283
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

The old and new therapeutic approaches to the treatment of giardiasis: Where are we?

, &
Pages 273-287 | Published online: 07 Dec 2022

Abstract

Giardia lamblia is the causative agent of giardiasis, one of the most common parasitic infections of the human intestinal tract. This disease most frequently affects children causing abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, acute or chronic diarrhea, and malabsorption syndrome. In undernourished children, giardiasis is a determining factor in retarded physical and mental development. Antigiardial chemotherapy focuses on the trophozoite stage. Metronidazole and other nitroimidazoles have been used for decades as the therapy of choice against giardiasis. In recent years many other drugs have been proposed for the treatment of giardiasis. Therefore, several synthetic and natural substances have been tested in search of new giardicidal compounds. This study is a review of drugs used in in vitro and in vivo tests, and also drugs tested in clinical trials (nonrandomized and randomized).

Introduction

Giardia lamblia (syn. Giardia intestinalis, Giardia duodenalis) is a flagellate protozoan which may be found infecting the human small intestine, causing a disease called giardiasis. The symptomatology of human giardiasis is extremely variable, many individuals have the asymptomatic form while some have abdominal pain, nausea, acute or chronic diarrhea – which may last several months, malabsorption and weight loss.Citation1Citation3 The clinical impact seems to be stronger in the first three years of life and in undernourished or immunodeficient individuals.Citation4 G. lamblia has often been pointed out as the cause of growth disorders among children,Citation3 also with the presence and frequency of diarrhea, for as long as the infection lasts, and the opportunity of reinfection, all constituting essential factors behind children’s physical and mental debilitation.Citation5

G. lamblia is found in mammals, including human beings, cats, dogs, beavers, and cattle. Giardiasis is transmitted by the ingestion of cysts present in food and water; water dissemination being easier due to cysts resistance to chlorination.Citation6,Citation7 Cysts are highly infectious to men. Human volunteers have been experimentally infected with as few as 10 cysts.Citation8 These cysts may remain viable in the environment for up to three months under favorable conditions of temperature and humidity. Three aspects are important in the epidemiological context of the disease: the cysts’ resistance to the environment, the amount of cysts eliminated by the patients, and the zoonotic aspect of the disease.Citation9

Epidemics, in developed countries, have been attributed to an inappropriate water treatment, to its contamination with human or animal feces, particularly in surface water collections and lakes.Citation9 Direct transmission from person to person is another infection mechanism, particularly important in collective institutions, such as daycare centers and orphanages, among members of the same family, and between male homosexual partners.Citation10 In these populations, giardiasis reaches epidemic levels. G. lamblia has a cosmopolitan distribution with an estimated number of 2.8 × 108 cases of infections per year and is thus the most common intestinal parasite in humans in developed countries.Citation11 In Asia, Africa, and Latin America, about 200 million people have symptomatic giardiasis with some 500,000 new cases reported each year.Citation12 In those countries this disease should be observed carefully, for it contributes substantially to generating mentally and physically impaired adults.

Thompson and colleaguesCitation13 reviewed publications by several authors who reported genetic variations among Giardia samples isolated from human beings. Such differences are believed to significantly influence giardiasis epidemiology and control, particularly for host susceptibility, virulence, drug sensitivity, antigenicity, and in vivo and in vitro development.Citation5 Although some advances have been observed in isolating and characterizing Giardia samples, there are few studies regarding this parasite`s chemotherapy.Citation14 Resistance to different drugs used in the treatment of this disease has been reported and the number of cases is likely to increase.Citation15Citation17

A variety of chemotherapeutic agents such as 5-nitroimidazole compounds, quinacrine, furazolidone, paromomycin, benzimidazole compounds, nitazoxanide have been used in the therapy for giardiasis. Nevertheless, therapeutic regimens and therapy reviews are little explored. Most drugs used have considerable adverse effects and, most of the time, they are contraindicated.Citation18Citation20 Furthermore, Giardia seems to have a great ability to resist these agents.Citation17,Citation19,Citation21,Citation22

In this context, the study of new chemotherapeutic agents plays a fundamental role – along with the reviews of the actually used drugs – in the rationale for treatment of giardiasis on the basis of more consistent data.

Many compounds have shown giardicidal activity in in vivo models or in animal models. In the present review, we have systematically addressed the main in vitro and in vivo studies and prospective trials in human population concerning the treatment of giardiasis.

Methodology

This is a review of giardiasis treatment in which we analyze the quality of the studies published in the Medline, PubMed, and EMBASE databases from 1966 to September, 2008.

Concentrating only on studies published in English, for each class of study (see below), we looked up the following key words in various combinations: giardia, giardiasis, treatment, therapeutic, therapy, drug, medication, phytotherapy, and chemotherapy. In those studies performed in humans, we did not have an age limit and searched for children and adult patients.

The studies were divided into four classes. Group I: in vitro studies; group II: in vivo studies; group III: clinical trials, nonrandomized, controlled or not; group IV: randomized control trials (RCT), blinded or not.

Inclusion criteria

We included the following studies: In vitro studies consisting of studies that tested the sensitivity and efficacy of the drugs against Giardia; In vivo studies consisting of studies that tested the efficacy of drugs against Giardia in experimental animals; Nonrandomized clinical trials consisting of studies that tested the efficacy of drugs against Giardia in humans; Randomized controlled clinical trials (RCT) consisting of studies designed to compare the efficacy between different drugs, between drugs and placebo, or to compare different schemes of the same drug in humans. These studies were necessarily randomized and controlled, but not necessarily blinded.

This review was made using two independent reviewers following the same inclusion criteria for searching the articles simultaneously. After they were finished, the reviews were analyzed. Those articles showing up in two reviews were automatically included in the final analysis. The remaining nonconsensual studies were analyzed by a third reviewer for a final decision as to include or exclude an article after the discussion between the first two reviewers was exhausted.

