Comparison of needlescopic and conventional video-assisted thoracic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax

Abstract

Whether the outcome of primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) when treated with needlescopic video-assisted thoracic surgery is positive is still under scrutiny. The present study was conducted to compare the needlescopic approach with the conventional approach. One-hundred and six patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax who had undergone needlescopic video-assisted thoracic surgery (NVATS) between May 2006 and August 2008 were reviewed. Their age, gender, smoking status, BMI, side of attack, operative indications, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative length of stay, postoperative pain in visual analog scale (VAS), postoperative recurrence and follow-up period were recorded. These data were compared with those of 89 patients with PSP who had undergone conventional video-assisted thoracic surgery (CVATS) between June 2002 and April 2006. The operative time was shorter (NVATS: 82.36 ± 35.58 min, CVATS: 99.78 ± 35.74 min; p = 0.008) and intraoperative blood loss was less (NVATS: 16.67 ± 25.90 ml, CVATS: 24.36 ± 26.86 ml; p = 0.04) for the NVATS group. The postoperative pain in VAS was significantly less in NVATS. No major complication or mortality was found in either group. For treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax, NVATS is a safe and effective option. Further, it has the added benefit of less pain and improved cosmetics.

Key words::

• Spontaneous
• pneumothorax
• VATS

Acknowledgment

The authors thank the help of Jadzia Chou for article revision.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.