498
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The impact of introducing automated eGFR reporting on uncovering new cases of chronic kidney disease in a University Hospital in Saudi Arabia

, , , , , & show all
Pages 1278-1280 | Received 01 Apr 2013, Accepted 27 Jun 2013, Published online: 07 Aug 2013

Abstract

Objective: To determine the impact of introducing eGFR automated reporting on uncovering new cases of Chronic Kidney Disease. Methods: All serum creatinine (SCr) in adult patients attending outpatient clinics over a two-month period were recorded and eGFR estimated. Cases with a SCr within normal limits but were in CKD stage 3 (<60 mL/min) or higher were recorded and their numbers, percentages and mean ages calculated. Stages 1 and 2 were excluded from analysis because urinary albumin and other urinary abnormalities were not checked. Results: A total of 26,422 SCr from different patients were included. The mean SCr was 92.5 ± 130.9 μmol/ and the mean eGFR was 99.8 ± 32.4 mL/min/1.73 m2. Of all the10,601 males with normal SCr, 0.84% were in CKD stage 3 and in all the 14,695 female, 19.24% were in stage 2 in stage. Of all the 14,695 females with serum creatinine in the normal range, 200 (1.36%) were in CKD stage 3. The patients in stages 2 and 3 were significantly older. Conclusion: If our findings are shown to be true for the rest of Saudi Arabia, one could extrapolate that for each 100,000 serum creatinine assayed for males, 840 new cases will be uncovered in CKD stage 3. The corresponding number for females would be 1360 cases.

Introduction

Early referral of patients with CKD has been shown to delay the need for dialysis, reduce the number and duration for hospitalization, improve access to renal transplantation and reduce mortality. For new referrals with CKD stages 3–5, the rates of annual eGFR decline slowed from −7.38 before referral to −1.02 mL/min after referral (p < 0.001).Citation1,Citation2 In fact, in patients with diabetic nephropathy, an increase in eGFR was noted compared to those without diabetes (p = 0.034).Citation1

The risk of mortality increases with delay in referral.Citation3 Compared with early referral patients, late referral patients had a 44% higher risk of death at 1 year after initiation of dialysis (HR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.15–1.80).Citation4 Early referral patients stay on average 7 to 8 days in the hospital as compared to 30 to 31 days for late referral patients.Citation5,Citation6 Moreover, late referral patients are less likely to be put on the waiting list for transplantation (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.59) and are less likely to be given a transplant (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.77).Citation6

Despite this overwhelming evidence of the benefit associated with early referral to a nephrologist, late referrals remain common (in the range of 15–50% of all the cases).Citation7,Citation8 We reported this to be as high as 60% in Saudi Arabia.Citation9

To facilitate and encourage early referral, national and international bodies recommended that renal function is reported by laboratories as eGFR using MDRD formulaCitation10 and that the patient is referred when eGFR is <60 mL/min.Citation11

Unrecognized CKD is quite common. Kidney early evaluation program (KEEP), run by the National Kidney Foundation, showed that the prevalence of eGFR of <60 mL/min when screening high-risk individuals was 20.8%Citation12 and in the general population screening (“NHANES III” study) was 4.7%.Citation13 It was similarly reported to be between 4.6% and 5.7% in several European countries.Citation14–16

The patient with early stage CKD is 5 to 10 times more likely to die from a cardiovascular event than progress to ESRD.Citation17

No previous study was done in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to impact the introduction of eGFR automated reporting on uncovering new cases of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD).

Methods

All the serum creatinine assayed in patients attending outpatient clinics over a two-month period (November and December 2011) at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh biochemistry laboratory, were recorded and eGFR was calculated using the MDRD formula. Patients attending the renal clinics were excluded. In patients who had more than one result during that period of time, the earliest one was considered.

Serum creatinine was assayed with the use of the Jaffe procedure that produced values traceable to the isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) using the Architect 16000 chemistry analyzer (Abbott, IL).

GFR was estimated using 4-item MDRD [eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) = 186 × serum creatinine−1.154 × Age−0.203× (0.742 if female)].

All samples with a serum creatinine within normal limits for the local laboratory had their GFR estimated and their CKD status staged according the internationally accepted CKD staging into stages 3 to 5. Stages 1 and 2 were excluded from analysis because urinary albumin and other urinary abnormalities were not checked. The number, gender, percentage of the total and mean age were calculated for each stage. This study has been cleared by our Institution Ethics Review Board for human studies.

