phase III trials of frovatriptan for short-term prophylaxis of MM have been reviewed to assess the safety and tolerability.Citation60 The short-term prophylaxis analysis included data from an open-label, noncomparative study of up to 12 perimenstrual periods (PMPs) treated with frovatriptan.Citation61

The most frequently reported AEs following acute treatment with frovatriptan included nausea, dizziness, fatigue, and headache, which were generally mild or moderate in severity. Similarly, the most frequently reported AEs following perimenstrual prophylaxis with frovatriptan include nausea, dizziness, fatigue, and paresthesia. Results of subgroup analyses of women whose medical histories included comorbidities that might suggest increased cardiovascular risk but who themselves did not have contraindications to frovatriptan, provide preliminary evidence of safety of frovatriptan in this population.

In a direct comparative study, frovatriptan was better tolerated than sumatriptan 100 mg.Citation62 In comparative studies with almotriptan, rizatriptan, and zolmitriptan, fewer drug-related AEs were reported following treatment with frovatriptan (P<0.05), particularly cardiovascular symptoms.Citation59

Drug interactions

Frovatriptan is metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP)1A2 but does not inhibit or induce this or other CYP isoenzymes. Hence, the risks of interactions with concomitantly administered drugs are low. In women using combined oral contraceptives (COCs), blood levels of frovatriptan are around 30% higher compared with nonusers, but there is no evidence to support dose adjustment when frovatriptan is used concomitantly with COCs.Citation63

Concomitant use of frovatriptan with any other triptans, ergotamine, or ergotamine derivatives is contraindicated because of the risk of hypertension and coronary artery constriction due to additive vasospastic effects. It is recommended to wait at least 24 hours after any of these drugs before taking frovatriptan and vice versa.

Although frovatriptan is not a substrate for monoamine oxidase (MAO)-A, concomitant use of MAO inhibitors is not recommended since the potential risk of serotonin syndrome or hypertension cannot be excluded. Concomitant use of St John’s wort is also not recommended because of the variability of the potency of different St John’s wort products as marketed and the potential risk of serotonin syndrome.

Contraindications

In line with other triptans, frovatriptan is contraindicated for patients with heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, moderately severe/severe or uncontrolled mild hypertension, severe hepatic impairment, or those with previous history of transient ischemic attack or cerebrovascular accident.

Rationale for perimenstrual dosing regimens

A double blind, placebo-controlled, two-period crossover RCT in healthy premenopausal women (COC and non-COC users) compared 6-day courses of once-daily (QD) and twice-daily (BID) dosing with frovatriptan. Treatment was started 2 days before the anticipated start of a MM headache, in order to have target blood levels of frovatriptan. A loading double-dose was given on the first dosing day, in order to achieve effective blood levels more rapidly: frovatriptan QD (5 mg day 1 and 2.5 mg days 2–6) and BID (5 mg [10 mg total] day 1; 2.5 mg [5 mg total] days 2–6).Citation64 The time to maximum blood concentration was between 2–4 hours. Both frovatriptan regimens achieved steady-state therapeutic blood concentrations by day 2 of treatment. BID dosing maintained more consistent drug concentrations than did QD dosing and was well tolerated.

Search strategy

A literature search strategy was developed for Ovid MEDLINE and PubMed (January 2000 to December 2013), MEDLINE (R) In-Process and other non-indexed citations, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials using the following search terms: “frovatriptan”, “migraine”, “headache”, “menstruation*”, “menstrual migraine”, “menstrually-related migraine”, “controlled clinical trial”, and “randomized controlled trial”. References of the articles identified were also searched. The authors were contacted for additional data, as required.

For inclusion in the review, studies were required to: be written in English; be described as a prospective study with a contemporaneous placebo, untreated, or active treatment control group; diagnose study participants according to the ICHD; and involve the use of frovatriptan as acute or perimenstrual prophylactic treatment.

In crossover studies, only data from the first cycle of treatment were considered, to minimize carryover and dropout effects.

The literature search identified 12 clinical trials, eight relating to acute treatment of MM and four relating to perimenstrual prophylaxis.

