Meta-analysis reveals PTPN22 1858C/T polymorphism confers susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis in Caucasian but not in Asian population

Abstract

The PTPN22 1858C/T polymorphism is associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, reports from the Asian populations are conflicting in nature and lacks consensus. The aim of our study was to evaluate the association between the PTPN22 1858C/T polymorphism and RA in Asian and Caucasian subjects by carrying out a meta-analysis of Asian and Caucasian data. A total of 27 205 RA cases and 27 677 controls were considered in the present meta-analysis involving eight Asian and 35 Caucasian studies. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) were performed for the allele, dominant, and recessive genetic model. No statistically significant association was found between the PTPN22 1858C/T polymorphism and risk of RA in Asian population (allele genetic model: OR = 1.217, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.99–1.496, p value 0.061; dominant genetic model: OR = 1.238, 95% CI = 0.982–1.562, p value 0.071; recessive genetic model: OR = 1.964, 95% CI = 0.678–5.693, p value 0.213). A significant association with risk of RA in Caucasian population suggesting that T–– allele does confer susceptibility to RA in this subgroup was observed (allele genetic model: OR = 1.638, 95% CI = 1.574–1.705, p value < 0.0001; dominant genetic model: OR = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.598–1.745, p value < 0.0001; recessive genetic model: OR = 2.65, 95% CI = 2.273–3.089, p value < 0.0001). The PTPN22 1858C/T polymorphism is not associated with RA risk in Asian populations. However, our meta-analysis confirms that the PTPN22 1858C/T polymorphism is associated with RA susceptibility in Caucasians.

Keywords:

• Genetic model
• meta-analysis
• polymorphism
• protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor 22
• rheumatoid arthritis

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the software related help received from the Deanship of Scientific Research, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.

Declaration of interest

The authors report that they have no conflicts of interest. No direct/indirect funding was available for this study.