367
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Salt intake and the validity of a salt intake assessment system based on a 24-h dietary recall method in pregnant Japanese women

, , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 459-462 | Received 13 Sep 2014, Accepted 07 Nov 2014, Published online: 23 Sep 2015
 

Abstract

Background: Information regarding salt intake in pregnant women in Japan is limited. An electronic system for the assessment of salt intake using a 24-h dietary recall method has been developed in Japan. The objectives of the present study were to investigate salt intake in pregnant women and to compare the salt intake estimated by the electronic salt intake assessment system with that measured by 24-h urinary salt excretion (24-hUNaCl). Methods: Data were collected on 24-hUNaCl and salt intake estimated by the salt intake assessment system for 35 pregnant Japanese women at approximately 20 weeks of gestation. The adjusted 24-hUNaCl (24-hUNaCl/[the number of urinations during the examination day – the number of missing urine collections] × the number of urinations during the examination day, g/day) was used as a standard. Results: The mean adjusted 24-hUNaCl was 7.7 ± 2.5 g/day, and mean systolic/diastolic blood pressure values were 106.1 ± 8.6/62.8 ± 6.5 mmHg. The adjusted 24-hUNaCl was significantly correlated with the salt intake estimated by the salt intake assessment system (r = 0.47, p = 0.004). Bland-Altman analysis showed no significant mean difference (adjusted 24-hUNaCl – salt intake estimated by the assessment system = −0.36 g/day, p = 0.4) and no significant proportional bias (p = 0.1). Conclusion: These results suggest that pregnant women in Japan restrict their salt intake, at least when they are being examined for salt intake. They also suggest that repeated use of the described system may be useful in estimating salt intake in pregnant women.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the staff members of this study and of Suzuki Memorial Hospital.

Declaration of interest

This work was supported by Grants for Scientific Research (24659314) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan; a Grant-in-Aid from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) fellows (25.9328); and in part by a Grant from the Sendai Knowledge Cluster Initiative, Sendai, Japan.

None of the authors declare any conflicts of interest.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.