Frovatriptan for the acute treatment of menstrual migraine

Included in the review are three post hoc analyses of menstrual attacks of migraine from RCTs of frovatriptan vs active comparators, for the acute treatment of migraine,Citation65Citation67 one study analyzing the same data pooled from the three trials,Citation68 and one post hoc analysis of the pooled data in women with oral contraceptive-induced migraine (OCM).Citation69

Of other trials for the acute treatment of menstrual attacks of migraine not included in the review, there was one non-comparator study of frovatriptan combined with an NSAID,Citation39 one post hoc analysis of an open-label post-marketing surveillance study,Citation70 and one open-label study of women with OCM.Citation71

The three post hoc analyses were of multicenter, double-blind, crossover RCTs of treatment with each trial medication for up to three menstrual attacks within 3 months.Citation56Citation58 Data from women with attacks of migraine without aura occurring on day 1±2 days (ie, days −2 to +3) of menstruation (contraceptive and natural cycles) during the studies were included in the post hoc analyses. Of all women with a menstrual cycle, 24%, 17%, and 32% menstrual attacks occurred in frovatriptan vs almotriptan, rizatriptan, and zolmitriptan studies, respectively. The mean age of the menstruating women was 36±8 years compared with a mean age of 38±10 years in the main studies.

There were no significant between-group differences in pain relief or pain-free response at 2, 4, and 24 hours (, and ). There were significant differences between frovatriptan and almotriptan, rizatriptan, and zolmitriptan for 24-hour relapse (), 24-hour and 48-hour sustained pain-free response (), 24-hour and 48-hour sustained pain-free response (), and 24-hour and 48-hour relapse ( and ). Compared with the comparator triptans, the number needed to treat (NNT) for frovatriptan was 7.6 (4.8 to 17.1) for relapse at 24 hours, 3.0 (2.0 to 6.3) for relapse at 24 hours following pain-free response at 2 hours, 8.6 (5.1 to 26.2) for relapse at 48 hours, and 4.0 (2.4 to 10.8) for relapse at 48 hours following pain-free response at 2 hours.

Figure 2 Pain relief following treatment with frovatriptan versus almotriptan, rizatriptan, or zolmitriptan.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; df, degrees of freedom; M-H, Mantel-Haenszel.
Figure 2 Pain relief following treatment with frovatriptan versus almotriptan, rizatriptan, or zolmitriptan.

Figure 3 Pain-free response following treatment with frovatriptan versus almotriptan, rizatriptan, or zolmitriptan.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; df, degrees of freedom; M-H, Mantel-Haenszel.
Figure 3 Pain-free response following treatment with frovatriptan versus almotriptan, rizatriptan, or zolmitriptan.

Figure 4 Relapse following 2-hour pain-free response after treatment with frovatriptan versus almotriptan, rizatriptan, or zolmitriptan.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; df, degrees of freedom; M-H, Mantel-Haenszel.
Figure 4 Relapse following 2-hour pain-free response after treatment with frovatriptan versus almotriptan, rizatriptan, or zolmitriptan.

Table 2 Clinical trials of frovatriptan for acute treatment of menstrual migraine: post hoc analyses of three placebo-controlled RCTs

There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of attacks associated with drug-related AEs between frovatriptan (5%) and the comparator triptans (4%).

In the subgroup analysis of OCMM, the mean age of women with OCMM was 35±9 years compared with 34±7 years for women with non-OCMM.Citation69 There were no statistically significant differences between frovatriptan and comparator triptans for pain relief at 2 and 24 hours, and for pain-free response at 2 hours; significantly more women treated with frovatriptan were pain-free at 24 hours and had lower relapse rates at 24 and 48 hours ().