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (confidence interval [CI]), absolute numbers, or percentages. Comparisons between rates of cure of drugs were made using the chi-squared or the Student t-test methods. Only variables with p < 0.05 were considered significant.

Main results

In the initial search, 116 in vitro studies, 48 in vivo studies, 87 nonrandomized clinical trials, and 47 RCT were found. After selection for the inclusion criteria, 39 in vitro studies, nine in vivo studies, 23 nonrandomized clinical trials, and 34 RCTs remained ().

Table 1 In vitro studies

Table 4 randomized controlled clinical trials

In the 39 in vitro studies selected, 55 drugs were tested, 53 (96.4%) showed activity against giardia. Eighteen studies (46.2%) did not have comparative design with other drugs. Twenty-one studies (53.8%) compared activity between drugs: 11 (52.4%) compared activity between two drugs, and 10 (47.6%) compared activity between three or more drugs.

The most frequently tested drugs in in vitro studies were: metronidazole (nine studies, 16.4%), albendazole (five studies, 9.1%), furazolidone (four studies, 7.3%), azitromicyn, nitazoxanide, phenyl-carbamate derivatives, tinidazole, and kaempferol (two studies each, 3.6%). The other drugs had one study each ().

Table 5 In vitro studies: drugs more frequently tested

In the nine in vivo studies selected in which nine drugs were tested, eight (88.9%) showed activity against Giardia. One of them compared the efficacy between two drugs (11.1%), and the remaining study tested just one drug ().

Table 2 In vivo studies

Out of the 23 nonrandomized clinical trials, six studies (26.1%) had design to compare efficacy between drugs, three (13%) compared different schemes of the same drug, and three (13%) compared efficacy between one drug and placebo (nonrandomized). Eleven studies evaluated the effect of one drug without comparing either dosages or efficacy between drugs (see ).

Table 3 Nonrandomized clinical trials

Twelve drugs have been tested in the 23 nonrandomized clinical trials, with an average sample size of 83.3 ± 53.3 patients per study (confidence interval [CI] = 57.2 to 109.4). The mean general rate of cure (RC) per drug was 85.5% ± 16.7 (CI = 80.0 to 91.0). The most frequently tested drugs were: metronidazole (nine studies, 39.1%), tinidazole (seven studies, 30.4%), ornidazole, and quinacrine (three studies each, 13%), secnidazole, furazolidone, and berberine (two studies each, 8.7%) (). In evaluating drug effectiveness, the following mean rates of cure were found: secnidazole (RC = 96% ± 2.8), ornidazole (RC = 93.6% ± 1.2), tinidazole (RC = 89.1% ± 8.8), quinacrine (RC = 85% ± 21.6), furazolidone (RC = 82% ± 14), and metronidazole (RC = 76.6% ± 20.6) (). The metronidazole was the most studied and tested drug for the giardiasis treatment. This drug had greater efficacy in larger doses and in more prolonged regimes (5 to 10 days), and achieved a cure rate of 87% to 100% in these schemes ().

Table 7 Drugs more frequently tested in nonrandomized clinical trials

Table 8 Mean rate of cure of drugs more tested in nonrandomized clinical trials

Table 9 More effective doses of drugs tested in nonrandomized clinical trials

Out of the 34 RCTs selected for analysis, 23 studies (67.6%) had design to compare efficacy between drugs, five (14.7%) compared different schemes of the same drug, and five (14.7%) compared efficacy between one drug and placebo (randomized). One study tested a drug without comparing it with any other drug or placebo. Eight studies (23.5%) were double-blind studies, five (62.5%) compared one drug with placebo, while three (37.5%) compared the efficacy between drugs.

Eighteen drugs were tested on the 34 RCTs. The average sample size was 98.9 ± 38.0 patients per study (CI = 83.7 to 114.1). The mean general rate of cure per drug was 83.0% ± 16.1 (CI = 78.4 to 87.6). Interestingly, the mean rate of cure of the placebo was 25%.

There was no significant difference either in the sample size/patient relationship or in the rate of cure observed between nonrandomized and RCTs studies (83.3 × 98.9 patients/study and 85.5% × 83.0%; p > 0.05).

The most frequently tested drugs in RCTs were: metronidazole (21 studies, 61.8%), tinidazole (10 studies, 29.4%), albendazole (nine studies, 26.5%), mebendazole (eight studies, 23.5%), ornidazole, furazolidone, and nitazoxanide (three studies each, 8.8%) ().

Table 10 Drugs more frequently tested in randomized control clinical trials

Among drugs showing greater effectiveness, the following mean rates of cure were found: ornidazole (RC = 97.6% ± 2.5), tinidazole (RC = 91.1% ± 6.3), metronidazole (RC = 81.5% ± 18.6), nitazoxanide (RC = 79.7% ± 1.8), and albendazole (RC = 73.4% ± 19.8) (). According to the nonrandomized clinical trials, metronidazole was the drug most frequently studied and tested on the RCTs. Likewise, this drug had greater efficacy with larger doses and with more prolonged regimes (5 to 10 days), reaching cure rates of 89% to 97% with these schemes ().

Table 11 Mean rate of cure of drugs in randomized control clinical trials

Table 12 More effective doses of drugs tested in randomized clinical trials

On the RCTs, tinidazole and ornidazole were the drugs which showed good efficacy using a single-dose scheme. Albendazole shown great variability in efficacy, not only in a single dose (RC = 50% to 97%), but also in prolonged regimes (RC = 62% to 90%).

The side effects were poorly described in the majority of studies in the nonrandomized control trials, and they ranged from none to 59%, although they were mild and transient. As in nonrandomized clinical trials, the prevalence of side effects were poorly described in the majority of RCTs studies, ranging from few or absent to 70%, and were also mild and transient.

