763
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Validating objectives and training in Canadian paediatrics residency training programmes

, &
Pages e131-e144 | Published online: 23 Feb 2011

Abstract

Background: Changing health care systems and learning environments with reduction in resident work hours raises the question: “Are we adequately training our paediatricians?”

Aims: (1) Identify clinical competencies to be acquired during paediatric residency training to enable graduates to practise as consultant paediatricians; (2) Identify gaps in preparedness during training and; (3) Review and validate competencies contained in the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC) objectives of training (OTR) for paediatrics.

Methods: A questionnaire with 19 classification domains containing 92 clinical competencies was administered to RCPSC certified paediatricians who completed residency training in Canada from June 2004 to June 2008. For each competency, paediatricians were asked to indicate the importance and their degree of preparedness upon entering practice. Gap scores (GSs) between importance and preparedness were calculated.

Results: Response rate was 43% (187/435); 91.3% (84/92) of competencies in the RCPSC OTR were identified as important. Paediatricians felt less than adequately prepared for 25% (23/92) of competencies; 40 competencies had GSs >10%.

Conclusions: The unique approach used in this study is useful in validating OTR as well as the preparation of residents in relation to OTR. The results indicate a potential need for additional training in specific competencies.

Introduction

The fundamental objective of graduate medical education is to provide physicians with the knowledge and skills required for their future practice, ideally through supervised guidance, graduated responsibility and exposure to a broad range of medical conditions (Lesky 2007). Paediatric residency training in Canada is of 4 years duration and is designed to prepare paediatric consultants. The first 3 years are “core”. Training during the fourth year is variable in order to meet career goals of trainees. Over the past decade, roles played by paediatricians have changed and include: generalists (community-based paediatricians, hospital-based general paediatricians and academic general paediatricians), and subspecialists (The Canadian Association of Paediatric Health Centres Citation2008; Bannister et al. Citation2009). Changes in delivery of health care have included an increase in the number of children being managed as outpatients with in-patient care directed mainly to management of complex quaternary-level problems. This makes it difficult to offer comprehensive residency education solely in tertiary care hospitals. New directives on resident safety and wellness have limited resident work hours to approximately 65 h per week with no more than 24 h of continuous call. Mandatory “academic half-days”, longitudinal clinic “call back half-days” and mandatory post-call regulations have an impact on the time available for residents to adequately achieve the educational objectives of training (OTR). Residents, therefore, often comment that they are comfortable caring for acutely ill children in an inpatient setting (Lieberman & Hilliard Citation2006), but express discomfort managing ambulatory general paediatric problems (Veale et al. Citation1999; Ward et al. Citation2004; Chamberlain et al. Citation2005; Kolarik et al. Citation2006; Korczak et al. 2006; Narayan et al. Citation2006; Grant et al. Citation2007). These changes have also led to a continuing debate among educators across Canada as to whether the current 4-year residency training programmes adequately prepare paediatricians for their future careers.

In Canada, a group of experts [Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC) Specialty Committee in Paediatrics] determine the OTR, (Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada 2008a) and the specialty training requirements (STR), (RCPSC Citation2008b) for paediatrics. This group of experts is largely composed of physicians in academic practice who may not be fully aware of the needs of paediatricians practicing under different circumstances. Rarely do we validate their judgements. Recent studies in Canada (Lieberman & Hilliard Citation2006) and the US (Carraccio et al. Citation2004; Lesky 2007) have reinforced the need for regular programme evaluations, more standardized mechanisms for monitoring the training–practice gaps and the need for sufficient specific training to enable paediatricians to competently investigate and manage a variety of conditions. Thus, there is a need for ongoing monitoring of competencies acquired during residency training and preparedness for practice. A competence-based approach offers all medical specialties the chance to build their education programmes, on a practice-related model designed to improve performance (Dunn et al. Citation1985). In Canada, this would contribute to the validation and revision of the RCPSC OTR and STR in paediatrics to reflect what key competencies should be acquired during residency training. As consultant paediatric practice changes and as further changes occur in the epidemiology of serious paediatric illness (chronic diseases now more likely to cause mortality and morbidity), the competencies required of paediatricians will also constantly evolve (Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Citation2007; Wise Citation2007). As the focus of training and competencies required for general paediatricians is different compared to paediatric subspecialists, this study focuses on preparation of general paediatricians for practice.