Frovatriptan for perimenstrual prophylaxis of menstrual migraine

Two RCTs of frovatriptan vs placebo for perimenstrual prophylaxis of MMCitation72,Citation73 and one post hoc efficacy analysisCitation74 were included in the review. An open-label comparator study was not reviewed.Citation75

In a double blind, placebo-controlled, three-way crossover RCT, 579 women with MM treated each of three PMPs with frovatriptan 2.5 mg QD, frovatriptan 2.5 mg BID, and placebo.Citation72 In this study, which predated ICHD-2, MM was defined as migraine occurring between days −2 and +4 of menstruation, where day 1 is the first day of menstruation. Treatment was started 2 days before the anticipated MM attack and taken for 6 days. The primary endpoint was incidence of MM headache during the treated PMP. Secondary endpoints were severity and duration of MM headache, incidence of MM-associated symptoms, severity of functional disability, use of rescue medication, and patient rating of study drug effectiveness.

Women migraineurs aged 18 years were eligible if they had MM during at least three of four PMPs in the previous year and had at least a 1-year history of MM. They also had to have regular menstrual cycles (28±4 days) and be able to predict the onset of MM attacks. Treatment was taken BID for 6 days, starting on days −4 to +2 of menstruation. On the first day of dosing, women received a double-loading dose of study medication.

The mean age of the study population was 37.6 years (range 18–56). The incidence of MM was significantly reduced with both frovatriptan QD and BID vs placebo and for BID vs QD (). Both frovatriptan regimens were associated with reduced MM severity (P<0.0001), duration (P<0.0001), and the use of rescue medication (P<0.01 [QD] and P<0.0001 [BID]).

Table 3 Clinical trials of frovatriptan for perimenstrual prophylaxis

The incidence and type of AEs were similar to placebo for both regimens. The overall incidence of AEs was 2.7% higher than placebo for frovatriptan QD and 4.1% higher than placebo for frovatriptan BID. The most commonly reported AEs were headache, nausea, dizziness, nasopharyngitis, and dysmenorrhea.

Combined hormonal contraceptives, used by 31% of the study population, did not affect efficacy or tolerability.

Survival analysis of the proportion of patients without migraine headache showed no evidence of delayed or rebound headache following any of the three treatment periods.

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group RCT, 427 women with “difficult to treat” MM treated two consecutive PMPs with placebo; those who experienced MM attacks in at least one of two single-blind PMPs were randomized to treat three PMPs over a 4-month period with either frovatriptan 2.5 mg QD, frovatriptan 2.5 mg BID, or placebo ().Citation73

Difficult to treat migraine was defined as previous exposure to nontriptan acute and/or prophylactic therapy for treatment of MM and an inadequate response to triptans for the acute treatment of MM over a minimum of two menstrual cycles. An inadequate response to triptans was defined as lack of efficacy or poor tolerability, doses in excess of the maximum recommended amount, the need for rescue medication, relapse of headache within 48 hours, or incomplete response. During PMP dosing, women could take one additional frovatriptan dose per day, except with the loading dose on the first treatment day.

The efficacy analysis included 410 women with a mean age of 38.1 (range 16–58) years; 85% completed three double-blind PMPs.

Frovatriptan was associated with more headache-free days compared with placebo (4.2 [BID] and 4.0 [QD] vs 3.6 [placebo]) (P≤0.0001). Headache severity was reduced with frovatriptan QD (P≤0.01) and BID (P≤0.001) vs placebo. Associated symptoms of photophobia and phonophobia were decreased with frovatriptan QD and BID (P<0.01); nausea was reduced with BID dosing (P<0.001).

Over all treated PMPs, the percentage of patients with functional impairment was decreased with frovatriptan compared with placebo (71% [BID] and 78% [QD] vs 93% [placebo]) (P<0.001).

Both frovatriptan regimens were equally well tolerated. Possible or probably related AEs were reported by 32% of patients taking frovatriptan QD, 24% taking BID, and 19% placebo. The most commonly reported AEs were upper respiratory tract infection, nausea, and dizziness. The incidence of severe AEs was low and appeared unrelated to treatment. One patient in the placebo group had an inguinal hernia, and another patient randomized to placebo experience prolonged chest discomfort, which resolved with ranitidine.

Kaplan–Meier analysis of the time to first migraine during the PMP and in the 5 days immediately following dosing showed no evidence of delayed or rebound headache following treatment.

