418
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Editorial

Is the International Eye Care Community Blind to Couching?

Pages 267-268 | Received 26 Jul 2010, Accepted 26 Jul 2010, Published online: 24 Sep 2010

couch’er n. Middle English couche, from Old French culche, couche, from couchier, to lay down, lie down, from Latin collocāre(American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 2009).

Couching is an ancient practice. The coucher, literally, one who causes the crystalline lens to “lie down,” is traditionally taught the craft by those who have practiced this ancient manipulation of the human crystalline lens. Knowledge of couching techniques, both internal and ab externo, have been carefully protected, sequestered through generations of traditional healers.

Many years ago in a city in the Horn of Africa, I was invited by a trained ophthalmic health care worker to observe a coucher and his operation. I was interested because we were seeing many blinding complications of couched eyes in our clinic. When I arrived at the place where it was to be performed, the coucher refused to demonstrate his craft, possibly believing that I had the authority to stop his work.

Knowledge can be exercised as power. Power can be an incentive for material or financial gain. Thus couching persists in some of the world’s poorest societies.

But financial gain is not the only reason that this primitive atavistic procedure continues. There is adequate documentation that modern ocular surgical services in northern Nigeria and Mali are scarce, not sufficiently accessed, or both.Citation1,Citation2,Citation3

The lead article in this issue of Ophthalmic Epidemiology, Couching in Nigeria: prevalence, risk factors and visual acuity outcomes (Gilbert, Murthy, Selvaraj et al.) documents the harmful and blinding results of couching in a population-based study.

In this well designed prevalence survey, 15,373 people were randomly enumerated and 13,582 were interviewed and examined. Nearly 43% of eyes in that survey that had undergone cataract surgery had been couched (249 of 585). None were wearing aphakic correction, and 56% of people who presented and 73% of eyes were blind by the World Health Organization definition (visual acuity <3.60). Even after refraction and visual acuities were re-measured with aphakic correction, 43% of eyes remained blind by the same definition.

Couching and its attendant complications are well knownCitation4 and are familiar to many who have worked in some of the world’s poorest countries. Couching is by no means limited to Nigeria.Citation5 Its practice is widespread geographically, but to what extent has yet to be determined because it is shrouded in secrecy. The cumulative contribution to ocular morbidity, pain, suffering, low vision and blindness is unknown.

This important paper articulates the need for comprehensive and sustained action to educate, advocate, and implement goals of Vision 2020 to reduce the prevalence rate of blindness and low vision from cataract.

IS THE INTERNATIONAL EYE CARE COMMUNITY BLIND TO COUCHING?

Those health care planners and practitioners who believe couching is extinct should take intelligent note of this scientific article. The take away message is a clarion call to increase practical, effective and safe surgery to the underserved cataract blind community.

REFERENCES

  • Mpyet C, Dineen BP, Solomon AW. Cataract surgical coverage and barriers to uptake of cataract surgery in leprosy villages of north eastern Nigeria. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89(8):936–988.
  • Rabiu MM, Muhammed N. Rapid assessment of cataract surgical services in Birnin-Kebbi local government area of Kebbi State, Nigeria. Ophthal Epidemiol. 2008;15(6):359–365.
  • Schemann JF, Bakayoko S, Coulibaly S. Traditional couching is not an effective alternative procedure for cataract surgery in Mali. Ophthal Epidemiol. 2000;7(4):271–283.
  • Swan HT. An ancient record of couching for cataract. Journal of Social Medicine. 1995;88(4):208–211.
  • Siddig A. Complications of couching and visual outcome after IOL implantation: A study of sixty patients in Sudan. Sudan Journal Ophth. 2009;(1)1.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.