55
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Gynaecology

Anaesthesia for incontinence surgery: Spinal anaesthesia or sedation?

, &
Pages 605-608 | Published online: 11 Aug 2010
 

Abstract

This was a patient and assessor blinded randomised controlled trial to compare the patient and surgeon's satisfaction for retropubic tapes inserted under sedation vs spinal anaesthesia and also looking at the bladder sensation following insertion of the tape. A total of 38 patients completed the study (19 in each group). The differences in mean visual analogue scores were in favour of spinal anaesthesia. The surgeon's assessment of patient cooperation was 24.2, 95% CI 9.6–38.8 p = 0.002, while for pain, the difference in the mean scores was –21.6, 95% CI –36.6 to –6.5, p = 0.006. The difference in the mean scores for the feeling of being in control was 21.4, 95% CI 0.85 to 41.63, p = 0.004. The only significant difference in bladder sensation postoperatively was the strong desire to void at 1 hour. This study demonstrates that spinal anaesthesia has better patient and surgeon satisfaction, with a difference in bladder sensation at 1 hour postoperatively.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.