COCs were used by 30% of women taking frovatriptan 2.5 mg QD, 24% taking frovatriptan 2.5 mg BID, and 35% taking placebo. There was no difference in outcome in COC users compared to overall study population.

In a combined analysis of the two trials, both frovatriptan 2.5 mg QD and BID were more effective than placebo in reducing migraine frequency (). The NNT was 4.2 (3.5 to 5.4) for frovatriptan 2.5 mg QD vs placebo, 4.2 (3.5 to 5.4) for frovatriptan 2.5 mg BID vs placebo, and 9.0 (6.0 to 17.8) for frovatriptan 2.5 mg BID vs QD.

Figure 5 Perimenstrual prophylaxis with frovatriptan: incidence of no migraine occurring during the treated perimenstrual period.

Abbreviations: BID, twice daily; CI, confidence interval; df, degrees of freedom; QD, once daily; M-H, Mantel-Haenszel; vs, versus.
Figure 5 Perimenstrual prophylaxis with frovatriptan: incidence of no migraine occurring during the treated perimenstrual period.

Conclusion

MM is a common and disabling condition. The specific characteristics of MM attacks, particularly the longer duration and increased relapse rate compared with non-MM attacks, present challenges for treatment efficacy.

Post hoc analyses from RCTs of menstrual attacks of migraine show similar pain relief and pain-free rates for frovatriptan compared with other triptans but significantly lower relapse rates and sustained pain-free response rates at both 24 hours and 48 hours postdosing.

Data from RCTs for perimenstrual prophylaxis show a significant reduction in risk of MM in women using frovatriptan 2.5 mg QD or BID for 6 days compared with placebo, with no evidence of delayed or rebound headache following treatment.

Across all clinical trials, frovatriptan was well tolerated, with a low incidence of drug-related AEs.

These findings support the use of frovatriptan as a first-line treatment for both the acute treatment and for perimenstrual prophylaxis of MM.

Disclosure

Professor MacGregor has acted as a paid consultant to and/or her department has received research funding from Addex Therapeutics, Allergan, AstraZeneca, Bayer Healthcare, BTG International Limited, Endo Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmithKline, the Menarini Group, Merck and Co, Pozen, and UniPath. The author reports no other conflicts of interest in this work.

