352
Views
25
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Skin conductance indices discriminate nociceptive responses to acute stimuli from different heel prick procedures in infants

, , , , , & show all
Pages 796-801 | Received 13 Mar 2011, Accepted 02 May 2011, Published online: 05 Jul 2011
 

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the ability of SC indexes in discriminating acute responses to different heel prick procedures. Methods: Observational cohort study of a systematic, convenience sample of neonates with clinical indication of capillary blood sampling by heel prick, either for glycaemia or for blood gas analysis. The Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS) was used to confirm the painful nature of the stimuli. NIPS assessment and SC measurement (Med-Storm Pain Monitor) were simultaneously performed by two independent observers before, during and after blood sampling. Results: Sixty-eight heel prick procedures (46 for glycaemia and 22 for blood gas analysis) were applied to 16 infants. Both NIPS scores and SC peaks/s index were significantly higher during blood sampling than before or thereafter (Wilcoxon Signed Ranks, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in NIPS score and SC peaks/s between the different heel prick procedures. Significantly higher SC area under low peaks index (Mann–Whitney, p = 0.001) and lower SC average rise time index (Mann–Whitney, p = 0.037) were registered when blood was drawn for blood gas analysis than for glycaemia, related to a sustained acute nociceptive response to a more prolonged stimulus. Conclusion: Using the conjunction of available SC indices, SC seems able to differentiate the nociceptive response to acute pain of different durations.

Declaration of interest: One of the c-authors, Hanne Storm, has a potential conflict of interest as she is part owner of Med-Storm Innovation AS, which has been developing the skin conductance equipment used in this study. All co-authors disclose any financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence (bias) this study.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.