262
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Medically Assisted Procreation

Are all human-derived follicle-stimulating hormone products the same? A systematic review and meta-analysis using direct and adjusted indirect analyses, to determine whether Fostimon® is more efficient than Metrodin-HP®

&
Pages 94-101 | Received 14 Feb 2011, Accepted 02 Mar 2011, Published online: 19 May 2011
 

Abstract

Background. Randomized trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews have challenged the claim for superiority of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (recFSH) compared with human-derived FSH (hFSH). Even so, much of the evidence comes from unavailable products. If the efficacy of the currently available Fostimon® is superior, the off-market Metrodin-HP®, then data from the latter should not be used, gauge of the former.

Methods. Electronic/hand searches were performed to identify RCTs comparing Fostimon® vs. Metrodin-HP® or either product with recFSH. Primary outcomes were live-birth rate (LBR), ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR), and OPR/LBR. Secondary outcomes were clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), multiple pregnancy rate (MPR), ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), abortion rates, and cycle demographics. Data were extracted, allowed for an intention-to-treat analysis, and meta-analyzed using combined direct/adjusted indirect methods.

Results. Twenty-two RCTs met the inclusion criteria: Fostimon® vs. Metrodin-HP® (n = 2); Fostimon® vs. recFSH (n = 8); and Metrodin-HP® vs. recFSH (n = 12). LBR (odds ratio = 1.72; 95% confidence interval = 1.05–2.80), OPR/LBR, and CPR were all significantly higher favoring Fostimon®. OPR, MPR, OHSS, and miscarriage rates were not significantly different. Pooled results for cycle demographics were not reported due to high heterogeneity.

Conclusions. Fostimon® is superior to Metrodin-HP® regarding clinical outcomes. Therefore, care should be taken not to assume that all hFSH products have the same efficacy.

Acknowledgements

The authors kindly acknowledge IBSA International for the financial support of this study. There was no influence from the sponsors on the outcomes of this study.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.