335
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers

Use of complementary and alternative medicine among US adults with and without functional limitations

, , &
Pages 128-135 | Received 27 Oct 2010, Accepted 24 May 2011, Published online: 30 Sep 2011
 

Abstract

Purpose. This study characterizes the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) among adults with and without functional limitations. We also examine the reasons for using CAM and for disclosing its use to conventional medical professionals. Methods. Data were obtained from the 2007 adult CAM supplement and components of the National Health Interview Survey (n = 20,710). Results. Adults with functional limitations used CAM more frequently than those without (48.7% vs. 35.4%; p < 0.001). Adults with functional limitations used mind–body therapies the most (27.4%) and alternative medical systems the least (4.8%). Relaxation techniques were the most common therapy used by adults with functional limitations, and they used it more often than those without limitations (24.6% vs. 13.7%; P < 0.001). More than half of the adults with functional limitations (51.3%) discussed CAM use with conventional medical professionals, compared with 37.9% of adults without limitations (p < 0.001). The main reason for CAM use was general wellness/disease prevention among adults with and without functional limitations (59.8% vs. 63.1%; P = 0.051). Conclusions. CAM use among adults with functional limitations is high. Health practitioners should screen for and discuss the safety and efficacy of CAM when providing health care.

Implications for Rehabilitation

  • Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is often used for overall health, disease prevention, and to supplement conventional medical treatment.

  • While most adults used CAM on the recommendation of friends and family, one-third of adults with functional limitations (FLs) reported CAM use recommended by a health care provider.

  • This study found that ~50% of adults with FLs discussed their CAM use with a health care provider.

  • Open discussion of CAM use and its safety and efficacy is vital.

Acknowledgments

The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no declarations of interest.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 374.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.