1,148
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Second primary malignancy in Burkitt's lymphoma

&
Pages 396-398 | Received 13 Apr 2015, Accepted 20 May 2015, Published online: 13 Jun 2015

To the Editor,

Burkitt's lymphoma is an uncommon form of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. In the US, the incidence of Burkitt's lymphoma during 2001–2009 period was 0.4 cases per 100 000 population [Citation1]. Burkitt's lymphoma constitutes 0.4% of all the lymphoid malignancies and accounting for between 40% and 50% of childhood non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHLs) in non-endemic areas [Citation2,Citation3]. The sporadic form in adults accounts for 1–2% of all adult lymphomas in western Europe and the US [Citation4].

Burkitt's lymphoma is treated with of high-intensity, short-duration combination chemotherapy. Treatment is effective with approximately 90% of pediatric patients and up to 50–60% of adults with long-term disease-free survival [Citation5–8]. The rate of second primary malignancies (SPM) in Burkitt's lymphoma patients is unknown. In this study, we analyzed the risk of SPMs in adult patients with Burkitt's lymphoma from National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database.

The SEER 13 is a population based cancer database sponsored by National Cancer Institute. SEER 13 represents 13.8% of the US population and covers the following geographical areas – San Francisco-Oakland SMSA, Connecticut, Detroit (Metropolitan), Hawaii, Iowa, New Mexico, Seattle (Puget Sound), Utah, Atlanta (Metropolitan), San Jose-Monterey, Los Angeles, Alaska Natives, and Rural Georgia.The SEER program collects comprehensive cancer data from hospitals and cancer treatment centers and maintains high quality data from defined geographical areas. It is a mature database with 98% case completeness [Citation9].

We selected Burkitt's lymphoma patients diagnosed during January 1992 to December 2011 from SEER 13 Regs Research Data, Nov 2013 Sub (1992–2011) database [Citation1]. We excluded cases diagnosed at autopsy and those who were lost to follow-up. Patients were followed up from the time of diagnosis of Burkitt's lymphoma to the date of last known vital status, death or the last point of data collection. SPM was defined as metachronous malignancy developing six months or more after an index Burkitt's lymphoma based on Warren and Gates criteria [Citation10] as modified by the NCI [Citation11].

We used the multiple primary standardized incidence ratio (MP-SIR) session of the SEER stat software version 8.1.5 March 26, 2014 for statistical analysis. We calculated the SIR, absolute excess risk (AER) and confidence interval for SPM in patients with Burkitt's lymphoma by age (0–59 years vs. 60 + years) and latency (6–23 months vs. 24 + months). The SIR is also known as the relative risk. It is a measure of the strength of association between two cancers. It is calculated by dividing the observed incidence of SPM by the expected incidence of SPM (O/E ratio) in the general population [Citation12]. AER is an absolute measure of the clinical burden of additional cancer occurrence in a given population. It measures the actual number of excess events normalized to the numbers of person years observed [AER = (O/E)/PY].

A total of 1757 patients with a diagnosis of primary Burkitt's lymphoma were reported in the SEER 13 registry during January 1992 to December 2011. The median age at diagnosis of Burkitt's lymphoma was 59 years (13–95 years) and median follow-up duration of patients was 16 months (0–147 months).

A total of 80 patients (4.55%) developed 86 second primary malignancies, with an observed/expected (O/E) ratio of 2.02 (95% confidence interval = 1.62–2.5, p < 0.05), and an AER 45.82/10 000 populations. Median age at the time of diagnosis of SPM was 63 years (13–95 years). There was significantly higher risk of anal carcinoma, thyroid malignancies, head and neck tumor, pancreatico-hepatobiliary malignancies and Kaposi sarcoma compared to the general population (). Among hematological malignancies, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and acute myeloid leukemia were significantly increased with O/E ratio of 5.11 and 22.59, respectively.

Table I. Second primary malignancies in patients with Burkitt's lymphoma.

Median latency for development of all SPM in Burkitt's lymphoma patient was 58.5 months (6–194 months). There was significantly higher risk of Kaposi sarcoma (N = 4, O/E = 125.59, p-value = < 0.05, AER = 19.33) and thyroid cancer (N = 2, O/E = 12.57, p-value = 0.02, AER = 8.97) within the first two years of latency. Excess risk was observed for anal carcinoma (N = 3, O/E = 27.20, p-value = < 0.05, AER = 3.89), breast cancer (N = 7, O/E = 2.84, p-value = 0.03, AER = 6.11), Hodgkin's lymphoma (N = 2, O/E = 8.32, p-value = 0.05, AER = 2.37), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (N = 8, O/E = 5.22, p-value = < 0.05, AER = 8.71), acute myeloid leukemia (N = 7, O/E = 25.06, p-value = < 0.05, AER = 9.05), Kaposi Sarcoma (N = 3, O/E = 36.82, p-value = < 0.05, AER = 3.93) and pancreatico-hepatobiliary carcinoma (N = 6, O/E = 3.5, p-value = 0.01, AER = 5.77) after two years of latency.

