1,743
Views
56
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

α-Terpineol reduces nociceptive behavior in mice

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 583-586 | Received 06 Sep 2010, Accepted 02 Oct 2010, Published online: 08 Mar 2011

Abstract

Context: α-Terpineol (TPN) is a monoterpenoid alcohol present in the essential oils of several species of the Eucalyptus genus (Myrtaceae).

Objective: TPN was assessed for its antinociceptive activity in rodents.

Materials and methods: The antinociceptive effect of TPN was examined using the acetic acid writhing reflex, formalin, glutamate, and capsaicin-induced nociception tests.

Results: TPN produced a significant (P < 0.01 or P < 0.001) analgesic effect by reduction at the early and late phases of paw licking and reduced the writhing reflex in mice (formalin and writhing tests, respectively). In the glutamate test, all doses of TPN produced significant (P < 0.01) nociceptive protection. When the capsaicin-induced nociception test was conducted, TPN produced dose-related inhibition of the nociceptive behavior. In addition, the results of a hot plate test showed central analgesic properties for TPN (P < 0.01 or P < 0.001). Such results were unlikely to be provoked by motor abnormality.

Conclusion: Our results suggest that TPN might represent an important tool for management and/or treatment of painful conditions.

Introduction

Monoterpenes are the main chemical constituents of the essential oils of some medicinal herbs. They are mixtures of odoriferous components obtained by steam distillation or solvent extraction from a large variety of aromatic and medicinal plants (CitationSilva et al., 2009). Besides, monoterpenes and their derivative compounds exhibit several types of pharmacological properties, such as anxiolytic (CitationSilva et al., 2007), antinociceptive (CitationMelo et al., 2010; CitationQuintans-Junior et al., 2010), and anticonvulsant (CitationDe Sousa et al., 2006, Citation2007).

α-Terpineol (TPN), a monoterpenoid alcohol, is a component of the essential oils of several species of plants (CitationDagne et al., 2000). This compound is widely used in the perfumery, cosmetic, and soap industries (CitationDe Sousa et al., 2007). Our group demonstrates that acute treatment with TPN inhibits convulsion induced by pentylenetetrazole and maximal electroshock (CitationDe Sousa et al., 2007). Additionally, CitationGolshani et al. (2004) demonstrates that essential oil of Dracocephalum kotschyi Boiss (Labiatae), rich in limonene, verbenone, α-terpineol, perillyl alcohol, and caryophyllene, possesses antinociceptive properties. However, no data exist about the possible antinociceptive activity of this isolated compound. Thus, the current investigation was carried out to evaluate the antinociceptive effect of TPN in rodents.

Material and methods

Chemical

Acetic acid and polyoxyethylene-sorbitan monolate (Tween 80) were purchased from Sigma (USA). Morphine, diazepam, and aspirin were purchased from União Química (Brazil). α-Terpineol (98% purity) was purchased from Sigma (USA).

Animals

Adult male albino Swiss mice (30–35 g) were randomly housed in appropriate cages at 21 ± 2°C with a 12/12-h light/dark cycle (light from 06:00 to 18:00), with free access to food (Purina, Brazil) and tap water. We used 6–8 animals in each group. Nociceptive tests were carried out by the same visual observer and all efforts were made to minimize the number of animals used as well as any discomfort. Experimental protocols were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee (CEPA/UFS # 26/09) at the Federal University of Sergipe.

Acetic acid writhing reflex

This study was performed according to CitationKoster et al. (1959). Mice (eight per group) were pretreated with TPN (25, 50, and 100 mg/kg), acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin 200 mg/kg), and the vehicle (saline + Tween-80 0.2%) by intraperitoneal (i.p.) route. Then, after 0.5 h, the mice received the 0.85% acetic acid injection (i.p.). The writhing was counted for 15 min after a latency period of 5 min.