Discussion

In 1957, the Rhone-Poulenc laboratories synthesized 1-(β-hydroxyethyl)-2-methyl-5-nitroimidazole (metronidazole) by manipulating the chemical structure of 2-nitroimidazoleCitation126 and this proved to be a highly effective agent against Trichomonas vaginalis infections.Citation127 In 1962, Darbon and colleaguesCitation128 reported that this could also be used in treatments against giardiasis. Thus, since it was discovered, metronidazole and other 5-nitroimidazoles – such as secnidazole, ornidazole, and tinidazole – are used by physicians to treat G. lamblia infections in addition to infections by other microorganisms. Nowadays, metronidazole is the most used drug to treat giardiasis worldwide; including in the USA.Citation129 However, the number of new drugs is increasing.

Doing this review, we found out that there were a high number of studies regarding the giardiasis treatment, even with the methodology used in the present study. However, the quality of them was very poor, mainly regarding their primary goal, their design, and sample size; in addition to a great heterogeneity detected between studies.

In all categories of studies, 298 were initially included (in vitro, in vivo, nonrandomized clinical trials, and RCTs), which, after selection, comprised 105 studies – representing 35.2% – that constituted the sample for the analysis. It is important to point out that we used relatively liberal criteria to select the articles, and the search was done only in the most important databases, comprising journals with more restricted and rigorous publication criteria.

One hundred and sixteen references to in vitro studies were found, which comprised 39 (33.6%) studies that constituted the data bank for analysis. Based on this, 50 drugs were evaluated, 48 (96%) of which showing activity against Giardia. Most of these studies had design to compare drugs among themselves (53 %): 52.4% to compare two drugs, and 47.6% to compare three or more drugs.

Many of the studies with two or more drugs did not necessarily compare the efficacy between drugs, but just analyzed and described the activity of the drugs without comparing their efficacy.

Although the number of known drugs tested was larger, we found out that the most widely tested drugs were metronidazole, albendazole, and furazolidone, and that the new drugs were larger in number, each with few studies (). In this context, several in vitro studies have been carried out in order to search for new substances with antigiardial activity. This way, many methods have been described aiming at determining the antigiardial activity of drugs in vitro.Citation4,Citation19,Citation64,Citation130Citation133 However, some of these are laborious and require long and hard work; furthermore, they are very difficult to reproduce for they lack standardization.

In the initial search for new drugs with antigiardial activity, 48 in vivo studies were found but only nine (18.8%) constituted the data bank for analysis, according to the inclusion criteria. Ten drugs were tested in these studies, and eight (80%) were active against Giardia. The majority of studies did not compare drugs, but just tested the activity of one drug against Giardia ( and ).

Table 6 In vivo studies: drugs more frequently tested

Again, the various models used and the absence of standardized design, besides the heterogeneity of these studies, make the comparative analysis difficult. In this context, several in vivo experimental models have been proposed. They are often beavers, young and adult rats,Citation134Citation137 rabbits,Citation138 dogs,Citation139 cats,Citation140 mice,Citation141,Citation142 and gerbils.Citation143,Citation144 However, the best results have only been obtained in gerbil experimental models. Gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus) is considered by several researchers the most appropriate experimental model for giardiasis due to its size, facility to handle, high susceptibility to infections, and large shedding of cysts in their feces.Citation143Citation148 Thus, we consider that the absence of standardized methods between studies limited the comparative analysis.

When we analyze the studies in human beings (nonrandomized trials and randomized control trials), we find great heterogeneity among them, besides the poor quality of their methodology.

No references selected were similar in design, dosages, duration of treatment, and results, which led to a great difficulty in grouping them according to the tested drug (required time or percentage of fecal cure, independent of duration of treatment). These findings agree with those by Zaat and colleagues.Citation149

In the nonrandomized clinical trials, slightly more than a quarter of studies compared the efficacy between drugs, whereas 47.8% tested drugs without comparing them to a placebo or to another drug, just appraising their efficacy in treated patients versus untreated patients. Only 13% compared a drug to a placebo.

On the RCTs, we find that two thirds of the studies (67.6%) compared the efficacy between drugs; however, only 14.7% compared drugs to a placebo. Here, just one study did not include a comparison between drugs. About half the nonrandomized clinical trials tested different dosages of drugs (assessment of therapeutic schemes), whereas the RCTs were comparative studies of efficacy between drugs, with few studies using a placebo for comparing the efficacy of drugs (14.7%).

Regarding the number of drugs tested, we built an extensive list of them: 55 drugs in 39 in vitro studies, nine drugs in nine in vivo studies, 12 drugs in 23 nonrandomized trials, and 18 drugs in 50 RCTs ().

Regarding the sample size, in human studies, we found a comparatively small sample size in both nonrandomized and RCTs studies. We found a higher sample size in the RCTs as compared to the nonrandomized studies, though not statistically significant (98.9 × 83.3 patients/study; p < 0.05).

These findings show a great number of studies in which the external validation, and, consequently, the generalizability of the results is jeopardized. Numerous confounding factors make the analysis of these studies difficult, mainly due to problems in controlling some variables in the population studied.

The most frequently tested drugs in the present review are listed in , , , and . We find that the most used drugs in human studies were all tested in in vitro studies, but not all drugs tested in in vivo studies were tested in human studies, although the number of drugs in the in vivo studies was as low as 10 drugs. Metronidazole was the most frequently tested drug. They were tested in 16.4% of in vitro studies, in 11.1% of in vivo studies, in 39.1% of nonrandomized studies, and in 61.8% of RCTs. Thus, this drug was the main drug in the available arsenal for giardiasis treatment, constituting a reference in relation to other drugs. This finding corroborates other reviews.Citation149,Citation150

When only the nonrandomized and RCTs studies were analyzed, the two most tested drugs were metronidazole and tinidazole. However, mebendazole and albendazole were among the most tested in RCTs, and they were barely tested in nonrandomized studies.

