A comparison of three methods of using transtympanic electrocochleography for the diagnosis of Meniere's disease: Click summating potential measurements, tone burst summating potential amplitude measurements, and biasing of the summating potential using a low frequency tone

Abstract

Conclusion: Stimulus biasing modulated the amplitude of the tone burst evoked summating potential (SP) in ears affected by Meniere's disease less than in normal ears. A reduced SP bias ratio added diagnostic accuracy for the diagnosis of Meniere's disease. Objectives: To evaluate the effect of stimulus biasing on the human tone burst SP, and to determine if stimulus biasing could contribute to the electrocochleography as a means of confirming the diagnosis of Meniere's disease. Patients and methods: Patients referred for transtympanic electrocochleography (TT ECochG) were assessed prospectively on clinical grounds according to the AAO-HNS criteria and a scale devised by one of the authors. A Meniere's group of ears and a non-Meniere's group of ears was determined. The ears opposite a Meniere's ear were not included in the analysis. The ratio of the click SP amplitude and the action potential (AP) amplitude (SP/AP ratio), the tone burst SP amplitude at 500 Hz,1 kHz, 2kHz and 8 kHz, and the effect of stimulus biasing on the tone burst SP were measured. Results: A unipolar stimulus biasing ratio established for the modulation of the 1 kHz tone burst SP separated the Meniere's ears from the non-Meniere's ears with a sensitivity of 85% at a specificity of 80.6% and the difference between groups reached statistical significance (p=0.016). The 1 kHz SP amplitude measurements and the stimulus biasing measurements were superior to the click SP/AP ratio for identifying the Meniere's group. A combination of 1 kHz SP amplitude measurements and SP bias ratio separated the Meniere's ears from the non-Meniere's ears with an accuracy of 85%.

• Endolymphatic hydrops
• vertigo
• electrophysiology
• electrocochleography
• Meniere's disease