In this study, we hypothesized that graduates from June 2004 to June 2008 have attained competencies during their residency training in paediatrics in Canada that have enabled them to function as paediatric consultants. Our aims were to: (1) identify what core clinical competencies should be acquired during paediatric residency training to enable graduates to practice as consultant paediatricians during their first 5 years in Canada, (2) identify possible gaps in preparedness during training and (3) review and validate competencies contained in the RCPSC OTR for paediatrics.

Methods

Survey instrument

The survey instrument used was a questionnaire. It was developed using previous studies, information obtained from community consulting paediatricians (verbal personal communication), CAPHC (Canadian Association of Paediatric Health Centres) data and Calgary Health Region data [inpatients at Alberta Children's Hospital (tertiary level) and Peter Lougheed Centre (community hospital), and patients seen in the emergency department at Alberta Children's Hospital] on the top 50 most commonly encountered paediatric problems. The questionnaire used the RCPSC OTR for paediatrics to focus on core clinical competencies (diagnosis, management and performing tasks/procedures). Using a modified Delphi method, it was pilot-tested among a total of 10 community consulting and subspecialty paediatricians for face validity. Core clinical competencies and tasks required to practice as consultant paediatricians in Canada were identified and a final questionnaire was developed. It contained 92 questions on clinical competencies with responses linked to a 5-point Likert-scale, and demographic questions. The 92 questions were grouped into 19 classification domains (). The demographic questions included: year of completion of residency training, number of years in practice, type of work and gender. The survey was designed to be completed in 15 min.

Table 1.  The Purpose of this questionnaire is to determine your opinion about what clinical competencies should be acquired during paediatric residency training so that a graduating trainee can practice as a consultant paediatrician

Sampling and recruitment

The RCPSC maintains a database of all physicians who were certified as generalists in paediatrics. There were 435 paediatricians certified by the RCPSC between June 2004 and June 2008, who had completed 3 or 4 years of general paediatrics residency training in a Canadian paediatric residency training programme, and were working in Canada. All these paediatricians were invited to participate in the survey. They were graduates of the 16 Canadian paediatric residency training programmes. The questionnaire was translated into French for the graduates of the three Canadian francophone universities. The questionnaire was administered using a web-based survey format. The paediatricians were sent an electronic letter describing the importance of completing the questionnaire. If no initial response was received, reminders were sent 2 and 4 weeks after the initial request. Respondents were asked to rate the importance of each competency and how well prepared they were at the start of their consultant practice on a Likert-scale of 1 to 5. For completion of the survey, an early bird prize of $400, and a $250 prize for a later draw were given. This study was approved by the Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board of the University of Calgary. Informed consent was implied by respondent participation in the survey.

Statistical analyses

Web responses were directly entered into a secure database. The data was stripped of individual identifiers so that individual paediatricians were not identified. Data files were password protected.

Gap scores between how important a competency/task is and how well prepared the individual had been were calculated. Mean raw gap score = mean importance – mean preparedness. Mean gap score (%) = (mean raw gap score ÷5) × 100. Comparisons were made between the importance and the acquisition of the competencies using gap analysis. Two-tailed t-tests were performed to determine the significance between importance and acquisition of competencies. This methodology enables assessment of the competencies that are required to function as consultant paediatricians and how residency training has prepared paediatricians for practice by determining the training–practice gap scores.

For practical purposes, a gap score of >10% was judged to be a threshold for potential concern with regards to the need for additional training in the competency being assessed.

Results

The response rate for the survey was 43% (187/435). Of the 187 respondents, 14.4% graduated from francophone universities and 85.6% from all the other Canadian universities. A total of 174 respondents indicated their type of work: 54% (94/174) were general paediatricians (academic paediatricians 13.8%; community paediatricians 19.5% and hospital paediatricians 20.7%) and 46% were paediatric subspecialists; 64% of respondents were female.

The majority of the respondents were in their early years of practice. The numbers of years in practice following RCPSC certification were: 1 year: 79 (45.7%); 2 years: 40 (23.1%); 3 years: 29 (16.8%); 4 years: 22 (12.7%); 5 years: 3 (1.7%).