References

  • SilbersteinSDHollandSFreitagFDodickDWArgoffCAshmanEQuality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Headache SocietyEvidence-based guideline update: pharmacologic treatment for episodic migraine prevention in adults: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Headache SocietyNeurology201278171337134522529202
  • nice.org.uk [homepage on the Internet]Headaches: diagnosis and management of headaches in young people and adultsClinical Guideline, CG150National Institute of Clinical Excellence2012 [updated August 22, 2013; cited January 3, 2014]. Available from: http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG150Accessed April 8, 2014
  • MacGregorEASteinerTJDaviesPTGGuidelines for All Healthcare Professionals in the Diagnosis and Management of Migraine, Tension-Type Headache, Cluster Headache, and Medication-Overuse HeadacheHullBritish Association for the Study of Headache2010 Available from: http://www.bash.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/10102-BASH-Guidelines-update-2_v5-1-indd.pdfAccessed April 8, 2014
  • BendtsenLBirkSKaschHDanish Headache SocietyReference programme: diagnosis and treatment of headache disorders and facial pain. Danish Headache Society2nd ed 2012J Headache Pain201213Suppl 1S1S2922270537
  • Lanteri-MinetMValadeDGéraudGLucasCDonnetASociété française d’étude des migraines et des céphaléesGuidelines for the diagnosis and management of migraine in adults and childrenRev Neurol (Paris)201316911429 French23246266
  • SarchielliPGranellaFPrudenzanoMPItalian guidelines for primary headaches: 2012 revised versionJ Headache Pain201213Suppl 2S31S7022581120
  • EversSAfraJFreseAEuropean Federation of Neurological SocietiesEFNS guideline on the drug treatment of migraine – revised report of an EFNS task forceEur J Neurol200916996898119708964
  • StewartWFWoodCReedMLRoyJLiptonRBAMPP Advisory GroupCumulative lifetime migraine incidence in women and menCephalalgia200828111170117818644028
  • VictorTWHuXCampbellJCBuseDCLiptonRBMigraine prevalence by age and sex in the United States: a life-span studyCephalalgia20103091065107220713557
  • VosTFlaxmanADNaghaviMYears lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010Lancet201238098592163219623245607
  • Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS)The International Classification of Headache Disorders3rd ed (beta version)Cephalalgia201333962980823771276
  • StewartWFLinetMSCelentanoDDVan NattaMZieglerDAge- and sex-specific incidence rates of migraine with and without visual auraAm J Epidemiol199113410111111201746521
  • KelmanLThe triggers or precipitants of the acute migraine attackCephalalgia200727539440217403039
  • WöberCBrannathWSchmidtKPAMINA Study GroupProspective analysis of factors related to migraine attacks: the PAMINA studyCephalalgia200727430431417376107
  • RasmussenBKOlesenJMigraine with aura and migraine without aura: an epidemiological studyCephalalgia19921242212281525797
  • JohannesCBLinetMSStewartWFCelentanoDDLiptonRBSzkloMRelationship of headache to phase of the menstrual cycle among young women: a daily diary studyNeurology1995456107610827783866
  • MacGregorEAChiaHVohrahRCWilkinsonMMigraine and menstruation: a pilot studyCephalalgia19901063053102289231
  • GranellaFSancesGPucciENappiREGhiottoNNappGMigraine with aura and reproductive life events: a case control studyCephalalgia200020870170711167898
  • VetvikKGMacgregorEALundqvistCRussellMBPrevalence of menstrual migraine: A population-based studyCephalalgia201434428028824101732
  • MacGregorEAIgarashiHWilkinsonMHeadaches and hormones: subjective versus objective assessmentHeadache Quarterly19978126136
  • CouturierEGBomhofMANevenAKvan DuijnNPMenstrual migraine in a representative Dutch population sample: prevalence, disability and treatmentCephalalgia200323430230812716349
  • GranellaFSancesGZanferrariCCostaAMartignoniEManzoniGCMigraine without aura and reproductive life events: a clinical epidemiological study in 1300 womenHeadache19933373853898376100
  • MacGregorEABrandesJEikermannAGiammarcoRImpact of migraine on patients and their families: the Migraine And Zolmitriptan Evaluation (MAZE) survey – Phase IIICurr Med Res Opin20042071143115015265259
  • StewartWFLiptonRBCheeESawyerJSilbersteinSDMenstrual cycle and headache in a population sample of migraineursNeurology200055101517152311094107
  • MacGregorEAHackshawAPrevalence of migraine on each day of the natural menstrual cycleNeurology200463235135315277635
