270
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Somatic symptoms in primary care and psychological comorbidities in Qatar: Neglected burden of disease

, , &
Pages 100-106 | Received 03 Sep 2012, Accepted 13 Sep 2012, Published online: 06 Feb 2013
 

Abstract

Although somatic complains are the predominant reasons for seeking general medical care, there has been limited research on the clinical presentation of somatic symptoms in primary care settings in developing countries. The frequency of somatic symptoms in primary care in Qatar and its relationship to comorbidities of mental disorders is presented here. A total of 2,320 Arab patients were approached, of whom 76% agreed to participate for the survey conducted among primary healthcare (PHC) centre patients. The study was conducted with the help of general practitioners (GPs), using the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-8 for depression, the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD)-7 for anxiety, PHQ-15 for somatic symptoms and the Psychological Stress Measure (PSM)-9 for stress. Of the subjects with somatic symptoms (229 cases), most were Qataris (57.2%). Poor hearing (52.1%), palpitation (47.1%) and stomach pain (43.8%) were the most common in men, whereas constipation (54.6%), feeling depressed (50.9%), and poor hearing (50.6%) were the most common in women; 48.5% had more than four somatic symptoms. Somatic symptoms were severe in 31.9%. Somatic symptoms were associated with depression (15.3%), anxiety (8.7%) and stress disorders (19.2%). The study findings revealed that somatic symptoms were significantly associated with socio-economic status. Somatic symptoms were significantly associated with depression, anxiety and stress disorders.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank the Hamad Medical Corporation for their support and ethical approval (HMC RP#11029/11).

Declaration of interest: This work was supported and funded by the Qatar Foundation, grant no. UREP 09-045-3-007. The sponsor of the study had no role in study design, in the collection, analysis or interpretation of data; in the writing of this report, or in the decision to submit the paper for publication. A.B. and E.E.D. designed and supervised the study and were involved in data collection, statistical analysis, and the writing of the manuscript. Co-authors S.K.C. and D.B. were involved in interpretation of data and review of the manuscript. All authors approved the final version. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 770.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.