135
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Comparison of Superior Rectus and Peripheral Lamellar Corneal Traction Suture during Trabeculectomy

, , &
Pages 215-221 | Received 06 May 2014, Accepted 13 Jan 2015, Published online: 24 Mar 2015
 

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of two different traction suture (superior rectus traction suture and peripheral lamellar corneal traction suture) in patients undergoing trabeculectomy.

Methods: This retrospective trial compared outcomes of 385 eyes that underwent trabeculectomy with superior rectus traction suture (SRTS group; 206 eyes; 53.3%) and peripheral lamellar corneal traction suture (CTS group; 179 eyes; 46.7%). Qualified surgical success is defined as an intraocular pressure (IOP) between 6 and 21 mm Hg with or without topical anti-glaucoma medication.

Results: After a follow-up of 24 months, the difference of IOP was significant (p = 0.042). The mean number of anti-glaucoma medications was 3.5 ± 0.6 and 3.5 ± 0.5 preoperatively (p = 1.000), whereas 0.18 ± 0.32 and 0.10 ± 0.39 at 24 months (p = 0.028). The 24-month qualified surgical success rates were 88.3% and 94.4% for both groups (p = 0.035; log-rank test). The difference between the two groups in regard to maximal bleb area is statistically significant (p = 0.011), with CTS group exhibiting more diffuse bleb area. The difference between the two groups in regard to the vascularity at the central and peripheral part of bleb is statistically significant (p = 0.019; p = 0.023, respectively). Encysted blebs was seen in 27 (13.1%) eyes in SRTS group and in 12 (6.7%) eyes in CTS group (p = 0.041).

Conclusion: The use of superior rectus traction suture is significantly associated with a lower success rate than corneal traction suture, suggesting that surgeons should use a corneal fixation suture if at all possible.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

No financial support was received for this submission. The authors do not have any possible conflicts of interest. All the authors confirm that the manuscript, or parts of it, have not been and will not be submitted elsewhere for publication.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 555.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.