Formalin-induced nociception

The procedure described by CitationHunskaar and Hole (1987) was used. Nociception was induced by injecting 20 µl of 1% formalin in distilled water in the subplantar of the right hind paw. Mice (eight per group) previously received TPN (25, 50, and 100 mg/kg, i.p.), aspirin (200 mg/ kg), and vehicle 0.5 h prior to injecting formalin. These mice were individually placed in a transparent plexiglass cage observation chamber (25 cm × 15 cm × 15 cm). The amount of time spent licking the injected paw was indicative of pain. The number of lickings from 0 to 5 min (early phase) and 15–30 min (late phase) was counted after injection of formalin (CitationHunskaar & Hole, 1987).

Glutamate- and capsaicin-induced nociception

The method used was similar to that described previously (CitationDe Souza et al., 2009). The animals were placed individually for 5 min in a transparent plexiglass cage observation chamber (25 cm × 15 cm × 15 cm) as an adaptation period. After that, 20 μmol glutamate per paw or 20 μl of capsaicin (1.6 μg/paw prepared in a phosphate-buffered solution) was injected under the skin of the dorsal surface on the right hind paw. The mice were pretreated with TPN i.p. (25, 50, and 100 mg/kg) or morphine (MOR, 3 mg/kg) 0.5 h before injection of the irritant agent (glutamate or capsaicin). The control animals received a similar volume of vehicle (10 ml/kg, i.p.). The amount of time spent licking the injected paw was timed using a chronometer and was considered indicative of nociception.

Hot plate test

The hot plate test described by CitationJacob and Ramabadran (1978) was used. The animals were placed on an aluminum plate that was adapted to a water bath at 50 ± 0.5°C. The reaction time was noted by observing either the licking of the hind paws at basal, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 h after i.p. administration of 25, 50, and 100 mg/ kg of TPN or the vehicle (saline + Tween-80 0.2%) to different groups of 10 mice. Morphine, 5 mg/kg (i.p.), was used as the reference drug. The effect of pretreatment with naloxone (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.) on the antinociception produced by CTL (100 mg/kg) and morphine (5 mg/kg, i.p.) was determined.

Evaluation of the motor activity

Initially, the mice able to remain on the Rota-rod apparatus (AVS®, Brazil) longer than 180 sec (7 rpm) were selected 24 h before the test (CitationRosland et al., 1990). Then, the selected animals were divided into five groups (n = 8, per group) and treated, i.p., with vehicle (control), TPN (25, 50, and 100 mg/ kg), and diazepam (1.5 mg/kg). Each animal was tested on the Rota-rod and the time (sec) they remained on the bar for up to 180 sec was recorded after 30, 60, and 120 min.

Statistical analysis

The obtained data were evaluated by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s test. In all cases, differences were considered significant if P < 0.05.

Results and discussion

The results of this study revealed that TPN has both peripheral and central analgesic properties. The TPN (all doses; i.p.) administered significantly inhibited (P < 0.001) the acetic acid-induced writhings and two phases of formalin-induced nociception in mice (). Those effects are probably in relationship to the inhibition in the peritoneal fluid levels of PGE2 and PGF (CitationDeraedt et al., 1980) and with the release inhibition of substance P, and other inflammatory molecules, such as serotonin, histamine, bradykinin, and prostaglandins (CitationTjølsen et al., 1992), respectively.

Table 1.  Effect of α-terpineol (TPN) or aspirin on writhing induced by acetic acid and formalin-induced nociception tests.

It is well established that glutamate is involved in the transmission of nociceptive signals from the peripheral nervous system to the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. Moreover, it has been reported that glutamate injection evoked pronounced nociceptive responses, which are mediated by neuropeptides (Substance P) releasing from C fibers and due to activation of glutamate receptors [i.e., N-methyl-d-aspartic acid (NMDA)] that can stimulate the production of a variety of intracellular second messengers, such as NO, and proinflammatory cytokines as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and IL-1β, which act synergistically in the excitation of the neurons (CitationRibas et al., 2008). Additionally, CitationBeirith et al. (2002) have found that the nociceptive response induced by glutamate appears to involve peripheral, spinal, and supraspinal sites of action and is greatly mediated by both NMDA and non-NMDA receptors. TPN produced an inhibition of the nociception induced by glutamate ().