Results

A total of 26,422 patients met the criteria for inclusion in the study. These are the specimens assayed for serum creatinine over a two-month period (November and December 2011). The mean age of the whole group was 50.3 ± 16.9 years and the mean serum creatinine was 92.5 ± 130.9 μmol/L and the mean eGFR was 99.8 ± 32.4 mL/min/1.73 m2

There was a total of 10,601 males (mean age 55 years) in the group. After excluding those with serum creatinine levels above the upper limit of the laboratory for adult males (>115 μmol/L), there remained 9280 patients with a mean age of 52.8 ± 16.1 years. Among this group, the mean serum creatinine was 75.7 ± 13.3 μmol/L and the mean eGFR of 104.9 ± 23.5 mL/min/1.73 m2.

Of all the male patients with a serum creatinine level within the normal range for the laboratory for adult males, 78 were in CKD stage 3 (0.84%) (mean age of 77 years). No male patient had eGFR that fell within stage CKD 4 or 5 ().

Table 1. CKD staging of male patients with serum creatinine within the normal range.

There were 15,818 females (mean age 47.9 years). After excluding those with serum creatinine levels above the upper limit of the laboratory for adult females (>97 μmol/L), there remained 14,695 female patients [mean age of 46.8 (16.4) years]. Among these, the mean serum creatinine was 57.9 (9.2) μmol/L and mean eGFR of 108.4 (23.2) mL/min/1.73 m2

Of all the female patients with a serum creatinine level within the normal range, 200 were in CKD stage 3 (1.36%). (This group had a mean age of 70.3 years.) No female patient had eGFR that fell within stage CKD 4 or 5 ( and ).

Table 2. CKD staging of female patients with serum creatinine within the normal range.

The mean age of the male patients with eGFR <60 mL/min was 26.6 ± 10.4 years older than the male group as a whole (p = 0.001), and the mean age of the female patients with eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 was 22.4 ± 7.9 years older than the female group as a whole (p = 0.001).

Over the two-month period of sample collection, there were a total of 278 patients who had eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 but normal serum creatinine (78 males and 200 females). This amounts to a total of 139 patients per month or 1668 patients per year for King Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh.

Discussion

Serum creatinine measurement is not sensitive for detecting mild-to-moderate kidney failure and is significantly affected by age, gender and muscle mass. As such kidney function could fall by as much as 50% or more before the serum creatinine value rises above the upper limit of normal.Citation18 To overcome this, the general recommendation now is that automated eGFR reporting by used.Citation11

The general recommendations are that patients with eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 are best referred to a nephrologist.Citation11 A large number of patients whose serum creatinine levels fall within the laboratory’s normal limits would be discovered to, in fact, have eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 if their renal function is to be reported by the laboratory as eGFR using the 4-item MDRD formula. Thus the implementation this recommendation would result in larger number of patients being referred to nephrologist. One study reported that such an action could result in an increase of 19.1% following the reporting renal function as automated eGFR.Citation19

Another studyCitation20 concluded that reporting renal function using eGFR instead of serum creatinine was followed by an overall increase in the monthly referrals rates by 40%. The patients thus referred were significantly more likely to be older and have stage 3 CKD.

In our present study, we also observed that the patients that would be likely to be referred after such a reporting policy will increase by 1.36% in females if all patients with eGFR <60 mL/min is the cutline referral policy. For males, this increase would be 0.84%. The mean age of the male patients with eGFR <60mL/min was 26.6 ± 10.4 years older than the male group as a whole (p = 0.001), and the mean age of the female patients with eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 was 22.4 ± 7.9 years older than the female group as a whole (p = 0.001).

When this reporting policy was introduced in Australia in 2005, a significant increase in people who “did not attend” (DNA) the clinic appointments was noted (except in those with diabetes mellitus).Citation11

In a recent Canadian study, it was found that automated eGFR reporting was associated with a significant rise in the number of referrals and with a 33% rise in patient waiting time with older patient being referred.Citation21

Another study showed a sevenfold increase in referrals after the introduction of automated eGFR reporting system.Citation22 However, this reduced back to a rate similar to that seen in our study, following the introduction of a referral assessment service.Citation20

In conclusion, in our institution, among a total of 26,422 patients included during the two-months period, 278 of the patients whose serum creatinine fell within the normal range proved to have eGFR <60 mL/min, 78 were males and 200 females or 139 new patents every month (1668 patients per year).

