1,911
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Pancreatic cancer

Pattern of increasing HbA1c levels in patients with diabetes mellitus before clinical detection of pancreatic cancer – a population-based nationwide case-control study

, &
Pages 986-992 | Received 14 Nov 2014, Accepted 04 Jan 2015, Published online: 03 Mar 2015

Abstract

Background. Diabetes mellitus is a risk factor for pancreatic cancer. Impaired insulin resistance might precede the clinical detection of this cancer by several years.

Methods. This was a nested case-control population-based study assessing the pattern of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) change before clinical detection of pancreatic cancer in a population of individuals with diabetes mellitus. All patients registered in the Swedish National Diabetes Register with a prescription of an anti-diabetic drug between 2005 and 2011 were identified. For each case of pancreatic cancer, 10 controls were randomly selected, matched for age, sex, and factors related to diabetes mellitus. Multivariable conditional logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between HbA1c and pancreatic cancer.

Results. In total, 391 cases and 3910 matched controls were identified. The risk of pancreatic cancer was increased more than two-fold in individuals with the highest HbA1c quartile compared with the lowest (OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.40–2.75). The risk of pancreatic cancer remained elevated when comparing the highest HbA1c quartile measured within five years from the clinical detection of pancreatic cancer to the lowest HbA1c quartile (p-value for trend < 0.05). No association was found between HbA1c and pancreatic cancer if HbA1c was measured > 5 years before the clinical detection of pancreatic cancer.

Conclusions. The pattern of increasing HbA1c in patients with diabetes mellitus preceded the clinical detection of pancreatic cancer by up to five years. These findings indicate that there is a lead time of several years during which the development of pancreatic cancer might be detectable through screening in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Pancreatic cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death in developed countries [Citation1]. The cancer is often diagnosed at an advanced stage impeding surgery with curative intention [Citation2]. Even after surgery, the prognosis remains poor with a five-year survival rate of below 20% [Citation3].

Numerous studies have shown an association between Type 2 diabetes mellitus and pancreatic cancer [Citation4–8]. Increased levels of markers of diabetes mellitus have been reported to be associated with pancreatic cancer in individuals without diabetes mellitus [Citation9,Citation10]. However, to the authors’ knowledge the duration of impaired glycemic control before the clinical detection of pancreatic cancer in patients with diabetes mellitus has not been fully investigated. A complex metabolic interaction exists between the tumor and pancreatic tissue which results in insulin resistance [Citation11]. Insulin resistance and impaired glycemic control might precede the clinical detection of pancreatic cancer in patients with diabetes mellitus [Citation11]. To our knowledge one previous nested case-control study assessed changes in the pattern of fasting plasma glucose levels before clinical detection of pancreatic cancer [Citation12]. In that study the level of fasting plasma glucose in patients with diabetes mellitus was significantly higher in cases compared with controls one year before the clinical detection of pancreatic cancer, regardless of the duration of diabetes mellitus. However, fasting plasma glucose has several disadvantages, including diurnal and intra-individual variation [Citation13].

Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), the most common measure of glycemic control in patients with diabetes mellitus, reflects long-term glucose concentrations. The test is not affected by the timing of the measurement or intra-individual factors [Citation13]. We hypothesized that glycemic control, assessed as HbA1c, in patients with diabetes mellitus will start to deteriorate several years before the clinical detection of pancreatic cancer. Thus, a population-based nested case-control study, including patients with diabetes mellitus in Sweden, was performed to investigate the duration of impaired insulin resistance, assessed by HbA1c, before the clinical detection of pancreatic cancer.

Methods

Study design

This study was a population-based nested case- control study of all patients with diabetes mellitus in Sweden with a record in the Swedish National Diabetes Register (NDR) [Citation14] and who had a dispensed prescription of anti-diabetic drugs in the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register since July 1, 2005 [Citation15]. The Swedish Cancer Register was used to identify all incident cases of pancreatic cancer during the follow-up between 1 July 2005 and 31 December 2011. Controls were randomly selected from the source population. The main exposure was the first recorded measurement of HbA1c in the NDR since 1996. Information on potential confounders was available through linkage to other nationwide Swedish registers. Record linkage was made possible using the personal identity number that uniquely identifies each resident in Sweden [Citation16]. The study was approved by the Ethical Review Board in Stockholm.

Sources of data

The Swedish National Diabetes Register was established in 1996 as a quality assurance register and collects information on clinically relevant data on patient visits on at least a yearly basis [Citation14]. Informed consent has been provided by all registered patients. In 2012, the register covered almost 90% of all patients with diabetes mellitus in Sweden [Citation17].