The overall mean scores for all competencies and tasks for all respondents were: importance 3.61; preparedness 3.29; gap score 6.40%; significance: p < 0.001. There were no significant gap score differences between graduates of francophone and all the other Canadian universities in the 19 classification domains.

As the focus of training and competencies required for general paediatricians is different compared to paediatric subspecialists, results from the general paediatrician responses (n = 94) only are presented in this article (Tables ).

Table 2.  Responses regarding importance and preparedness (based on 5-point Likert-scale) and gap scores

Table 3.  Gap scores for all 92 competencies surveyed

Table 4.  Competencies rated as very important to diagnose and manage (mean importance ≥4)

Table 5.  Competencies rated as less than adequately prepared for (mean preparedness score <3.00)

Table 6.  Competencies/performing tasks with gap scores >10% and p < 0.001

presents responses regarding importance and preparedness in the 19 classification domains. Nine of these domains had gap scores >10% indicating that there were specific competencies within these domains that would require ongoing review and consideration for additional training during residency training.

depicts gap scores for all 92 competencies surveyed. These gap scores are based on the responses of general paediatricians when asked to indicate the importance of each competency as well as their preparedness at the start of their practice. Paediatricians rated 84 (91.3%) competencies to be important for practice, and indicated that they felt adequately prepared for 69 (75%) of the competencies surveyed.

presents 28 competencies that were rated as very important to diagnose and manage. Paediatricians indicated that they were adequately prepared for 24 (85.7%) of these competencies and very well prepared for 9 (32.1%).

presents 23 competencies for which paediatricians indicated that they were less than adequately prepared.

presents competencies and tasks where the gap scores were >10%. A total of 40 competencies were identified with gap scores >10% suggesting a threshold for potential concern with regards to the need for additional training in these specific competencies. One factor to consider is the importance of the competency.

Four competencies with gap scores ≥30% were identified: (1) managing an efficient work place/office, (2) practising cost-effective health care, (3) learning disability and (4) behaviour and conduct disorders.

Discussion

Canadian general paediatricians identified the vast majority of competencies contained in the RCPSC OTR for paediatrics to be important. They also felt adequately prepared for the majority of competencies surveyed.

Domains where preparation rated as less than adequate

General paediatricians indicated that their preparation for practice was less than adequate in 3 of the 19 domains (mental health, development/behaviour and continuing care). For all competencies in mental health (anxiety disorders, phobias and obsessive compulsive disorders, depression; attempted suicide; psychosomatic conditions and violent behaviour), specific development/behaviour competencies (attention deficit disorders with or without hyperactivity; learning disability, communicating with school regarding learning problems; behaviour and conduct disorders; autism spectrum disorders and pervasive developmental disorders), and specific continuing care competencies (assisting patients/parents in dealing with and navigating the health care system; managing an efficient work place/office; practising cost-effective health care) the mean preparedness score for diagnosing and managing each of these conditions/tasks was <3.00, indicating that preparation for practice was less than adequate irrespective of where they received exposure (in-patient or outpatient hospital; ambulatory or community setting) in order to attain the competency of diagnosing and managing the condition and/or task.

Competencies where preparation rated as well prepared

Competencies rated as very important and for which general paediatricians felt they were very well prepared included: asthma, bronchiolitis, croup, tracheo-bronchitis; pneumonia, common bacterial and viral infections; CNS infections; gastroenteritis, dehydration, prescribing and managing fluids and electrolytes; diagnosing and managing shock; common neonatal problems including respiratory disorders and hypoglycaemia. Recent graduates felt well prepared for competencies within the child/youth maltreatment domain that were previously identified as weaknesses (Ward et al. Citation2004).

Competencies rated as less important

Some competencies were felt to be less important, but preparation to diagnose and manage these conditions was adequate. These included: genetic counselling; work up of infant/child with suspected inborn error of metabolism; managing children/youth with neglect and/or abuse; providing care to disadvantaged children and advocating for their health care needs. These findings are congruent with changes that have occurred over the past decade in residency training that have improved residents’ self-reported preparation for assessing community needs (Cull et al. Citation2003; Kaczorowski et al. Citation2004) and participating in child advocacy efforts (Macnab et al. Citation1998; Flaherty et al. Citation2006).

