158
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
MOUTH/PHARYNX

Prognostic significance of the various classifications for parapharyngeal space involvement in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

, , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 1197-1207 | Received 01 Mar 2012, Accepted 29 Apr 2012, Published online: 12 Jun 2012
 

Abstract

Conclusion: Advanced parapharyngeal space (PPS) involvement showed stronger prognostic value than PPS involvement. The classification of PPS involvement proposed by Min or Sham was the most appropriate classification for parapharyngeal extension in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). The degree of tumor extension into the PPS should be considered in future TNM staging revisions. Objectives: This study was conducted to evaluate the prognostic significance of the various classifications for PPS involvement in patients with NPC. Methods: From January to July 2000, a total of 176 patients with pathologically diagnosed NPC were prospectively enrolled in this study. The extent of PPS involvement was examined by contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan and graded according to the four previously reported classifications (Min, Sham, Xiao, and Heng). Results: The incidence of PPS involvement was 81.8%. The 5-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and local relapse-free survival rates (LRFS) of the patients with and without PPS involvement were 68.1% and 90.2% (p = 0.010), 66.1% and 87.2% (p = 0.013), 76.7% and 93.6% (p = 0.032), and 84.9% and 93.1% (p = 0.220), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that PPS involvement (yes vs no) was not an independent prognostic factor. However, graded PPS involvement was an independent factor affecting the prognosis of NPC. When the four classifications were included in a Cox model, it was shown that PPS involvement based on Min's classification was an independent factor for OS (p = 0.001). PPS involvement based on Sham's classification was an independent factor for PFS (p = 0.010) and DMFS (p = 0.009).

Acknowledgments

Supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 81072226); 863 Project (no. 2006AA02A404); Sci-Tech Project Foundation of Guangdong province (no. 2011B080701034); Sci-Tech Project Foundation of Guangzhou city (no. 11A52060042); and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 226.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.