A prospective qualitative study on patients’ perceptions of endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery

Abstract

Background. Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery has been shown to be a safe and effective treatment option for patients with pituitary tumours, but no study has explored patients’ perceptions before and after this surgery. Objective. The authors in this study aim to explore patients’ perceptions on endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery. Methods. Using qualitative research methodology, two semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 participants who were adults aged > 18 undergoing endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for the resection of a pituitary tumour between December 2008 and June 2011. The interviews were audiotaped and transcribed. The resulting data was analyzed using a modified thematic analysis. Results. Seven overarching themes were identified: (1) Patients had a positive surgical experience; (2) patients were satisfied with the results of the procedure; (3) patients were initially surprised that neurosurgery could be performed endonasally; (4) patients expected a cure and to feel better after the surgery; (5) many patients feared that something might go wrong during the surgery; (6) patients were psychologically prepared for the surgery; (7) most patients reported receiving adequate pre-op and post-op information. Conclusions. This is the first qualitative study reporting on patients’ perceptions before and after an endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary surgery, which is increasingly used as a standard surgical approach for patients with pituitary tumours. Patients report a positive perception and general satisfaction with the endoscopic transsphenoidal surgical experience. However, there is still room for improvement in post-surgical care. Overall, patients’ perceptions can help improve the delivery of comprehensive care to future patients undergoing pituitary tumour surgery.

Keywords::

• endonasal
• endoscopic
• patient perception
• qualitative research
• transsphenoidal surgery

Declarations of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interests. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the article.