370
Views
35
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Suspected versus non-suspected small-for-gestational age fetuses at term: perinatal outcomes

, , , &
Pages 938-943 | Received 09 Mar 2011, Accepted 13 Jun 2011, Published online: 16 Sep 2011
 

Abstract

Objective: To compare perinatal outcomes of suspected versus non-suspected small-for-gestational age fetuses (SGA) at term. Methods: Retrospective cohort study among all term singleton neonates with a birth weight <10th percentile born in the Parkstad region between 1 January 2006 and 3 March 2008. The subjects were assigned to a prenatally suspected or non-suspected SGA group. Primary outcome was adverse neonatal outcome at birth, defined as a composite of intrauterine fetal death, Apgar <7 at 5 min, or pH umbilical artery <7.05. Secondary outcome included neonatal medium care unit (NMCU) admission ≥7 days. Results: 430 subjects were included in the study; 36.7% was suspected of SGA. In the suspected SGA group mean gestational age at birth and birth weight were significantly lower, whereas maternal morbidity was significantly higher. The incidence of labor induction and elective cesarean section were also significantly higher in the suspected SGA group. Total perinatal mortality was 2.1%. Identification of SGA and subsequent management led to a significant decrease of adverse neonatal outcome at birth, but did not lead to a significant decrease in NMCU admission ≥7 days. Conclusions: Suspicion of SGA was associated with a more active management of labor and delivery, resulting in a better neonatal outcome at birth.

Acknowledgments

This research is part of a research-internship of the Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University. We thank the department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Atrium Medical Centre Heerlen for facilitating this research. We specifically wish to thank Matthijs van der Garde and Elsje Dorssers for their help during this study.

Declaration of Interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.