![Sample our Bioscience journals, sign in here to start your access, Latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5925/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Bioscience.jpg"})
Abstract
Adenosine 5′-diphosphate (ADP) inducible aggregation is used to assess platelet response to thienopyridines. Thrombin receptor-activating peptide-6 (TRAP-6) inducible aggregation may serve as a positive control because it acts via the thrombin receptor protease-activating receptor-1, which is not blocked by thienopyridines. We therefore investigated if TRAP-6 is suitable as a positive control when assessing residual platelet reactivity to ADP. Platelet response to clopidogrel was assessed in 200 patients on dual antiplatelet therapy using ADP inducible platelet aggregation by light transmission aggregometry (LTA), multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA), and the shear-dependent Impact-R. Test specificities were monitored by TRAP-6 inducible platelet aggregation. The aggregation-independent vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation assay served for comparisons. ADP inducible aggregation was correlated to that by TRAP-6 (r = 0.33 to 0.72; p < 0.001 for all assays). A linear correlation was seen within MEA (r = 0.72). LTA TRAP-6 correlated weakly with the VASP assay (r = 0.19; p = 0.01), while there were no correlations of TRAP-6 responses by MEA or the Impact-R with the VASP assay (r = 0.03 and −0.09; p > 0.05). In all three assays, differences between ADP and TRAP-6 inducible aggregation varied considerably. Within MEA, TRAP-6 inducible aggregation was almost always stronger than ADP inducible aggregation, while within LTA and the Impact-R, weak responses to ADP were associated with both, weak and strong responses to TRAP-6. In conclusion, the application of TRAP-6 as a positive control for platelet reactivity has major limitations and results need to be cautiously interpreted on an individual basis.