The Swedish Prescribed Drug Register, established in 2005 and covering the entire Swedish population, includes information on all prescribed and dispended drugs since 1 July 2005 [Citation15]. Information on the dispensed drugs is according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system.

The Swedish Cancer Register has registered information on all incident cases of cancer in Sweden since 1958. Both clinicians and pathologists are required to report new cases of cancer to the register, resulting in an overall high completeness of 96% [Citation18]. All cancers are recorded according to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code.

The Swedish Patient Register was established in 1964 and since 1987 has national coverage on all inpatient care and since 2001 national coverage on all outpatient specialist visits in Sweden [Citation19]. Each record includes, among other data, information on discharge diagnosis and surgical procedures.

The Cause of Death Register has information since 1952 on all deceased Swedish residents and data on cause-specific death are 99.2% complete [Citation20].

The National Education Register, established in 1985 by Statistics Sweden, annually updates information on the highest level of formal education attained (ranging from elementary to postgraduate level) by each Swedish resident [Citation21].

The Register of the Total Population contains demographic information (e.g. age, sex and date of emigration) on all Swedish residents since 1968 [Citation22].

Exclusions

Individuals with missing information on the first recorded HbA1c in the NDR (n = 18 530), type of diabetes mellitus (n = 23 280), duration of diabetes mellitus (n = 35 248) and type of anti-diabetic treatment (n = 3086) were excluded from the source population. In addition, patients with secondary diabetes mellitus (n = 1515) and patients with a history of cancer diagnosis (excluding non-melanoma cancer of the skin) or cancer diagnosis (including neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas) apart from pancreatic cancer during the follow-up (n = 35 554) were also excluded. Such exclusions resulted in a source population of 243 221 patients with diabetes mellitus registered in the NDR.

Identification of cases and controls

Cases had an incident diagnosis of pancreatic cancer and the date of cancer diagnosis was later than the first record in the NDR. Controls were cancer-free individuals with diabetes mellitus who did not develop cancer (excluding non-melanoma cancer of the skin) during the study follow-up. Person-time was calculated for all individuals in the source population. Censoring was made at date of death or emigration, whichever occurred first. For each case, 10 controls were randomly sampled using density-based sampling [Citation23]. The probability of becoming a control was proportional to the time at risk during the study period. Controls were frequency matched for sex, age (categorized in quartiles: < 60, 60–66, 67–72, ≥ 73 years), duration of diabetes mellitus (categorized in quartiles: ≤ 1, 1–5, 6–11, > 11 years), type of diabetes mellitus (Types 1 and 2), and the year of the first record in the NDR [1996–2003 (quartiles 1 and 2), 2004–2006 (quartile 3), > 2006 (quartile 4)].

Exposure was considered in relation to an index date assigned to each case and control. For cases, the index date was set as the diagnosis date of pancreatic cancer. For controls, the index date was a randomly assigned date during the study period (2005–2011).

HbA1c

The main exposure was the first recorded measurement of HbA1c in the NDR. The first recorded measurement was used to minimize potential bias introduced by multiple measurements. The HbA1c analyses were quality assured nationwide by regular calibration with the HPLC Mono-S method. The HbA1c values were converted to the IFCC standard using the formula: HbA1c (IFCC) = 10.11×(Mono-S)–8.94, and to DCCT by using the formula: HbA1c (DCCT) = 0.9236 × HbA1c (Mono-S)+ 1.345; R2 = 0.998 [Citation24]. The HbA1c levels were categorized in quartiles based on the measured levels in the control population [quartile 1: 27–45 mmol/mol (IFCC), 4.6–6.3% (DCCT); quartile 2: 46–51 mmol/mol (IFCC), 4.6–6.8% (DCCT); quartile 3: 52–60 mmol/mol (IFCC), 6.9–7.6% (DCCT); and quartile 4: 61–145 mmol/mol (IFCC), 7.7–15.4% (DCCT)].

Pancreatic cancer

Using the Swedish Cancer Register, patients with a histologically verified diagnosis of pancreatic cancer (ICD-10 code C250, C251, C252, C257, C258, and C259) were identified. No patient with endocrine pancreatic cancer was included.

