![Sample our Health and Social Care journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5938/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Health-Social-Care.jpg"})
Abstract
In this commentary, we critically review the contribution of the sociologist Erving Goffman (1922–1982) to understanding recovery from problem drug use. Previous research has indicated that drug users have a ‘spoiled identity’ and must restore a ‘normal’ or ‘unspoiled’ identity in order to recover. This argument has been linked to Goffman's classic work Stigma: Notes on the management of a spoiled identity [1963, Harmondsworth: Penguin]. Despite its evident appeal, linking recovery to repairing a spoiled identity has a number of problems. These include the derogatory connotations of ‘spoiled’, and the fact that the ‘momentary’ spoiled identity that Goffman likely intended is easily lost to a more ‘totalizing’ spoiled identity, from which it can be difficult for individuals to escape. Given such shortcomings, we consider how Goffman's broader dramaturgical work might contribute to our understanding of recovery processes. Dramaturgy, which focuses on the performative aspects of selfhood and the relational and situational nature of identity, suggests ways that individuals can work on their identity (and recovery) projects without over-prioritizing abstinence. We suggest that dramaturgy is more useful than the notion of repairing a spoiled identity for understanding and facilitating recovery. Nonetheless, it has limitations and other sociological perspectives provide fertile ground for future debate.
Notes
Notes
1. For present purposes, we define recovery as a process that is ‘characterized by voluntarily sustained control over substance use’ (UK Drug Policy Commission Recovery Consensus Group, Citation2008, p. 6).
2. Although we obviously appreciate that Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity is part of Goffman's dramaturgical work.
3. Scambler (Citation2009), for example, offers a very useful account of how the analysis of stigma should incorporate structural considerations and examine how macro relations of power and oppression are played out at a micro level.