187
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Intrathecal hyperbaric or isobaric bupivacaine and ropivacaine with fentanyl for elective caesarean section

&
Pages 1481-1486 | Received 16 Aug 2009, Accepted 12 Jan 2010, Published online: 16 Mar 2010
 

Abstract

Objective. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of either plain or hyperbaric solutions of intrathecal bupivacaine and ropivacaine on maternal block characteristics, complications, side effects and neonatal parameters to find out which is superior in a single study.

Methods. One hundred and three term parturients were randomly assigned to receive intrathecal 10 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine (Group Bh), 10 mg plain bupivacaine (Group Bp), 15 mg hyperbaric ropivacaine prepared with dextrose 30% (Group Rh) or 15 mg plain ropivacaine (Group Rp) coadministered with fentanyl 20 μg. Sensory and motor block characteristics, analgesia duration, ephedrine consumption, and neonatal and maternal parameters were recorded.

Results. Time to maximum cephalad spread of sensory block was longer in Group Rp than both bupivacaine groups. Time to achieve sensory block at T6 dermatome was similar between both hyperbaric groups (Group Bh:4.5 ± 1.6, Group Rh:4.6 ± 1.1, p > 0.05) but Group Rp needed significantly longer time (7.5 ± 5.5 min, p = 0.003) than both hyperbaric groups. Duration of motor block was shorter in ropivacaine groups (Group Rh: 90.6 ± 17.3, Group Rp 121.6 ± 33.7) vs. bupivacaine groups (Group Bh: 140.2 ± 33.3, Group Bp: 149.7 ± 46.0); Group Rh being shorter than Group Rp (p < 0.05). Ephedrine consumption was less in Groups Rh (20.0 ± 11.9 mg) and Rp (18.3 ± 12.4 mg) vs. Groups Bh (30.0 ± 14.9 mg) and Bp (27.8 ± 15.4 mg) (p = 0.006).

Conclusions. Intrathecal hyperbaric ropivacaine 15 mg with fentanyl 20 μg for CSE is suitable since it provides early motor recovery leading to faster patient ambulation, rapid onset of sensory block with less ephedrine.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.