106
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Intensity Modulated Arc Therapy in Bilaterally Irradiated Head and Neck Cancer: A Comparative and Prospective Multicenter Planning Study

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 159-167 | Received 05 Feb 2013, Accepted 23 Jan 2014, Published online: 07 Mar 2014
 

Abstract

A dosimetric comparison was made of Helical Tomotherapy (HT) and Rapid'Arc® (RA) in 115 patients with head and neck carcinoma included in a prospective and multicentric study. HT and RA provided highly conformal plans that easily complied with dose volume constraints for organs at risk. HT reduced high doses to the planning target volumes (PTVs) compared to RA and provided a more homogeneous dose distribution but with an increased Non Tumoral Integral Dose (NTID) than RA. However, the clinical consequences of these dosimetric advantages and disadvantages need further investigation.

Notice of Correction

Changes have been made to this article since its original online publication date of 7 March 2014.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 1,193.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.