We also noticed that the “new drugs” for giardiasis treatment were barely tested in all categories of studies reviewed in this work, either in in vitro studies or in RCTs. This demonstrates the difficulty in adequately testing one drug for giardiasis in order to have alternatives in case of resistance to one of the therapeutic schemes.

In spite of the large amount of drugs used in antigiardial therapy, some resistance has been reported regarding different therapeutic regimens, and this resistance has been mentioned by clinicians.Citation18,Citation20,Citation151 This characteristic makes Giardia a fearful microorganism, mainly among undernourished people, in whom the malabsorption syndrome is more common. In this scenario, developing and screening new antigiardial drugs seems to be a priority.

In order to analyze the optimal dosages for the most tested drugs, we evaluated the mean rate of cure for all ( and ). We found out that the most tested drugs and those with more efficacy in studies with human beings were tinidazole and metronidazole; though ornidazole had a great efficacy not only in nonrandomized but also in RCTs. However, ornidazole was tested in only six studies in the present review (three nonrandomized and three RCTs).

The optimal dosages found in this review for most drugs were those that achieved the best rate of cure for each drug separately. , , , and show the most widely used drugs and their mean rate of cure, along with the optimal dosages for each. Comparing the mean rate of cure between the most tested drugs, we detected a similar efficacy among them, none being better than the others, except for mebendazole in the RCTs.

The analyses of the side effects have been poorly appraised and documented in most studies. Apparently, they have been similar in all studies, and no drug was reported to be unsafe, causing only mild to moderate and transient side effects.

However, regarding the new drugs, only those tested in human beings had their side effects described, but we have few data about it at the moment.

In summary, in this review we found many studies on the giardiasis treatment; however, most of them presented various problems concerning the sample size, methodology, design, among others.

Moreover, the number of drugs tested was large, with a relative higher number of new drugs listed, mainly in the in vitro studies, and a lower number in the studies with humans. However, these new drugs were barely tested as compared to the old drugs, mainly in humans, increasing the need for new studies to provide standardization for the evaluation of antigiardial drugs. This can provide more accuracy and quickness for approval, as well as an adequate use not only for the new drugs but also the old ones.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this review raises some problems regarding the evidence for using old and new antigiardial drugs, in relation to the quality of previous and future studies. Yet, one must point out that the drugs in use nowadays are the most widely tested and that they are safe, although we must rethink and further study the problem of their increasing resistance.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the financial support of FAPEMIG. The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

