179
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Thermo-mechanical degradation of composite restoration photoactivated by modulated methods—a SEM study of marginal and internal gap formation

, , , , &
Pages 1341-1347 | Received 04 Oct 2012, Accepted 14 Dec 2012, Published online: 28 Feb 2013
 

Abstract

Objective. To evaluate the influence of thermal-mechanical degradation on superficial and internal gap formation of composite restorations photoactivated using modulated methods. Materials and methods. An experimental composite was prepared using a resin matrix containing 65wt% Bis-GMA and 35wt% TEGDMA. Camphorquinone (0.5wt%) and dimethylaminoethyl-methacrylate (0.5wt%) were dissolved in the resin as a photo-initiator system and 65wt.% silanized glass fillers were added to the matrix. Ground buccal surfaces of bovine lower incisors were used to make 160 preparations (3 mm × 3 mm × 2 mm in depth). An adhesive system (Adper Single Bond 2) was applied and the specimens were assigned into 16 groups (n = 10), according to the photoactivation method [high intensity (HI), low intensity (LI), soft-start (SS) and pulse-delay (PD)] and the degradation protocol [(control/no degradation; thermal cycling (TC); mechanical loading (ML); thermo-mechanical loading (TC+ML)]. Marginal and internal interfaces of bonded restorations were replicated in epoxy resin and analyzed by SEM. Gaps were expressed as a percentage of the total length of the margins. Data were submitted to 2-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Results. For the control group no significance was noted among the photoactivation methods. TC had no effect in gap formation. ML and TC+ML increased the incidence of superficial gaps for both HI and SS groups as well as increased the internal gaps for all groups. Conclusion. Although photoactivation methods do not influence gap formation at first, composite restoration photoactivated by low intensity or modulated methods showed improved resistance to thermo-mechanical degradation. Mechanical loading is determinant for interfacial degradation of composite restorations, while thermal cycling has no effect on gap formation.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.