With improvement in diagnostics and therapy, the number of cancer survivors is increasing [Citation13]. It is expected that by 2022, approximately 18 million cancer survivors will be present in the US [Citation14]. Factors related to cancer, pre-existing conditions and therapeutic interventions lead to increased risk of second primary malignancies in cancer survivors [Citation15]. Improved understanding of long-term complications of cancer and its treatment is necessary to guide post-treatment surveillance of cancer patients. The 2005 IOM report recommends use of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines to identify and manage long-term effects of cancer and its treatment. Unfortunately, due to lack of high-quality evidence, there are no standardized practice guidelines for management of adult cancer survivors.

In this population-based study, we report significantly higher risk of SPMs in Burkitt's lymphoma patients. This is the first study to document the risk of SPMs in Burkitt's lymphoma patients. The risk of specific SPM depends on latency.

Strengths of our study include large sample size, high level of quality control of the SEER program, 98% case completeness. Limitations of our study are specific to population-based registry. The SEER program does not collect data on co-morbidities including HIV status, risk factors and chemotherapy used for the treatment of cancer. Similarly, a small number of recurrences in certain anatomic locations may be misclassified as SPM. Migration of patients out of a SEER geographic registry may lead to underestimation of SPM risk.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

References

  • Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (Internet). Bethesda (MD): National Cancer Institute (US), Surveillence Research Program. 2014 Apr. [cited 2015 Jan]. Available from: http://seer.cancer.gov/.
  • Wilson JF, Jenkin RD, Anderson JR, Chilcote RR, Coccia P, Exelby PR, et al. Studies on the pathology of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of childhood. I. The role of routine histopathology as a prognostic factor. A report from the Children's Cancer Study Group. Cancer 1984;53:1695–704.
  • Murphy SB, Fairclough DL, Hutchison RE, Berard CW. Non-Hodgkin's lymphomas of childhood: An analysis of the histology, staging, and response to treatment of 338 cases at a single institution. J Clin Oncol 1989;7:186–93.
  • Yustein JT, Dang CV. Biology and treatment of Burkitt's lymphoma. Curr Opin Hematol 2007;14:375–81.
  • Magrath I, Adde M, Shad A, Venzon D, Seibel N, Gootenberg J, et al. Adults and children with small noncleaved-cell lymphoma have a similar excellent outcome when treated with the same chemotherapy regimen. J Clin Oncol 1996;14:925–34.
  • Lacasce A, Howard O, Lib S, Fisher D, Weng A, Neuberg D, et al. Modified magrath regimens for adults with Burkitt and Burkitt-like lymphomas: Preserved efficacy with decreased toxicity. Leuk Lymphoma 2004;45:761–7.
  • Thomas DA, Faderl S, O’Brien S, Bueso-Ramos C, Cortes J, Garcia-Manero G, et al. Chemoimmunotherapy with hyper-CVAD plus rituximab for the treatment of adult Burkitt and Burkitt-type lymphoma or acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer 2006;106:1569–80.
  • Boué F, Gabarre J, Gisselbrecht C, Reynes J, Cheret A, Bonnet F, et al. Phase II trial of CHOP plus rituximab in patients with HIV-associated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:4123–8.
  • Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (Internet). Bethesda (MD): National Cancer Institute (US), Surveillence Research Program. 2014 Apr. [cited 2015 Jan]. Available from: http://seer.cancer.gov/data/metadata.html
  • Warren S, Gates O. Multiple primary malignant tumors: A survey of the literature and a statistical study. Am J Cancer 1932;16:1358–414.
  • Curtis RE, Ries LA. New malignancies among cancer survivors: SEER Cancer Registries, 1973–2000. In: Curtis RE, Freedman DM, Ron E, et al. Methods. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2006. p 9–14.
  • Schoenberg BS, Myers MH. Statistical methods for studying multiple primary malignant neoplasms. Cancer 1977;40(4 Suppl):1892–8.
  • Coleman MP, Forman D, Bryant H, Butler J, Coleman MP, Forman D, et al. Cancer survival in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and the UK, 1995–2007 (the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership): An analysis of population-based cancer registry data. Lancet 2011; 377:127–38.
  • Cancer Survivorship [Internet]. Atlanta (GA): Center for Disease Control and Prevention (US), National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. [cited 2015 Jan 15]. Available from http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/survivorship/pdf/survivorship_fs.pdf.
  • Aisenberg AC. Problems in Hodgkin's disease management. Blood 1999;93:761–79.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.