  • MacGregorEAFrithAEllisJAspinallLHackshawAIncidence of migraine relative to menstrual cycle phases of rising and falling estrogenNeurology200667122154215816971700
  • CupiniLMMatteisMTroisiECalabresiPBernardiGSilvestriniMSex-hormone-related events in migrainous females. A clinical comparative study between migraine with aura and migraine without auraCephalalgia19951521401447641250
  • RussellMBRasmussenBKFengerKOlesenJMigraine without aura and migraine with aura are distinct clinical entities: a study of four hundred and eighty-four male and female migraineurs from the general populationCephalalgia19961642392458792035
  • DowsonAJMassiouHAuroraSKManaging migraine headaches experienced by patients who self-report with menstrually related migraine: a prospective, placebo-controlled study with oral sumatriptanJ Headache Pain200562818716362647
  • VetvikKGMacGregorEALundqvistCRussellMBSelf-reported menstrual migraine in the general populationJ Headache Pain2010112879220186561
  • MacgregorEAHackshawAPrevention of migraine in the pill-free interval of combined oral contraceptives: a double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study using natural oestrogen supplementsJ Fam Plann Reprod Health Care2002281273116259812
  • LichtenEMLichtenJBWhittyAPieperDThe confirmation of a biochemical marker for women’s hormonal migraine: the depo-estradiol challenge testHeadache19963663673718707555
  • SomervilleBWThe role of estradiol withdrawal in the etiology of menstrual migraineNeurology19722243553655062827
  • SomervilleBWEstrogen-withdrawal migraine. I. Duration of exposure required and attempted prophylaxis by premenstrual estrogen administrationNeurology19752532392441167630
  • SomervilleBWEstrogen-withdrawal migraine. II. Attempted prophylaxis by continuous estradiol administrationNeurology19752532452501167631
  • McEwanBEstrogen actions throughout the brainRecent Prog Horm Res20025735738412017552
  • MettATfelt-HansenPAcute migraine therapy: recent evidence from randomized comparative trialsCurr Opin Neurol200821333133718451718
  • BrandesJLKudrowDStarkSRSumatriptan-naproxen for acute treatment of migraine: a randomized trialJAMA2007297131443145417405970
  • AllaisGRolandoSSchiapparelliPFrovatriptan plus dexketoprofen in the treatment of menstrually related migraine: an open studyNeurol Sci201334Suppl 1S179S18123695075
  • Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society (IHS)The International Classification of Headache Disorders2nd edCephalalgia200424Suppl 1S1S160
  • GranellaFSancesGAllaisGCharacteristics of menstrual and nonmenstrual attacks in women with menstrually related migraine referred to headache centresCephalalgia200424970771615315526
  • MacGregorEAVictorTWHuXCharacteristics of menstrual vs nonmenstrual migraine: a post hoc, within-woman analysis of the usual-care phase of a nonrandomized menstrual migraine clinical trialHeadache201050452853820236340
  • PinkermanBHolroydKMenstrual and nonmenstrual migraines differ in women with menstrually-related migraineCephalalgia201030101187119420855364
  • Lieba-SamalDWöberCFrantalSPAMINA study groupHeadache, menstruation and combined oral contraceptives: a diary study in 184 women with migraineEur J Pain201115885285721402485
  • DowsonAJKilminsterSGSaltRClarkMBundyMJDisability associated with headaches occurring inside and outside the menstrual period in those with migraine: a general practice studyHeadache200545427428215836563
  • BrandesJLThe influence of estrogen on migraine: a systematic reviewJAMA2006295151824183016622144
  • MacGregorEAPrevention and treatment of menstrual migraineDrugs201070141799181820836574
  • TepperSJRapoportAMSheftellFDMechanisms of action of the 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonistsArch Neurol20025971084108812117355
  • GoadsbyPJSerotonin receptors and the acute attack of migraineClin Neurosci19985118239523053
  • RapoportARyanRGoldsteinJKeywoodCDose range-finding studies with frovatriptan in the acute treatment of migraineHeadache200242Suppl 2S74S8312028323
  • RyanRGéraudGGoldsteinJCadyRKeywoodCClinical efficacy of frovatriptan: placebo-controlled studiesHeadache200242Suppl 2S84S9212028324
  • GéraudGKeywoodCSenardJMMigraine headache recurrence: relationship to clinical, pharmacological, and pharmacokinetic properties of triptansHeadache200343437638812656709
  • SpieringsELKeywoodCRapid responders to frovatriptan in acute migraine treatment: results from a long-term, open-label studyPain Med200910463363819453958
