![Sample our Health and Social Care journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5938/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Health-Social-Care.jpg"})
Abstract
The objective of this study was to determine the potential of the acoustic reflex threshold (ART) as a predictor of the uncomfortable level (ULL) and to identify related areas for investigations in the future. Eleven studies reporting data from 141 normally-hearing and 240 impaired hearing subjects have been reviewed, focusing on methods, test conditions and subjects. Results and conclusions are discussed and new calculations have been performed on the reported data. The median difference between ART and ULL across studies and frequencies was 5 dB both in normally-hearing and impaired subjects. Some authors argue, that although a close relationship of mean values of the two measurements may exist, prediction of the ULL based on ART measurement will be inaccurate because of high inter-subject variability. A statistically significant correlation exists between the mean HTL, the mean ART and the mean ULL in impaired hearing, while a relationship between the mean ART and the mean ULL does not exist in normal hearing.
Based on pooled data across frequencies from the reviewed studies the mean ULL = (0.64′mean ART+38) dB HL.
The discrepancies between the results found in the reviewed studies may be explained by different instructions and stimulus presentation orders when assessing the ULL, difficulty in assessing the sound pressure level in the ear canal, influence of varying background noise levels and different admission criteria. It is recommended that the relationship between different loudness levels and the ART be investigated in normally-hearing subjects and in subjects with different levels of impairment, using standardized instructions. To further provide uniformity of the test material groups should be selected according to history of middle ear diseases and the use of hearing aids.