PRIOR NIGHT SLEEP DURATION IS ASSOCIATED WITH PSYCHOMOTOR VIGILANCE IN A HEALTHY SAMPLE OF POLICE ACADEMY RECRUITS

Abstract

Aviation, military, police, and health care personnel have been particularly interested in the operational impact of sleep restriction and work schedules given the potential severe consequences of making fatigue-related errors. Most studies examining the impact of sleep loss or circadian manipulations have been conducted in controlled laboratory settings using small sample sizes. This study examined whether the relationship between prior night sleep duration and performance on the psychomotor vigilance task could be reliably detected in a field study of healthy police academy recruits. Subjects (N = 189) were medically and psychiatrically healthy. Sleep-wake activity was assessed with wrist actigraphy for 7 days. Subjects performed the psychomotor vigilance task (PVT) for 5 min on a personal digital assistant (PDA) device before and after their police academy workday and on comparable times during their days off. Mixed-effects logistic regression was used to estimate the probability of having ≥1 lapse on the PVT as a function of the previous night sleep duration during the 7 days of field testing. Valid estimates of sleep duration were obtained for 1082 nights of sleep. The probability of a lapse decreased by 3.5%/h sleep the night prior to testing. The overall probability of having a lapse decreased by 0.9%/h since awakening, holding hours of sleep constant. Perceived stress was not associated with sleep duration or probability of performance lapse. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of detecting sleep and circadian effects on cognitive performance in large field studies. These findings have implications regarding the daytime functioning of police officers. (Author correspondence: [email protected])

Keywords:

• Circadian rhythm/physiology
• Cognitive performance
• Intrinsic alertness
• Police
• Reaction time
• Sleep deprivation/complications
• Vigilance

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (C.R.M.: MH56350; T.C.N.: MH73978).

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.