2,704
Views
63
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Perspectives in Rehabilitation

Rehabilitation following cancer treatment

, , , , &
Pages 2245-2258 | Received 20 Sep 2012, Accepted 05 Feb 2013, Published online: 15 Mar 2013
 

Abstract

Purpose: Cancer survivorship is increasing. However, life-saving treatments often leave people with physical, cognitive and emotional sequelae that contribute to activity and participation limitations. The purpose of this review is to summarize current evidence regarding rehabilitation interventions to address problems during survivorship. Method: Best evidence synthesis. The review took as its starting point a systematic review of patient needs and supportive care interventions following cancer treatment. The study team identified the needs which could be addressed by rehabilitation and suggested others not originally included. Then they built on the earlier review’s conclusions regarding effective intervention through extraction of results from subsequent systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials. Results: Evidence regarding the effectiveness of potential rehabilitation interventions was reviewed for physical functioning, fatigue, pain, sexual functioning, cognitive functioning, depression, employment, nutrition and participation. With the exception of physical rehabilitation interventions following breast cancer, this literature tends to focus on psychoeducational interventions, which have demonstrated limited effectiveness for rehabilitation outcomes. Conclusions: Most of the knowledge available regarding potential rehabilitation interventions comes from psychosocial oncology literature. While there are limitations, this literature provides an excellent starting point to examine the potential effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions within cancer survivorship programs.

    Implications for Rehabilitation

  • Good evidence exists for the use of exercise/physical rehabilitation in reducing fatigue after treatment for most cancers, and improving upper extremity functioning following treatment for breast cancer.

  • Preliminary evidence exists in a number of areas that may be improved by rehabilitation interventions, such as pain, sexual functioning, cognitive functioning and return to work, but further research is needed.

  • No intervention studies addressing participation limitations were identified. Rehabilitation professionals are encouraged to take the lead in exploring participation limitations among cancer survivors and developing suitable interventions.

Acknowledgements

Expert panel members were: Leila Amin, Katherine Berg, Aleksandra Chafranskaia, Oren Cheifetz, Barbara Collins, Janet Craik, Andrea Feldstain, Bruno Gagnon, Esther Green, Marlene Jacobson, Jennifer Jones, Geoff Liu, Margaret Liu, Rosemary Martino, Nancy Mayo, Neil McDonald, Deborah McLeod, Tricia Morrison, Maureen Parkinson, Stephanie Phan, Dan Pringle, Susan Rappolt, Ana Maria Rodriguez, Roanne Thomas and Margaret Tompson.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 374.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.