Confounders

Educational level (categorized as < 9 years, 9 years, 10–12 years, > 12 years, unknown or missing) was used to estimate socioeconomic position. The Swedish Patient Register was used to identify patients with complicated diabetes mellitus, including a history of myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke or peripheral vascular disease, renal insufficiency, polyneuropathy or retinopathy before the first record in the NDR. In addition, patients with macro-albuminuria or polyneuropathy in the first NDR record were classified as having complicated diabetes mellitus. Information on smoking and body mass index (BMI) was retrieved from the NDR. BMI was measured using the formula weight (kg)/height2 (cm). BMI was categorized into normal weight (18.5–24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25–29.9 kg/m2) and obese (≥ 30 kg/m2). Furthermore, previous hospitalization for alcohol abuse (excessive alcohol consumption or alcohol-related disease) and pancreatitis were also identified using the Swedish Patient Register.

Statistical analyses

Conditional logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between the level of HbA1c and pancreatic cancer. Two statistical models were constructed: Model 1 was the crude model without any adjustment for confounders. Model 2 was adjusted for educational level, alcohol abuse, complicated diabetes mellitus, smoking and body mass index. No adjustment was applied for the type of anti-diabetic treatment because the choice of treatment is a consequence of glycemic control, which is the exposure in the current study.

The full model was irrespective of the latency between the first record in the NDR and the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. The potential interaction between the timing of HbA1c measurement with regard to clinical detection of pancreatic cancer (≤ 6 months, 6 months–1 year, > 1 year–2 years, > 2 years–5 years, > 5 years) was examined by testing the statistical significance of the interaction term with the Wald test. The statistical analyses were performed using Stata v.11.2 (StataCorp).

Results

There were 391 incident cases of pancreatic cancer between 1 July 2005 and 31 December 2011 and 3910 matched controls using density-based sampling. Frequency-matching resulted in a similar distribution of sex, age, duration of diabetes mellitus, type of diabetes mellitus and year of the first record in the NDR between cases and controls (). The median age was 67 years, 56% were men and the median duration of diabetes mellitus at the time of the first record in the NDR was three years. Distribution of education level was similar, except the controls were more likely to have unknown or missing information on education level. No statistically significant differences were observed in complicated diabetes mellitus, history of alcohol abuse or previous pancreatitis between cases and controls. However, smoking was more common in the cases (19%) than in the controls (12%). There were no substantial differences in the use of anti-diabetic treatment between cases and controls and both groups were more likely to use oral anti-diabetic treatment (46% of cases and 46% of controls).

Table I. Baseline characteristics of 391 pancreatic cancer patients with diabetes mellitus and 3910 matched controls.

The longitudinal changes in the level of HbA1c among cases and controls were graphically shown in relation to the timing of HbA1c measurement before the clinical detection of pancreatic cancer (). In cases, the HbA1c level increased 1–2 years prior to the clinical detection of pancreatic cancer and reached the highest levels 3–6 months before the diagnosis of cancer. This pattern was similar whether the first record of HbA1c in NDR was measured >5 years or ≤5 years before the clinical detection of pancreatic cancer. For controls the level of HbA1c was stable and showed little change irrespective of the timing of measurement Comparing the highest HbA1c quartile to the lowest in the crude model, the risk of pancreatic cancer increased by almost two-fold (OR 1.95; 95% CI 1.40–2.73) (). The corresponding association increased by 64% when comparing quartile 3 to the lowest quartile (OR 1.64; 95% CI 1.17–2.29). Adjustment for potential confounders changed the results only marginally. A statistically significant interaction was noted between the timing of the HbA1c measurement in the NDR and the clinical detection of pancreatic cancer (p-value for interaction < 0.01). In stratified analyses an increase in the risk of pancreatic cancer persisted when comparing the highest to the lowest quartile of HbA1c within the first five years from the clinical detection of pancreatic cancer (p-value for trend < 0.05). This association increased almost five-fold within six months from clinical detection of pancreatic cancer (OR 4.73; 95% CI 1.83–12.21) (). This association declined but was increased up to five years before the clinical detection of pancreatic cancer (OR 2.70; 95% CI 0.99–7.36 for HbA1c measured > 6 months–1 year before the clinical detection of pancreatic cancer; OR 2.51; 95% CI 1.17–5.40 for HbA1c measured > 1–2 years before the clinical detection of pancreatic cancer; and OR 1.77; 95% CI 0.99–5.40 for HbA1c measured > 2–5 years before the clinical detection of pancreatic cancer). No clear association was found between the timing of HbA1c when comparing the second and third quartile of HbA1c to the lowest quartile. HbA1c measured > 5 years before the clinical detection of pancreatic cancer was not associated with this cancer.

Figure 1. The level of HbA1c in relation to the clinical detection of pancreatic cancer among 391 cases and 3910 controls with diabetes.
Figure 1. The level of HbA1c in relation to the clinical detection of pancreatic cancer among 391 cases and 3910 controls with diabetes.