Competencies rated as less than adequately prepared

Within the 19 domains, general paediatricians felt that they were less than adequately prepared for 23 specific core competencies including: 6 in mental health; 4 in development/behaviour; 3 in acute care; 3 in continuing care; 2 in surgery/trauma/MSK; 1 each in CNS; cardiovascular; ENT; renal/GU; and adolescent medicine.

These findings are similar to those of previous Canadian studies (Macnab et al. Citation1998; Veale et al. Citation1999; Lieberman & Hilliard Citation2006; Grant et al. Citation2007; Korczak et al. Citation2009) and multiple other US studies (Camp et al. Citation1997; Roberts et al. Citation1997; Mulvey et al. Citation2000; Blumenthal et al. Citation2001; Blendon et al. Citation2002; Garfunkel et al. Citation2005; Freed et al. Citation2009a, Citation2009b, Citation2009c, Citation2009d; Leslie Citation2009). Lieberman and Hilliard (Citation2006) found that paediatricians certified in Canada between 1999 and 2003 had received excellent training in most paediatric subspecialties and felt adequately prepared for their careers. However, paediatricians had identified gynaecology, child mental health/psychiatry, surgical subspecialties, behaviour and developmental paediatrics, adolescent medicine, and palliative care as areas of weakness in training.

Training needs

The high numbers of competencies with gap scores >10% among paediatricians suggests a need for additional training in selected areas. We recognize that the competencies required of paediatricians are constantly evolving and may be different for different types of paediatricians. This observation is in keeping with the Residency Review and Redesign project (R3P) participants conclusions in the US that residency training should be tailored to meet the diverse career needs of individuals who choose to care for disparate patients, in diverse settings, with a variety of health-related needs (Jones et al. Citation2009; Leslie Citation2009). Residency training programmes should allow flexibility and take a patient-based and family-centred perspective, tailoring training to the diverse and emerging health care needs of the paediatric population (Jones et al. Citation2009; Leslie Citation2009). Forrest et al.'s (Citation1999) survey of the referral practices of general paediatricians to specialists suggested that educators should ensure that the 50 most commonly referred conditions (which were similar to the competencies surveyed in this study) are emphasized during paediatric residency training.

As it is unrealistic to expect general paediatric residency training programmes to provide all learning that every paediatrician might conceivably need, residency training programmes will need to determine what expectations are reasonable. It will be important to ensure that making improvements in one area does not occur at the expense of training in other areas (ACGME Citation2007).

Limitations of study

The overall response rate for this survey was 43% which may limit the generalizability of the results to the population of general paediatricians. However, the results are based on the responses of 94 general paediatricians (response rate of 54% within the overall sample) with respectable representation from the academic, community and hospital domains as well as gender representation similar to the population of practicing paediatricians in Canada (Canadian Medical Education Statistics Citation2009).

This study is based on self-reported perceptions which can introduce an element of bias as well as general inaccuracy resulting from limitations in memory recall. There is mitigation in the memory recall effect as 69% of the respondents were in their first or second year of practice. Recent graduates are more likely to accurately remember what happened during residency training.

Of course the ideal study to determine the importance of competencies and preparedness in relation to these competencies would require the keeping of a log and in-practice assessment. Implementing such studies is extremely difficult and a literature review did not identify such studies.

This is the first time that these scales for importance and preparedness have been used. The scales were designed to be parallel. However, there may be some systematic bias in the scaling. This could somewhat skew the gap analysis. However, the relative measures and gaps should be consistent and meaningful.

This study deals only with general paediatricians. Programme needs are complex and before determining changes to be made to programmes, a full analysis of the needs of subspecialists would be necessary.

Conclusions

Canadian general paediatricians identified the vast majority of competencies contained in the RCPSC OTR for paediatrics to be important and they also felt adequately prepared for the majority of the competencies that were surveyed. These findings are similar to those of previous studies conducted both in Canada and the United States. The number of competencies with preparation less than adequate, and gap scores >10% suggest a need for additional training in selected areas during residency training, whereas the competencies rated as not important will require ongoing review by training programmes. Given that healthcare is changing rapidly, the competencies required of paediatricians will also constantly evolve and will be different for different types of paediatricians. The needs of general paediatricians and those of paediatric subspecialists should therefore be constantly monitored.