  • CadyRElkindAGoldsteinJKeywoodCRandomized, placebo-controlled comparison of early use of frovatriptan in a migraine attack versus dosing after the headache has become moderate or severeCurr Med Res Opin20042091465147215383196
  • LisottoCGuidottiMZavaDSaviLFrovatriptan and rizatriptan economic EVAluation: the FREEVA studyJ Headache Pain2013149624330707
  • SaviLOmboniSLisottoCA double-blind, randomized, multicenter, Italian study of frovatriptan versus rizatriptan for the acute treatment of migraineJ Headache Pain201112221922620686810
  • BartoliniMGiamberardinoMALisottoCA double-blind, randomized, multicenter, Italian study of frovatriptan versus almotriptan for the acute treatment of migraineJ Headache Pain201112336136821437714
  • TulloVAllaisGFerrariMDFrovatriptan versus zolmitriptan for the acute treatment of migraine: a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, Italian studyNeurol Sci201031Suppl 1S51S5420464583
  • CortelliPAllaisGTulloVFrovatriptan versus other triptans in the acute treatment of migraine: pooled analysis of three double-blind, randomized, cross-over, multicenter, Italian studiesNeurol Sci201132Suppl 1S95S9821533722
  • MacGregorEAPawseySPCampbellJCHuXSafety and tolerability of frovatriptan in the acute treatment of migraine and prevention of menstrual migraine: Results of a new analysis of data from five previously published studiesGend Med2010728810820435272
  • MacGregorEABrandesJLSilbersteinSSafety and tolerability of short-term preventive frovatriptan: a combined analysisHeadache20094991298131419788471
  • GéraudGSpieringsELKeywoodCTolerability and safety of frovatriptan with short- and long-term use for treatment of migraine and in comparison with sumatriptanHeadache200242Suppl 2S93S9912028325
  • BuchanPWadeAWardCOliverSDStewartAJFreestoneSFrovatriptan: a review of drug-drug interactionsHeadache200242Suppl 2S63S7312028322
  • WadeAPawseySWhaleHBoyceMWarringtonSPharmacokinetics of two 6-day frovatriptan dosing regimens used for the short-term prevention of menstrual migraine: A phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-period crossover, single-centre study in healthy female volunteersClin Drug Investig2009295325337
  • AllaisGTulloVBenedettoCZavaDOmboniSBussoneGEfficacy of frovatriptan in the acute treatment of menstrually related migraine: analysis of a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, Italian, comparative study versus zolmitriptanNeurol Sci201132Suppl 1S99S10421533723
  • BartoliniMGiamberardinoMALisottoCFrovatriptan versus almotriptan for acute treatment of menstrual migraine: analysis of a double-blind, randomized, cross-over, multicenter, Italian, comparative studyJ Headache Pain201213540140622592864
  • SaviLOmboniSLisottoCEfficacy of frovatriptan in the acute treatment of menstrually related migraine: analysis of a double-blind, randomized, cross-over, multicenter, Italian, comparative study versus rizatriptanJ Headache Pain201112660961521842274
  • AllaisGTulloVOmboniSEfficacy of frovatriptan versus other triptans in the acute treatment of menstrual migraine: pooled analysis of three double-blind, randomized, crossover, multicenter studiesNeurol Sci201233Suppl 1S65S6922644174
  • AllaisGTulloVOmboniSFrovatriptan vs other triptans for the acute treatment of oral contraceptive-induced menstrual migraine: pooled analysis of three double-blind, randomized, crossover, multicenter studiesNeurol Sci201334Suppl 1S83S8623695052
  • NewmanLCHarperSJonesBACampbellJFrovatriptan for acute treatment of migraine associated with menstruation: results from an open-label postmarketing surveillance studyJ Womens Health (Larchmt)20091881265127319627225
  • AllaisGBussoneGAirolaGOral contraceptive-induced menstrual migraine. Clinical aspects and response to frovatriptanNeurol Sci200829Suppl 1S186S19018545931
  • SilbersteinSDElkindAHSchreiberCKeywoodCA randomized trial of frovatriptan for the intermittent prevention of menstrual migraineNeurology200463226126915277618
  • BrandesJLPooleACKallelaMShort-term frovatriptan for the prevention of difficult-to-treat menstrual migraine attacksCephalalgia200929111133114819811503
  • SilbersteinSDBernerTTobinJXiangQCampbellJCScheduled short-term prevention with frovatriptan for migraine occurring exclusively in association with menstruationHeadache20094991283129719751371
  • GuidottiMMauriMBarrilàCGuidottiFBelloniCFrovatriptan vs transdermal oestrogens or naproxen sodium for the prophylaxis of menstrual migraineJ Headache Pain20078528328817955167