If this proves true throughout Saudi Arabia, one could extrapolate that for each 100,000 serum creatinine assayed for males, 840 new cases will be uncovered who are in CKD stage 3. For 100,000 serum creatinine assayed for females, the numbers would be 1360.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

References

  • Chen SC, Chang JM, Chou MC, et al. Slowing renal function decline in chronic kidney disease patients after nephrology referral. Nephrology. 2008;13:730–736
  • Jones C, Roderick P, Harris S, Rogerson M. Decline in kidney function before and after nephrology referral and the effect on survival in moderate to advanced chronic kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006;21:2133–2143
  • Jungers P, Massy ZA, Thao Nguyen Khoa TN, et al. Longer duration of predialysis nephrological care is associated with improved long term survival of dialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2001;16:2357–2364
  • Kazmi WH, Obrador GT, Khan SS, Pereira BJ, Kasz AT. Late nephrology referral and mortality among patients with end-stage renal disease: a propensity score analysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004;19:1808–1814
  • Junger P. Late referral: loss of chance for the patient, loss of money for society. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002;17:371–375
  • Cass A, Cunningham J, Snelling P, Ayanian JZ. Late referral to a nephrologist reduces access to renal transplantation. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003;42(5):1043–1049
  • Winkelmayer WC, Glynn RJ, Levin R, Owen WF, Avorn J. Determinants of delayed nephrologist referral in patients with chronic kidney diseases. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001;38:1178–1184
  • Navaneethan SD, Kandula P, Jeevanantham V, Nally JV Jr, Liebman SE. Referral patterns of primary care physicians for chronic kidney disease in general population and geriatric patients. Clin Nephrol. 2010;73:260–267
  • Al Sayyari A, Shaheen FAM. End stage chronic kidney disease in Saudi Arabia – a rapidly changing scene. Saudi Med J. 2001;32:339–346
  • Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:461–470
  • The Australasian eGFR Working Party. Chronic kidney disease and automatic reporting of estimated glomerular filtration rate: a position statement. Med J Aust. 2005;183:138–141
  • Vassalotti JA, Li S, Chen SC, Collins AJ. Screening populations at increased risk of CKD: The Kidney Early Evaluation Program (KEEP) and the public health problem. AJKD. 2009;53:S107–S114
  • Coresh J, Astor BC, Greene T, Eknoyan G, Levey AS. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease and decreased kidney function in the adult US population: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003;41:1–12
  • Asselbergs FW, Diercks GF, Hillege HL, et al. Prevention of Renal and Vascular Endstage Disease Intervention Trial (PREVEND IT) Investigators. Effects of fosinopril and pravastatin on cardiovascular events in subjects with microalbuminuria. Circulation. 2004;110:2809–2816
  • Hallan SJ, Coresh J, Astor BC, et al. International comparison of the relationship of chronic kidney disease prevalence and ESRD risk. JASN. 2006;17:2275–2284
  • Otero A, de Francisco A, Gayoso P, García F, EPIRCE Study Group. Prevalence of chronic renal disease in Spain: results of the EPIRCE study. Nefrologia. 2010;30(1):78–86
  • Foley RN, Murray AM, Li S, et al. Chronic kidney disease and the risk for cardiovascular disease, renal replacement, and death in the United States Medicare population, 1998 to 1999. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:489–495
  • Johnson DW. Use of serum creatinine concentration to assess level of kidney function. Nephrology. 2005;10:S133–S139
  • Van Biesen W, Vanholder R, Veys N, et al. The importance of standardization of creatinine in the implementation of guidelines and recommendations for CKD: implications for CKD management programmes. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006;21:77–78
  • Noble E, Johnson DW, Gray N, et al. The impact of automated eGFR reporting and education on nephrology service referral. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008;23:3845–3850
  • Naimarka DM, Harela Z, Moineddinb R, Bergman A. The impact of estimated glomerular filtration rate reporting on nephrology referral pattern, patient characteristics and outcome. Nephron Clin Pract. 2012;121:c10–c15 (DOI: 10.1159/000341925)
  • Richards N, Harris K, Whitfield M, et al. The impact of population based identification of chronic kidney disease using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) reporting. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008;23:556–561

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.