The methodology used in this study differed from others in that it linked specifically to OTR rather than only asking questions about domains. It is also unique in measuring not only preparedness but also the importance for practice of competencies, as well as the gap between importance and preparedness. This approach is therefore very useful in validating the objectives themselves as well as the preparation of residents in relation to these objectives. This methodology could prove to be useful across medical specialties as an on-going process to review and validate their OTRs, and to better define the competencies required for consultant practice.

Definitions

  • Competency: “a complex set of behaviours built on the components of knowledge, skills and attitudes”14

  • Competence: “one's ability to perform a task”14

  • Core years: In the Canadian context, the term “core years” refers to the first 3 years of paediatric residency training during which a resident is expected to gain adequate experience in both in-hospital and ambulatory facilities of a children's hospital or of the paediatric department of a general hospital. In addition, appropriate experience in community-based child health services and training in the comprehensive care of children with physical and psychosocial challenges must be obtained. During this period, a resident is also expected to learn the skills to work collaboratively with other medical and health disciplines dealing with infants and children, and acquire the professional attitudes to work with other health disciplines in a variety of health care service models.

  • Core competencies: In the Canadian context, the term “core competencies” refers to the competencies required to practice as consultant paediatricians in Canada.

Acknowledgement

This study was funded by The Alberta Children's Hospital Foundation.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the article.

