16
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Immunology

False-positive intercellular cement substance antibodies due to group A/B red cell antibodies: frequency and approach

, &
Pages 574-577 | Received 13 Mar 2010, Accepted 31 May 2010, Published online: 20 Sep 2010
 

Abstract

Aim: Antibodies to the intercellular cement substance of skin (ICSA) are characteristic of pemphigus vulgaris, and are commonly detected by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF). However, false-positive staining may arise when blood group antibodies, directed against A and B red cell antigens, bind to epitopes of similar distribution in the substrate. We sought to determine the frequency of such false-positive ICSA staining and to establish optimal conditions for its elimination.

Methods: IIF was performed on 100 de-identified routine serum samples of known blood group (A, B or O), along with serum from four pemphigus patients. Blocking was performed on samples which displayed typical ICSA staining using either a mixture of soluble A and B antigens in solution (‘soluble A/B antigens’), or red blood cells from a group AB donor (‘AB-RBCs’).

Results: ICSA staining was detected in 12 of 100 (12%) routine samples at a titre of between 1:10 and 1:160, and was most frequent in (but not restricted to) samples of blood group O (10/54, 19%). Blocking with soluble A/B antigens eliminated staining in 10 of 12 (83%) samples, whilst blocking with AB-RBCs eliminated staining in 11 of 12 (92%); one sample failed to block using either method, suggesting true ICSA reactivity. Blocking had no effect on the positive pemphigus samples, the titres of which were significantly higher (1:160 to 1:640).

Conclusions: Staining of the intercellular cement substance arising from group A/B red cell antibodies is common, particularly but not exclusively in patients of blood group O, making blocking mandatory in the routine evaluation of samples with such staining, particularly in a hospital-based population. Blocking using either soluble A/B antigens or AB-RBCs appears to be of comparable efficacy, although the former method is more convenient for a diagnostic laboratory.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Pamela Hudson for her critical reading of the manuscript.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.