366
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ACTA REVIEW

Prevalence of postpartum urinary incontinence: a systematic review

&
Pages 1511-1522 | Received 28 Jun 2010, Accepted 05 Sep 2010, Published online: 05 Nov 2010
 

Abstract

Objective. To investigate the prevalence of urinary incontinence within the first year postpartum. Design. A systematic review of population-based studies. Population. General female populations up to 1 year postpartum. Methods. Studies on incontinence in population-based sample defined as from one or more district hospitals or from multiple clinics covering a defined geographic area. Studies of women from a single outpatient clinic or who were referred for care (e.g. for being high risk) were excluded. In addition, studies had to have a sample size of over 100 participants and a response rate 50% or over. Main outcome measures. Prevalence from individual studies as well as mean prevalence is given. Pooled prevalence is estimated for non-heterogenous studies. Results. During the first 3 months postpartum, the pooled prevalence of any postpartum incontinence was 33% (95% confidence interval (CI) 32–36%) in all women. The mean prevalence of weekly and daily incontinence was 12% (95% CI 11–13%) and 3% (95% CI 3–4%), respectively. The mean prevalence was double in the vaginal delivery group (31%, 95% CI 30–33%) compared to the cesarean section group (15%, 95% CI 11–18%). Longitudinal studies within the first year postpartum showed small changes in prevalence over time. Conclusions. The prevalence of postpartum incontinence was high. Prevalence was substantially less for more frequent incontinence. Urinary incontinence after cesarean section was half the prevalence after vaginal delivery.

Funding Support: David Thom was partly funded by the National Institutes of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Grant # R01- DK53335. Guri Rortveit was partly funded by the Norwegian Research Council during the work with this study. The researchers had full independence from funders in the current work.

No ethical approval was required for this kind of research.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.