References

  • Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. 2007. Program requirements for residency education in pediatrics [Published 2010 June 25]. Available from: www.acgme.org/acWebsite/downloads/RRC_progReq/320pediatrics07012007.pdf
  • Bannister SL, Amin H, Baird B. Paediatric medical education: Challenges and new developments. Paediatr Child Health 2009; 14(5)303–309
  • Blendon RJ, DesRoches CM, Brodie M, Benson JM, Rosen AB, Schneider E, Altman DE, Zapert K, Herrmann MJ, Steffenson AE. Views of practicing physicians and the public on medical errors. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 1933–1940
  • Blumenthal D, Gokhale M, Campbell EG, Weissman JS. Preparedness for clinical practice: Reports of graduating residents at academic health centers. JAMA 2001; 286: 1027–1034
  • Camp BW, Gitterman B, Headley R, Ball V. Pediatric residency as preparation for primary care practice. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1997; 151: 78–83
  • Canadian Medical Education Statistics. 2009. Post-MD trainees in Canada by field of training: % women. 1999/2000 – 2008/09, 31, pp 75
  • Carraccio C, Englander R, Wolfsthal S, Martin C, Ferentz K. Educating the pediatrician of the 21st century: Defining and implementing a competency-based system. Pediatrics 2004; 113: 252–258
  • Chamberlain LJ, Sanders LM, Takayama JI. Child advocacy training: Curriculum outcomes and resident satisfaction. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2005; 159: 842–847
  • Cull WL, Yudkowsky BK, Shipman SA, Pan RJ. Pediatric training and job market trends: Results from the American Academy of Pediatrics third-year resident survey, 1997-2002. Pediatrics 2003; 112: 787–792
  • Dunn WR, Hamilton DD, Harden RM. Techniques of identifying competencies needed for doctors. Med Teach 1985; 7(1)15–25
  • Flaherty EG, Sege R, Price LL, Christoffel KK, Norton DP, O’Connor KG. Pediatrician characteristics associated with child abuse identification and reporting: Results from a national survey of Pediatricians. Child Maltreat 2006; 1194: 361–369
  • Forrest CB, Glade GB, Baker AE, Bocian AB, Kang M, Starfield B. The pediatric primary-specialty care interface: How pediatricians refer children and adolescents to specialty care. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1999; 153(7): 705–714
  • Freed GL, Dunham KM, Jones MD, Jr, McGuinness GA, Althouse L, Research Advisory Committee of the American Board of Pediatrics. General pediatrics resident perspectives on training decisions and career choice. Pediatrics 2009a; 123(suppl 1)S26–S30
  • Freed GL, Dunham KM, Switalski KE, Jones MD, Jr, McGuinness GA. Recently trained general pediatricians: Perspectives on residency training and scope of practice. Pediatrics 2009b; 123(suppl 1)S38–S43
  • Freed GL, Dunham KM, Switalski KE, Jones DM, Jr, McGuiness GA, Research Advisory Committee of the American Board of Pediatrics. Recently trained pediatric subspecialists: Perspectives on training and scope of practice. Pediatrics 2009c; 123: S44–S49
  • Freed GL, Dunham KM, Switalski KE, Jones DM, Jr, McGuiness GA, Research Advisory Committee of the American Board of Pediatrics. Pediatric fellows: Perspectives on training and future scope of practice. Pediatrics 2009d; 123(suppl 1)S31–S37
  • Garfunkel LC, Sidelinger DE, Rezet B, Blaschke GS, Risko W. Achieving consensus on competency in community pediatrics. Pediatrics 2005; 115: 1167–1171
  • Grant E, Macnab A, Wambera K. The effectiveness of pediatric residency education in preparing graduates to manage neurological and neurobehavioral issues in practice. Acad Med 2007; 82: 304–309
  • Jones MD, Jr, McGuinness GA, First LR, Leslie LK, Residency Review and Redesign Pediatrics Committee. Linking process to outcome: Are we training pediatricians to meet evolving health care needs?. Pediatrics 2009; 123 (suppl 1)S1–S7
  • Kaczorowski J, Aligne CA, Halterman JS, Allan MJ, Aten MJ, Shipley LJ. A block rotation in community health and child advocacy: Improved competency of pediatric residency graduates. Ambul Pediatr 2004; 4: 283–288
  • Kolarik RC, Walker G, Arnold RM. Pediatric resident education in palliative care: A needs assessment. Pediatrics 2006; 117: 1949–1954
  • Korczak DJ, MacArthur C, Katzman DK. Canadian pediatric residents’ experience and level of comfort with adolescent gynecological health care. J Adolesc Health 2009; 38: 57–59
  • Lesky LG. The ever-widening training-practice gap. Acad Med 2007; 82: 219–221
  • Leslie LK. What can data tell us about the quality and relevance of current pediatric residency education?. Pediatrics 2009; 123: S50–S55
  • Lieberman L, Hilliard RI. How well do paediatric residency programmes prepare residents for clinical practice and their future careers?. Med Educ 2006; 40: 539–546
  • Macnab A, Martin J, Duffy D, Murray G. Measurement of how well a paediatric training programme prepares graduates for their chosen career paths. Med Educ 1998; 32: 362–366
  • Mulvey HJ, Ogle-Jewett EAB, Cheng TL, Johnson RL. Pediatric residency education. Pediatrics 2000; 106: 323–329
  • Narayan AP, Socolar RRS, St Claire K. Pediatric residency training in child abuse and neglect in the United States. Pediatrics 2006; 117: 2215–2221
  • Roberts KB, Starr S, DeWitt TG. The University of Massachusetts Medical Center office-based continuity experience: Are we preparing pediatric residents for primary care practice?. Pediatrics 1997; 100(suppl E)2
  • The Canadian Association of Paediatric Health Centres. 2008. Proceedings and recommendations. Child health in the 21st century: The role of the paediatrician in an inter-professional environment. [Published 2010 June 25]. Available from: http://www.caphc.org/documents_news/child_health_21/proceedings_feb_2008.pdf
  • The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. 2008a. Objectives of training in pediatrics. [Published 2008]. Available from: http://rcpsc.medical.org
  • The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. 2008b. Specialty training requirements in pediatrics. [Published 2008]. Available from: http://rcpsc.medical.org
  • Veale PM, DesCoteaux JG, Clarke ME. Quality of residency training in developmental pediatrics: A survey of residents and pediatricians. Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can 1999; 32: 432–436
  • Ward MGK, Bennett S, Plint AC, King WJ, Jabbour M, Gaboury I. Child protection: A neglected area of pediatric residency training. Child Abuse Negl 2004; 28: 1113–1122
  • Wise P. The future pediatrician: The challenge of chronic illness. J Pediatr 2007; 151(suppl 5)S6–S10

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.