  • MeyerEARadulescuSGiardia and GiardiasisAdv Parasitol197917147395833
  • UngarBLPYolkenRHNashTEEnzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of Giardia lamblia in fecal specimensJ Infect Dis1984149190976363569
  • GoldinAJWernerAPTAguileraXEfficient diagnosis of giardiasis among nursery and primary school children in Santiago, Chile by capture ELISA for the detection of fecal Giardia antigensAm J Trop Med Hyg19904265385452372087
  • FarthingMJGHost parasite interactions in human GiardiasisQuart J Med1989702631912042690172
  • ThompsonRCAReynoldsonJAMendisAHWGiardia and GiardiasisAdv Parasitol199332711608237618
  • FayerRCryptosporidium: a water-borne zoonotic parasiteVet Parasitol20041261–2375615567578
  • ThompsonRCThe zoonotic significance and molecular epidemiology of Giardia and giardiasisVet Parasitol20041261–2153515567577
  • RendtorffRCThe experimental transmission of human intestinal protozoan parasites II. Giardia lamblia cysts given in capsulesAm J Hyg195459220922013138586
  • HunterPRThompsonRCThe zoonotic transmission of Giardia and CryptosporidiumInt J Parasitol20053511–121181119016159658
  • UngarBLPYolkenRHNashTEEnzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of Giardia lamblia in fecal specimensJ Infect Dis1984149190976363569
  • LaneSLloydDCurrent trends in research into the waterborne parasite GiardiaCrit Rev Microbiol200228212314712109771
  • World Health OrganizationThe World Health Report 1996 Fighting Disease Fostering DevelopmentGeneva, SwitzerlandWorld Health Organization1996
  • ThompsonRCALymberyAJMeloniBPGenetic variation in Giardia Kunstler, 1882: taxonomic and epidemiological significanceProtozool Abstracts199014128
  • WrightJMDunnLAUpcroftPEfficay of antigiardial drugsExpert Opin Drug Saf2003252954114585063
  • JohnsonPJMetronidazole and drug resistanceParasitol Today19939518318615463749
  • UpcroftJADunnLAWrightJM5-Nitroimidazole drugs effective against metronidazole-resistant Trichomonas vaginalis and Giardia duodenalisAntimicrob Agents Chemother200650134434716377707
  • LongKZRosadoJLMontoyaYEffect of vitamin A and zinc supplementation on gastrointestinal parasitic infections among Mexican childrenPediatrics20071204846855
  • EllisJEWingfieldJMColeDOxygen affinities of metronidazole-resistant and -sensitive stocks of Giardia intestinalisInt J Parasitol199323135398468134
  • UpcroftJACampbellRWBenakliKEfficacy of new 5-nitroimidazoles against metronidazole-susceptible and resistant Giardia, Trichomonas, and Entamoeba sppAntimicrob Agents Chemother199943173769869568
  • PetriWTherapy of intestinal protozoaTrends Parasitol2003191152352614580964
  • BorehamPFLPhillipsREShepherdRWAltered uptake of metronidazole in vitro by stocks of Giardia intestinalis with different drug sensitivitiesTrans R Soc Trop Med Hyg19888211041063176140
  • UpcroftJAUpcroftPBorehamPFLDrug resistance in Giardia intestinalisInt J Parasitol19902044894962210942
  • MelloniPMetelliRBassiniDFSnythesis and antiprotozoal activity of nitro derivatives of 2, 2’-biimidazoleArzneimittelforschung1975251914167793
  • GillinFDReinerDSWangCSHuman milk kills parasitic intestinal protozoaScience19832214617129012926310751
  • TakeuchiTKobayashiSTanabeMIn vitro inhibition of Giardia lamblia and Trichomonas vaginalis growth by bithionol, dichlorophene, and hexachloropheneAntimicrob Agents Chemother198527165703872626
  • WeinbachECCostaJLWiederSCAntidepressant drugs suppress growth of the human pathogenic protozoan Giardia lambliaRes Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol19854711451483983467
  • McIntyrePBorehamPFPhillipsREChemotherapy in giardiasis: clinical responses and in vitro drug sensitivity of human isolates in axenic cultureJ Pediatr19861086100510103519912
  • CrouchAASeowWKWhitmanLMSensitivity in vitro of Giardia intestinalis to dyadic combinations of azithromycin, doxycycline, mefloquine, tinidazole and furazolidoneTrans R Soc Trop Med Hyg19908422462482167523
  • MajewskaACKasprzakWDe JonckheereJFHeterogeneity in the sensitivity of stocks and clones of Giardia to metronidazole and ornidazoleTrans R Soc Trop Med Hyg199185167692068765
  • BorehamPFLUpcroftJAThe activity of azithromycin against stocks of Giardia intestinalis in vitro and in vivoTrans R Soc Trop Med Hyg19918556206211664150
  • BelosevicMFaubertGMDharampaulSAntimicrobial action of antibodies against Giardia muris trophozoitesClin Exp Immunol19949534854898137543
  • Ortega-BarriaEWardHDKeuschGTGrowth inhibition of the intestinal parasite Giardia lamblia by a dietary lectin is associated with arrest of the cell cycleJ Clin Invest1994946228322887989583
  • JohnsTFaubertGMKokwaroJOAnti-giardial activity of gastrointestinal remedies of the Luo of east AfricaJ Ethnopharmacol199546117237475119
  • FarbeyMDReynoldsonJAThompsonRCIn vitro drug susceptibility of 29 isolates of Giardia intestinalis from humans as assessed by anadhesion assayInt J Parasitol19952555935997635637
  • CampanatiLGadelhaAPMonteiro-LealLHElectron and video-light microscopy analysis of the in vitro effects of pyrantel pamoate on Giardia lambliaExp Parasitol200197191411207109
  • McAllisterTAAnnettCBCockwillCLStudies on the use of Yucca schidigera to control giardiasisVet Parasitol2001972859911358624
  • SousaMCPoiares-da-SilvaJThe cytotoxic effects of ciprofloxacin in Giardia lamblia trophozoitesToxicol In Vitro2001154–529730111566552
  • Cedillo-RiveraRChávezBGonzález-RoblesAIn vitro effect of nitazoxanide against Entamoeba histolytica, Giardia intestinalis and Trichomonas vaginalis trophozoitesJ Eukaryot Microbiol200249320120812120985
  • RoskensHErlandsenSLInhibition of in vitro attachment of Giardia trophozoites by mucinJ Parasitol200288586987312435122
  • MinenoTStanfordKMWalkerLASolution-phase parallel synthesis of an isoflavone library for the discovery of novel antigiardial agentsComb Chem High Throughput Screen20025648148712470277