Table 2.  Effect of α-terpineol (TPN) or morphine (MOR) on glutamate and capsaicin-induced nociception tests.

CitationSakurada et al. (2003) proposed the capsaicin-induced pain model for the study of compounds that act on pain of neurogenic origin. Capsaicin is a neurotoxic compound extracted from red pepper which, when applied to the skin or injected into animals, produces irritation, a painful reaction, and subsequent desensitization to chemically induced pain. Studies have shown that capsaicin evokes the release of neuropeptides, excitatory amino acids (glutamate and aspartate), nitric oxide (NO), and proinflammatory mediators in the periphery, and transmits nociceptive information to the spinal cord (CitationDuarte et al., 1988). CitationWaning et al. (2007) demonstrated that the capsaicin-sensitive transient receptor potential vaniloid 1 (TRPV1), which plays an important role in pain transduction, is one of the Ca+2 influx channels involved in cell migration. Our results indicate a significant reduction in neurogenic nociception caused by the intraplantar injection of capsaicin, showing that TPN caused significant effects in this test. The capsaicin-induced neurogenic paw licking response was similar to the first phase of the formalin test at TPN (all doses).

The analgesic action presented by TPN involves supraspinal as well as spinal components, as demonstrated by the utilization of the hot plate test (CitationLe Bars et al., 2001). The results suggest that TPN (at only the higher dose) has a central analgesic effect, as evidenced by the prolonged delay in response time when mice were subjected to a nociceptive stimulus during a hot plate test ().

Table 3.  Antinociceptive effect of α-terpineol (TPN) or morphine (MOR) on the hot plate test.

To investigate whether the treatments with TPN could influence the motor activity of the animals and consequently impair the assessment of the nociceptive behavior in the experimental models, the motor activity of the animals was evaluated with a Rota-rod apparatus (CitationQuintans-Júnior et al., 2010). TPN treated mice did not show any significant motor performance alterations with the doses of 25, 50, or 100 mg/kg (data not shown).

Together, these results indicate that TPN, an important monoterpene of the Eucalyptus species, might represent an important tool for treatment of pain conditions. Further studies currently in progress will enable us to understand the precise action mechanisms.

Declaration of interest

This work was supported by grants from the Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa e à Inovação Tecnológica do Estado de Sergipe/FAPITEC-SE/Brazil (grant number 019.203.00860/2009-6).

