30
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
BIRTH

High cesarean prevalence in a national population-based study in Brazil: the role of private practice

, , , &
Pages 903-908 | Received 16 Aug 2009, Accepted 02 Apr 2010, Published online: 29 Jun 2010
 

Abstract

Background. Excessive use of cesarean sections (CSs) is a serious problem worldwide. Objective. To estimate the frequency and identify factors associated with cesarean deliveries in Brazil. Design. Cross-sectional study conducted in 2006–2007 as part of the third edition of the Children's and Women's National Demographic and Health Survey. Setting. Brazil. Sample. Brazilian women in reproductive age. Methods. Socioeconomic and demographic data were utilized, including maternal age, education level, per capita income, skin color, smoking habit, marital status, age at first delivery, parity, and type of prenatal services. Main outcome measures. Adjusted estimate of the prevalence ratios of the type of delivery performed (cesarean or vaginal). Results. Cesarean prevalence was 43.9% (95% CI: 40.9–46.9), 68.7% for women who had per capita income greater than US$ 125 per month, and 77.2% for those who had attended private or privately insured prenatal services. In the adjusted analysis, the variables that presented significant prevalence ratios (95% confidence interval) were macro-region [southeast = 1.45 (1.21–1.73); south = 1.48 (1.24–1.77), and midwest = 1.43 (1.21–1.71)], maternal age above 25 years [26–30 years = 1.57 (1.25–1.97); ≥ 31 years = 1.77 (1.39–2.27)], education levels ≥ 9 years (PR = 1.86, 95% CI: 1.55–2.23), and having attended private or privately insured prenatal services (PR = 1.87, 95% CI: 1.65–2.12) and parity [primipara = 1.87 (1.47–2.36)]. Conclusions. CS rates are generally very high in Brazil. They are significantly higher than the average among women attending private/insured antenatal care, among the highly educated, and in provinces with higher socioeconomic levels.

Acknowledgements

Gilberto Kac received productivity scholarship of the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq). Funding was received from the Brazilian Ministry of Health.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.