  • Jiménez-CardosoEFlores-LunaAAngelesEIn vitro antigiardial activity of IRE-6A and IRE-7B, two ethyl-phenylcarbamate derivativesRev Invest Clin200355444444714635610
  • SuhMBelosevicMClandininMTDietary lipids containing gangliosides reduce Giardia muris infection in vivo and survival of Giardia lamblia trophozoites in vitroParasitology2004128Pt 659560215206461
  • Jiménez-CardosoEFlores-LunaAPérez-UrizarJIn vitro activity of two phenyl-carbamate derivatives, singly and in combination with albendazole against albendazole-resistant Giardia intestinalisActa Trop200492323724415533293
  • RayanPStenzelDMcDonnellPAThe effects of saturated fatty acids on Giardia duodenalis trophozoites in vitroParasitol Res200597319120015991042
  • Escudero-LourdesCMartínezFDMedina de la GarzaCEEffect of oral chronic intoxication with sodium arsenite on murine giardiasisProc West Pharmacol Soc200548929916416670
  • Navarrete-VázquezGRojano-Vilchis MdeMYépez-MuliaLSynthesis and antiprotozoal activity of some 2-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-benzimidazole bioisosteresEur J Med Chem200641113514116260067
  • MüllerJRühleGMüllerNIn vitro effects of thiazolides on Giardia lamblia WB clone C6 cultured axenically and in coculture with Caco2 cellsAntimicrob Agents Chemother200650116217016377682
  • ShinoharaLde FreitasSFda SilvaRJIn vitro effects of Crotalus durissus terrificus and Bothrops jararaca venoms on Giardia duodenalis trophozoitesParasitol Res200698433934416378220
  • FreitasSFShinoharaLSforcinJMIn vitro effects of propolis on Giardia duodenalis trophozoitesPhytomedicine200613317017516428024
  • Pérez-ArriagaLMendoza-MagañaMLCortés-ZárateRCytotoxic effect of curcumin on Giardia lamblia trophozoitesActa Trop200698215216116678115
  • BusattiHGNOVieiraAEDVianaJCEffect of metronidazole analogues on Giardia lamblia culturesParasitol Res2007102114514917906962
  • AnthonyJPFyfeLStewartDMcDougallGJSmithHVThe effect of blueberry extracts on Giardia duodenalis viability and spontaneous excystation of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts, in vitroMethods200742433934817560322
  • CalzadaFAlanísADAdditional antiprotozoal flavonol glycosides of the aerial parts of Helianthemum glomeratumPhytother Res2007211788017094176
  • CalzadaFYépez-MuliaLAguilarAIn vitro susceptibility of Entamoeba histolytica and Giardia lamblia to plants used in Mexican traditional medicine for the treatment of gastrointestinal disordersJ Ethnopharmacol2006108336737016846708
  • HausenMAFreitasJCJrMonteiro-LealLHThe effects of metronidazole and furazolidone during Giardia differentiation into cystsExp Parasitol2006113313514116473351
  • CalzadaFAdditional antiprotozoal constituents from Cuphea pinetorum, a plant used in Mayan traditional medicine to treat diarrhoeaPhytother Res200519872572716177979
  • Said FernándezSRamos GuerraMCMata CárdenasBDIn vitro antiprotozoal activity of the leaves of Artemisia ludovicianaFitoterapia200576546646815975735
  • AndrzejewskaMYepez-MuliaLTapiaASynthesis, and antiprotozoal and antibacterial activities of S-substituted 4,6-dibromo- and 4,6-dichloro-2-mercaptobenzimidazolesEur J Pharm Sci2004212–332332914757505
  • MeckesMCalzadaFTapia-ContrerasAAntiprotozoal properties of Helianthemum glomeratumPhytother Res199913210210510190180
  • LunZRBurriCMenzingerMAntiparasitic activity of diallyl trisulfide (Dasuansu) on human and animal pathogenic protozoa (Trypanosoma sp., Entamoeba histolytica and Giardia lamblia) in vitroAnn Soc Belg Med Trop199474151598024350
  • BorehamPFLPhillipsREShepherdRWThe sensitivity of Giardia intestinalis to drugs in vitroJ Antimicrob Chemother19841454494616511706
  • ReynoldsonJAThompsonRCMeloniBPIn vivo efficacy of albendazole against Giardia duodenalis in miceParasitol Res19917743253281866421
  • BhopaleKKPradhanKSPhaltankarPGActivity of a new oxadiazole compound, against experimental infections with Entamoeba histolytica and Giardia lamblia in animal modelsAnn Trop Med Parasitol19938721691788561524
  • WahlSMGilmanRHO’HareJHammondBRWallisPMA new miniculture technique for determining in vitro antimicrobial agent sensitivity of axenically cultivated strains of Giardia lambliaAdvances in Giardia ResearchCalgary, CanadaUniversity of Calgary Press19882124
  • NashTRiceWGEfficacies of zinc-finger-active drugs against Giardia lambliaAntimicrob Agents Chemother1998426148814929624499
  • VilleneuveVBeugnetFBourdoiseauGEfficacy of oxfendazole for the treatment of giardiosis in dogs. Experiments in dog breeding kennelsParasite20007322122611031759
  • HassanSINessimNGMahmoudSSEffect of a broad spectrum antiparasitic drug “ivermectin” in acute and chronic experimental giardiasis using different dose regimensJ Egypt Soc Parasitol200131241942811478442
  • LangfordTDHousleyMPBoesMCentral importance of immunoglobulin A in host defense against Giardia sppInfect Immun2002701111811748158
  • SteinJERadeckiSVLappinMREfficacy of Giardia vaccination in the treatment of giardiasis in catsJ Am Vet Med Assoc2003222111548155112784960
  • El-TaweelHAEl-ZawawyLASaidDEInfluence of the antioxidant drug (Antox) on experimental giardiasis and microsporidiosisJ Egypt Soc Parasitol200737118920417580577
  • ChoudhryVPSabirMBhideVNBerberine in giardiasisIndian Pediatr1972931431464555485
  • GupteSUse of berberine in treatment of giardiasisAm J Dis Child197512978661096596
  • LeviGCAvilaCANetoVAEfficay of various drugs for treatment of giardiasis. A comparative studyAm J Trop Med Hyg1977263564565869108
  • IyngkaranNLeeILRobinsonMJSingle dose treatment with Tiberal of Giardia lamblia infection in childrenScand J Infect Dis1978103243246362519
  • JokipiiLJokipiiAMComparison of four dosage schedules in the treatment of giardiasis with metronidazoleInfection1978629294649204