Table II. The risk of pancreatic cancer in relation to the quartiles of plasma HbA1c expressed as odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Table III. The risk of pancreatic cancer in relation to the quartiles of plasma HbA1c and time between time of measurement and diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. The estimates were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Discussion

In this population-based study on patients with diabetes mellitus the pattern of increased HbA1c levels was present up to five years before clinical detection of pancreatic cancer.

Strengths of this study include the nationwide population-based design, the prospective nature of the exposure data assessment and the complete follow-up of all patients using linkage to high-quality national registers on cancer, death and emigration. The information on the level of HbA1c was available for over 14 years, making it possible to assess the pattern of HbA1c change long before clinical detection of pancreatic cancer. There are some methodological considerations. It is reasonable to assume that patients with sub-clinical pancreatic cancer, with impaired cancer-related glycemic control, might undergo more frequent clinical examination and blood testing. However, in this study only the first measurement of HbA1c was included minimizing the role such bias on the observed associations. The first record in the NDR was not necessarily the time of the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Therefore, this study was not able to fully distinguish between new-onset and long-lasting diabetes mellitus. However, the median duration of diabetes mellitus was three years and the observed associations were present up to five years before the clinical detection of pancreatic cancer. There might be residual confounding by alcohol abuse, body mass index or smoking. However, such residual confounding would not explain the observed pattern of HbA1c change before clinical detection of pancreatic cancer.

Several studies have shown an association between Type 2 diabetes mellitus and pancreatic cancer [Citation4–8], and previous studies have investigated the role of markers for diabetes mellitus in a population without diabetes as risk factors for pancreatic cancer [Citation9,Citation10]. However, to the best of our knowledge the duration of impaired glycemic control before the clinical detection of pancreatic cancer in individuals with diagnosed diabetes mellitus has not been fully investigated. One nested case-control study assessed the pattern of fasting plasma glucose change and pancreatic cancer [Citation12]. In patients with new-onset diabetes mellitus, i.e. diabetes detected < 2 years before diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, the cases had statistically significantly higher median levels of fasting plasma glucose than the controls one year before the clinical detection of pancreatic cancer. The same finding was observed in patients with long-lasting diabetes mellitus. In the current study there was a pattern of increasing HbA1c levels observed as early as five years before the clinical detection of pancreatic cancer.

Several tumor-related mechanisms have been proposed to affect pancreatic function in pancreatic cancer patients [Citation11]. The tumor-related destruction of the pancreatic tissue could result in deteriorated pancreatic function. However, it is unlikely that the destruction of the pancreatic tissue could explain deteriorated levels of HbA1c several years before clinical detection of pancreatic cancer. Likewise, cancer-related cachexia is a late phenomenon. The complex metabolic interaction between pancreatic cancer and the pancreas resulting in insulin resistance might explain the early changes in the level of HbA1c many years before clinical detection of pancreatic cancer.

Pancreatic cancer is often diagnosed at a late stage without the possibility of curative surgery [Citation2]. In many patients tumor recurrence occurs after surgery resulting in poor survival rates [Citation3]. Therefore, the prerequisite for curability is the early detection of pancreatic cancer at a pre-invasive stage [Citation25]. Currently, no reliable or efficient biomarkers are available for early detection of pancreatic cancer [Citation26]. It seems that the transition from a resectable to an unresectable pancreatic cancer occurs approximately six months before clinical detection of pancreatic cancer [Citation25]. Our findings indicate a lead time of several years during which pancreatic cancer might be detectable through screening years before diagnosis. Thus, the long latency between the changes in HbA1c and the clinical detection of pancreatic cancer in patients with diabetes mellitus would provide a window of opportunity to identify patients with asymptomatic and potentially curable pancreatic cancer. Whether HbA1c or other biomarkers could be used for such screening remains to be clarified.

In conclusion, we observed that increased levels of HbA1c in patients with diabetes mellitus precede the clinical detection of pancreatic cancer by up to five years. Such a lead time would provide a unique opportunity to detect pre-clinical and potentially curable pancreatic cancer.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

This study was supported by the Swedish Cancer Society and Centre for Clinical Research, Sörmland County, Sweden.

