Prognostic predictors of sudden sensorineural hearing loss in defibrinogenation therapy

Abstract

Conclusions: Defibrinogenation therapy rather than corticosteroids therapy should be chosen for patients specifically with profound hearing loss and with initial high fibrinogen. Objectives: Corticosteroids therapy is the standard treatment for sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) and prognostic factors by this therapy were reported. Defibrinogenation therapy is one of the treatment options for SSNHL. Aims of this study were to identify prognostic factors and correlative markers with hearing improvement in treating SSNHL by defibrinogenation therapy. Methods: During the early phase of the study, consecutive 61 patients were treated by defibrinogenation therapy with batroxobin (50 units), whereas corticosteroids (500 mg/day of hydrocortisone tapered by 9 days) were used for consecutive 64 patients during the late phase. Blood data that could predict a complete recovery were identified. Coagulation/fibrinolysis markers correlated with hearing improvement by defibrinogenation therapy were investigated. Results: Although there were no overall differences in hearing improvement between the two therapies, recovery rate in profound hearing loss patients was better in defibrinogenation therapy. In patients who showed complete recovery, serum fibrinogen level before treatment was significantly higher in the defibrinogenation group than the corticosteroid group. Responses of several fibrinolysis markers to defibrinogenation therapy evaluated by post-/pre-values were negatively correlated with hearing improvement.

Keywords:

• Sudden sensorineural hearing loss
• defibrinogenation
• corticosteroids
• prognostic factor
• coagulation
• fibrinolysis

Acknowledgements

This study was presented at 50th Annual Spring Meeting of American Neurotological Society at Boston 2015.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.