  • GazderAJBanerjeeMSingle dose therapy of giardiasis with tinidazole and metronidazoleDrugs197815 suppl 13032657994
  • FarahmandianISheibanFSanatiAEvaluation of the effect of a single dose of tinidazole (Fasigyn) in giardiasisJ Trop Med Hyg1978817139140359826
  • JokipiiAMJokipiiLComparative evaluation of two dosages of tinidazole in the treatment of giardiasisAm J Trop Med Hyg1978274758761686240
  • KavousiSGiardiasis in infancy and childhood: a prospective study of 160 cases with comparison of quinacrine (Atabrine) and metronidazole (Flagyl)Am J Trop Med Hyg19792811923434310
  • WerkmanHPMeuwissenJHSingle-dose treatment of giardiasis with ornidazole in childrenLancet197928156–8157137392716
  • SabchareonAChongsuphajaisiddhiTAttanathPTreatment of giardiasis in children with quinacrine, metronidazole, tinidazole and ornidazoleSoutheast Asian J Trop Med Public Health19801122802847434079
  • CraftJCMurphyTNelsonJDFurazolidone and quinacrine. Comparative study of therapy for giardiasis in childrenAm J Dis Child198113521641667468550
  • BassilySFaridZel-MasryNATreatment of intestinal E. histolytica and G. lamblia with metronidazole, tinidazole and ornidazole: a comparative studyJ Trop Med Hyg19879019123546716
  • CervettoJLRamonetMNahmodLHGiardiasis. Functional, immunological and histological study of the small bowel. Therapeutic trial with a single dose of tinidazoleArq Gastroenterol19872421021123333125
  • NikoliADurkovi -DakoviOPetroviZEffects of age-targeted treatment of intestinal parasite infections in SerbiaJ Chemother1995715557
  • QureshiHAliABaqaiREfficacy of a combined diloxanide furoate-metronidazole preparation in the treatment of amoebiasis and giardiasisJ Int Med Res19972531671709178149
  • AgarwalAKTripathiDMSahaiRManagement of giardiasis by a herbal drug ‘Pippali Rasayana’: a clinical studyJ Ethnopharmacol19975632332369201614
  • PenggabeanMNorhayatiOothumanPEfficacy of albendazole in the treatment of Trichuris trichuria and Giardia intestinalis infection in rural Malay communitiesMed J Malaysia199853440841210971985
  • QureshiHBaqaiRMehdiISecnidazole response in amoebiasis and giardiasisEast Mediterr Health J19995238939010793818
  • Di PriscoMCJiménezJCRodríguezNClinical trial with secnidazole in a single dose in Venezuelan children infected by Giardia intestinalisInvest Clin200041317918811029834
  • MonajemzadehSMMonajemzadehMComparison of iron and hematological indices in Giardia lamblia infection before and after treatment in 102 children in Ahwaz, IranMed Sci Monit20081411923
  • BassilySFaridZMikhailJWThe treatment of Giardia lamblia infection with mepacrine, metronidazole and furazolidoneJ Trop Med Hyg197073115185416200
  • GazderAJBanerjeeMSingle-dose treatment of giardiasis in children: a comparison of tinidazole and metronidazoleCurr Med Res Opin197752164168340134
  • KrishnamurthyKASaradhambalVSingle dose therapy of giardiasis: a comparative study of tinidazole and metronidazole in pediatric patientsIndian Pediatr19781515156669778
  • MasryNAFaridZMinerWFTreatment of giardiasis with tinidazoleAm J Trop Med Hyg1978271 Pt 1201202626273
  • KyrönseppäHPetterssonTTreatment of giardiasis: relative efficacy of metronidazole as compared with tinidazoleScand J Infect Dis19811343113127313587
  • SpeelmanPSingle-dose tinidazole for the treatment of giardiasisAntimicrob Agents Chemother19852722272293985604
  • OkhuysenPCDuPontHLFlores LopezJFA comparative study of furazolidone and placebo in addition to oral rehydration in the treatment of acute infantile diarrheaScand J Gastroenterol Suppl198916939462694341
  • Quiros-BuelnaEFurazolidone and metronidazole for treatment of giardiasis in childrenScand J Gastroenterol Suppl198916965692694346
  • GasconJMorenoAVallsMEFailure of mebendazole treatment in Giardia lamblia infectionTrans R Soc Trop Med Hyg19898356472694502
  • GasconJAbósRVallsMEMebendazole and metronidazole in giardial infectionsTrans R Soc Trop Med Hyg19908456942278074
  • OrenBSchgurenskyEEphrosMSingle-dose ornidazole versus seven-day metronidazole therapy of giardiasis in Kibbutzim children in IsraelEur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis199110119639651794369
  • al-WailiNSHasanNUMebendazole in giardial infection: a comparative study with metronidazoleJ Infect Dis19921656117011711583344
  • DuttaAKPhadkeMABagadeACA randomised multicentre study to compare the safety and efficacy of albendazole and metronidazole in the treatment of giardiasis in childrenIndian J Pediatr19946166896937721374
  • MisraPKKumarAAgarwalVA comparative clinical trial of albendazole versus metronidazole in giardiasisIndian Pediatr19953232912948613282
  • AndrewsBJPanitescuDJipaGHChemotherapy for giardiasis: randomized clinical trial of bacitracin, bacitracin zinc, and a combination of bacitracin zinc with neomycinAm J Trop Med Hyg19955243183217741168
  • MisraPKKumarAAgarwalVA comparative clinical trial of albendazole versus metronidazole in children with giardiasisIndian Pediatr19953277797828617554
  • BulutBUGülnarSBAysevDAlternative treatment protocols in giardiasis: a pilot studyScand J Infect Dis19962854934958953680
  • PengsaaKSirivichayakulCPojjaroenanantCAlbendazole treatment for Giardia intestinalis infections in school childrenSoutheast Asian J Trop Med Public Health1999301788310695793
  • SadjjadiSMAlborziAWMostovfiHComparative clinical trial of mebendazole and metronidazole in giardiasis of childrenJ Trop Pediatr200147317617811419683
  • RossignolJFAyoubAAyersMSTreatment of diarrhea caused by Giardia intestinalis and Entamoeba histolytica or E. dispar: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of nitazoxanideJ Infect Dis2001184338138411443569
  • OrtizJJAyoubAGargalaGRandomized clinical study of nitazoxanide compared to metronidazole in the treatment of symptomatic giardiasis in children from Northern PeruAliment Pharmacol Ther20011591409141511552913