References

  • Beirith A, Santos AR, Calixto JB. (2002). Mechanisms underlying the nociception and paw oedema caused by injection of glutamate into the mouse paw. Brain Res, 924, 219–228.
  • Dagne E, Bisrat D, Alemayehu M, Worku T. (2000). Essential oils of twelve Eucalyptus species from Ethiopia. J Essent Oil Res, 12, 467–470.
  • De Sousa DP, Gonçalves JC, Quintans-Júnior L, Cruz JS, Araújo DA, de Almeida RN. (2006). Study of anticonvulsant effect of citronellol, a monoterpene alcohol, in rodents. Neurosci Lett, 401, 231–235.
  • De Sousa DP, Quintans-Júnior LJ, Almeida RN. (2007). Evolution of the anticonvulsant activity of α-terpineol. Pharm Biol, 45, 69–70.
  • De Souza MM, Pereira MA, Ardenghi JV, Mora TC, Bresciani LF, Yunes RA, Delle Monache F, Cechinel-Filho V. (2009). Filicene obtained from Adiantum cuneatum interacts with the cholinergic, dopaminergic, glutamatergic, GABAergic, and tachykinergic systems to exert antinociceptive effect in mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav, 93, 40–46.
  • Deraedt R, Jouquey S, Delevallée F, Flahaut M. (1980). Release of prostaglandins E and F in an algogenic reaction and its inhibition. Eur J Pharmacol, 61, 17–24.
  • Duarte ID, Nakamura M, Ferreira SH. (1988). Participation of the sympathetic system in acetic acid-induced writhing in mice. Braz J Med Biol Res, 21, 341–343.
  • Golshani S, Karamkhani F, Monsef-Esfehani HR, Abdollahi M. (2004). Antinociceptive effects of the essential oil of Dracocephalum kotschyi in the mouse writhing test. J Pharm Pharm Sci, 7, 76–79.
  • Hunskaar S, Hole K. (1987). The formalin test in mice: dissociation between inflammatory and non-inflammatory pain. Pain, 30, 103–114.
  • Jacob JJ, Ramabadran K. (1978). Enhancement of a nociceptive reaction by opioid antagonists in mice. Br J Pharmacol, 64, 91–98.
  • Koster R, Anderson M, Beer EJ. (1959). Acetic acid for analgesic screening. Fed Proceed, 18, 412–416.
  • Le Bars D, Gozariu M, Cadden SW. (2001). Animal models of nociception. Pharmacol Rev, 53, 597–652.
  • Melo MS, Sena LC, Barreto FJ, Bonjardim LR, Almeida JR, Lima JT, De Sousa DP, Quintans-Júnior LJ. (2010). Antinociceptive effect of citronellal in mice. Pharm Biol, 48, 411–416.
  • Quintans-Júnior LJ, Melo MS, De Sousa DP, Araujo AA, Onofre AC, Gelain DP, Gonçalves JC, Araújo DA, Almeida JR, Bonjardim LR. (2010). Antinociceptive effects of citronellal in formalin-, capsaicin-, and glutamate-induced orofacial nociception in rodents and its action on nerve excitability. J Orofac Pain, 24, 305–312.
  • Ribas CM, Meotti FC, Nascimento FP, Jacques AV, Dafre AL, Rodrigues AL, Farina M, Soldi C, Mendes BG, Pizzolatti MG, Santos AR. (2008). Antinociceptive effect of the Polygala sabulosa hydroalcoholic extract in mice: evidence for the involvement of glutamatergic receptors and cytokine pathways. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol, 103, 43–47.
  • Rosland JH, Tjølsen A, Maehle B, Hole K. (1990). The formalin test in mice: effect of formalin concentration. Pain, 42, 235–242.
  • Sakurada T, Matsumura T, Moriyama T, Sakurada C, Ueno S, Sakurada S. (2003). Differential effects of intraplantar capsazepine and ruthenium red on capsaicin-induced desensitization in mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav, 75, 115–121.
  • Silva MAG, Aquino Neto MR, Moura BA, Sousa HL, Lavor EPH, Vasconcelos PF, Macêdo DS, De Sousa DP, Vasconcelos SMM, Sousa FCF. (2009). Effects of isopulegol on pentylenetetrazol-induced convulsions in mice: Possible involvement of GABAergic system and antioxidant activity. Fitoterapia, 80, 506–513.
  • Silva MI, de Aquino Neto MR, Teixeira Neto PF, Moura BA, do Amaral JF, de Sousa DP, Vasconcelos SM, de Sousa FC. (2007). Central nervous system activity of acute administration of isopulegol in mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav, 88, 141–147.
  • Tjølsen A, Berge OG, Hunskaar S, Rosland JH, Hole K. (1992). The formalin test: An evaluation of the method. Pain, 51, 5–17.
  • Waning J, Vriens J, Owsianik G, Stüwe L, Mally S, Fabian A, Frippiat C, Nilius B, Schwab A. (2007). A novel function of capsaicin-sensitive TRPV1 channels: involvement in cell migration. Cell Calcium, 42, 17–25.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.