Abstract
We assessed the outcomes of ovarian stimulation in a two-day egg collection (EC) week with preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) cycles (N = 307) compared to a five-day EC week with conventional in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles (N = 2,417). The mean (SD) age of women undergoing PGD was 34 (3.97) and 35 (3.85) for IVF/ICSI (P < 0.001), the number of oocytes collected was 13 (7.37) and 11 (7.02), (P < 0.001), while the mean (SD) number of fertilized oocytes was 8 (5.09) and 6 (4.58), respectively (P < 0.001). The clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transfer (ET) was 37% with PGD and 38% with IVF/ICSI (P = 0.49), while the implantation rate was 0.35 and 0.30, respectively (P = 0.05). After adjusting for age and confounding variables including the number of oocytes collected and fertilized normally, the mode of treatment (PGD or IVF/ICSI) had no effect on clinical pregnancy (P = 0.48). In conclusion, scheduling of PGD cycles to a two-day EC week did not compromise the outcomes of ovarian stimulation when compared to a five-day EC week with conventional IVF/ICSI cycles. This can allow the provision of a more patient friendly service, increase the flexibility of satellite PGD services, and facilitate cycle programming with the genetics team providing PGD.
Keywords::
Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.