  • GrantJMahantySKhadirAWheat germ supplement reduces cyst and trophozoite passage in people with giardiasisAm J Trop Med Hyg200165670571011791961
  • PengsaaKLimkittikulKPojjaroenanantCSingle-dose therapy for giardiasis in school-age childrenSoutheast Asian J Trop Med Public Health200233471171712757214
  • OzbilginAErtanPYereliKGiardiasis treatment in Turkish children with a single dose of ornidazoleScand J Infect Dis2002341291892012587625
  • EscobedoAACañeteRGonzalezMEA randomized trial comparing mebendazole and secnidazole for the treatment of giardiasisAnn Trop Med Parasitol200397549950412930613
  • EscobedoAANúñezFAMoreiraIComparison of chloroquine, albendazole and tinidazole in the treatment of children with giardiasisAnn Trop Med Parasitol200397436737112831522
  • KarabayOTamerAGunduzHAlbendazole versus metronidazole treatment of adult giardiasis: An open randomized clinical studyWorld J Gastroenterol20041081215121715069729
  • YereliKBalcio luICErtanPAlbendazole as an alternative therapeutic agent for childhood giardiasis in TurkeyClin Microbiol Infect200410652752915191380
  • BesirbelliogluBAUlcayACanMSaccharomyces boulardii and infection due to Giardia lambliaScand J Infect Dis200638 6–747948116798698
  • CaneteREscobedoAAGonzalezMERandomized clinical study of five days apostrophe therapy with mebendazole compared to quinacrine in the treatment of symptomatic giardiasis in childrenWorld J Gastroenterol200612396366637017072963
  • CañeteREscobedoAAGonzálezMEA randomized, controlled, open-label trial of a single day of mebendazole versus a single dose of tinidazole in the treatment of giardiasis in childrenCurr Med Res Opin200622112131213617076973
  • AlizadehARanjbarMKashaniKMAlbendazole versus metronidazole in the treatment of patients with giardiasis in the Islamic Republic of IranEast Mediterr Health J200612554855417333792
  • LindquistHDInduction of albendazole resistance in Giardia lambliaMicrob Drug Resist1996244334349158815
  • El-TaweelHAEl-ZawawyLASaidDEInfluence of the anti-oxidant drug (Antox) on experimental giardiasis and microsporidiosisJ Egypt Soc Parasitol200737118920417580577
  • MaedaKOsatoTUmezaHA new antibiotic: AzomycinJ Antibiot19536A18213152032
  • CosarCJulouLActivitc de 1`(hydroxy-2-ethyl)-1-methyl-2-nitro-5-imidazole (8,823 RP) vis-à-vis des infections experimentales Trichomonas vaginalisAnn Inst Pasteur19599623824113627590
  • DarbonAPortalAGirierLTreatment of giardiasis (lambliasis) with metronidazolePresse Med196270151613883519
  • GardnerTBHillDRTreatment of GiardiasisClin Microbiol Rev200114111412811148005
  • BorehamPFLPhillipsREShepherdRWThe sensitivity of Giardia intestinalis to drugs in vitroJ Antimicrob Chemother19841454494616511706
  • WrightCWMelwaniSIPhillipsonJDDetermination of anti-giardial activity in vitro by mean of soluble formazan productionTrans R Soc Trop Med Hyg19928655175191475820
  • KangEWClinchKFurneauxRHA novel and simple colorimetric method for screening Giardia intetinalis and anti-giardial activity in vitroParasitol1998117Pt 3229234
  • BusattiHGNOGomesMAA simple colourimetric method to determine anti-giardial activity of drugsParasitol Res2007101381982117387517
  • SehgalAKGrewalMSChakravartiRNExperimental giardiasis in albino ratsIndian J Med Res197664710151018992824
  • VinayakVKSharmaGLNaikSRExperimental Giardia lamblia infection in Swiss mice – a preliminary reportIndian J Med Res197970195198521089
  • CraftJCNelsonJDDiagnosis of giardiasis by counterimmunoeletrophoresis of fecesJ Infect Dis198214544995047069230
  • HillDRGuerrantRLPearsonRDGiardia lamblia infection of suckling miceJ Infect Dis198314722172216827138
  • SchleinitzPJustusPStenzelPA successful introduction of culture adapted Giardia intestinalis in rabbit model: ultrastructural featuresGastroenterology1983841301
  • HewlettELAndrewsJSRuffierJrExperimental infection of mongrel dogs with Giardia lamblia cysts and cultures trophozoitesJ Infect Dis1982145189937054320
  • KirkpatrickCEGrennGASusceptibility of domestic cats to infections with Giardia lamblia cysts and trophozoites from human sourcesJ Clin Microbiol19852156786803998096
  • BarbosaECalzadaFCamposRAntigiardial activity of methanolic extracts from Helianthemum glomeratumLag and Rubus coriifolius Focke in suckling mice CD-1J Ethnopharmacol2006108339539716824716
  • BarbosaECalzadaFCamposRIn vivo antigiardial activity of three flavonoids isolated of some medicinal plants used in Mexican traditional medicine for the treatment of diarrheaJ Ethnopharmacol2007109355255417052875
  • BelosevicMFaubertGMMacleanJDGiardia lamblia infections in Mongolian Gerbils: an animal modelJ Infect Dis198314722222266827139
  • AraújoNSMundimMJSGomesMAGiardia duodenalis: Pathological alterations in gerbils, Meriones unguiculatus, infected with different dosages of trophozoitesExp Parasitol2008118444945718083166
  • FaubertGMBelosevicMWalkerTSComparative studies on the pattern of infection with Giardia spp. In Mongolian gerbilsJ Parasitol19836958028056672162
  • VivesvaraGSSmithPDHealyGRAn immunofluorescence test to detect serum anibodies to Giardia lambliaAnn Intern Med1988936802805
  • BuretAGalliDGOlsonMEGrowth, activities of enzymes in the small intestines and ultrastructure of microvillous border in gerbils infected with Giardia duodenalisParasitol Res19917721091142027878
  • MohamedSRFaubertGMDissacharidase deficiencies in Mongolian gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus) protected against Giardia lambliaParasitol Res19958175825907479650
  • ZaatJOMankTHAssendelftWJWITHDRAWN: Drugs for treating giardiasisCochrane Database Syst Rev20072CD00021717636622
  • EscobedoAACimermanSGiardiasis: a pharmacotherapy reviewExpert Opin Pharmacother20078121885190217696791
  • UpcroftPUpcroftJADrug targets and mechanisms of resistance in the anaerobic protozoaClin Microbiol Rev200114115016411148007