References

  • Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011;61:69–90.
  • Baxter NN, Whitson BA, Tuttle TM. Trends in the treatment and outcome of pancreatic cancer in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol 2007;14:1320–6.
  • Wolfgang CL, Herman JM, Laheru DA, Klein AP, Erdek MA, Fishman EK, et al. Recent progress in pancreatic cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 2013;63:318–48.
  • Pannala R, Basu A, Petersen GM, Chari ST. New-onset diabetes: A potential clue to the early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Lancet Oncol 2009;10:88–95.
  • Elena JW, Steplowski E, Yu K, Hartge P, Tobias GS, Brotzman MJ, et al. Diabetes and risk of pancreatic cancer: A pooled analysis from the pancreatic cancer cohort consortium. Cancer Cause Control 2013;24:13–25.
  • Li D, Tang H, Hassan MM, Holly EA, Bracci PM, Silverman DT. Diabetes and risk of pancreatic cancer: A pooled analysis of three large case-control studies. Cancer Cause Control 2011;22:189–97.
  • Eijgenraam P, Heinen MM, Verhage BA, Keulemans YC, Schouten LJ, van den Brandt PA. Diabetes type II, other medical conditions and pancreatic cancer risk: A prospective study in The Netherlands. Br J Cancer 2013; 109:2924–32.
  • Liao KF, Lai SW, Li CI, Chen WC. Diabetes mellitus correlates with increased risk of pancreatic cancer: A population-based cohort study in Taiwan. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012;27:709–13.
  • Wolpin BM, Bao Y, Qian ZR, Wu C, Kraft P, Ogino S, et al. Hyperglycemia, insulin resistance, impaired pancreatic beta-cell function, and risk of pancreatic cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2013;105:1027–35.
  • Grote VA, Rohrmann S, Nieters A, Dossus L, Tjonneland A, Halkjaer J, et al. Diabetes mellitus, glycated haemoglobin and C-peptide levels in relation to pancreatic cancer risk: A study within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort. Diabetologia 2011; 54:3037–46.
  • Sah RP, Nagpal SJ, Mukhopadhyay D, Chari ST. New insights into pancreatic cancer-induced paraneoplastic diabetes. Nature Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013;10: 423–33.
  • Pannala R, Leibson CL, Rabe KG, Timmons LJ, Ransom J, de Andrade M, et al. Temporal association of changes in fasting blood glucose and body mass index with diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2009;104:2318–25.
  • Sacks DB. A1C versus glucose testing: A comparison. Diabetes Care 2011;34:518–23.
  • Gudbjornsdottir S, Cederholm J, Nilsson PM, Eliasson B, Steering Committee of the Swedish National Diabetes R. The National Diabetes Register in Sweden: An implementation of the St. Vincent Declaration for Quality Improvement in Diabetes Care. Diabetes Care 2003;26:1270–6.
  • Wettermark B, Hammar N, Fored CM, Leimanis A, Otterblad Olausson P, Bergman U, et al. The new Swedish Prescribed Drug Register – opportunities for pharmacoepidemiological research and experience from the first six months. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2007;16:726–35.
  • Ludvigsson JF, Otterblad-Olausson P, Pettersson BU, Ekbom A. The Swedish personal identity number: Possibilities and pitfalls in healthcare and medical research. Eur J Epidemiol 2009;24:659–67.
  • Nationella Diabetesregistret. [Årsrapport 2012 års resultat]. 2012.
  • Barlow L, Westergren K, Holmberg L, Talback M. The completeness of the Swedish Cancer Register: A sample survey for year 1998. Acta Oncol 2009;48:27–33.
  • The Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. [The Swedish Patient Register]. [cited 2012 Aug 6]. Available from: http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/register/halsodataregister/patientregistret.
  • The Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Swedish Causes of Death Register – Bortfall och kvalitet i dödsorsaksregistret. [cited 2012 Aug 6]. Available from: http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/register/dodsorsaksregistret/bortfallochkvalitet.
  • Statistics Sweden. The Swedish Register of Education. [cited 2012 Aug 6]. Available from: http://www.scb.se/Pages/SubjectArea_3930.aspx.
  • Statistics Sweden. [Register of Total Population]. [cited 2012 Aug 6]. Available from: http://www.scb.se/Pages/SubjectArea_1954.aspx.
  • Wang MH, Shugart YY, Cole SR, Platz EA. A simulation study of control sampling methods for nested case-control studies of genetic and molecular biomarkers and prostate cancer progression. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009;18:706–11.
  • Hoelzel W, Weykamp C, Jeppsson JO, Miedema K, Barr JR, Goodall I, et al. IFCC reference system for measurement of hemoglobin A1c in human blood and the national standardization schemes in the United States, Japan, and Sweden: A method-comparison study. Clin Chem 2004;50:166–74.
  • Chari ST. Detecting early pancreatic cancer: Problems and prospects. Semin Oncol 2007;34:284–94.
  • Kaur S, Baine MJ, Jain M, Sasson AR, Batra SK. Early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: Challenges and new developments. Biomarker Med 2012;6:597–612.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.