341
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Development of a fetal risk assessment score for the prediction of neonatal outcome in the growth-restricted fetus

Pages 1941-1944 | Received 27 Sep 2011, Accepted 22 Mar 2012, Published online: 25 Apr 2012
 

Abstract

Objective: To develop and analyze a fetal risk assessment score (FRAS) that incorporates fetal arterial and venous blood flow studies (BFS), amniotic fluid volume, the non-stress test (NST) and an estimated fetal weight to improve the ability of antenatal testing to identify fetuses at risk for poor perinatal outcome and compare it to the Biophysical Profile (BPP). Study design: The Perinatal data base of the author’s institution was searched for all patients with singleton gestation with the diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction, and who had both a biophysical profile (BPP) and fetal BFS (umbilical and middle cerebral artery, ductus venosus) within 4 days of delivery. Fetuses with major congenital abnormalities, chromosomal anomalies, or who delivered less than 25 weeks gestation were excluded. A FRAS score was developed by assigning numerical points for increasing abnormal arterial and venous BFS, and one point each for a non-reactive NST, oligohydramnios or if the fetus was small for gestational age. Recommendations for delivery were based on the clinical situation and the results of the Biophysical Profile (BPP); the FRAS score was not available to the attending physician. The FRAS was then compared to the BPP for the prediction of poor neonatal outcome (significant neonatal complications or prolonged hospital stay) using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and χ2 analysis. Results: Two hundred twenty-nine patients were included in the study. The results of the ROC analysis showed that the designed FRAS (area: 0.802) was slightly better than the BPP (area: 0.659) at predicting poor perinatal outcome in a group of growth-restricted fetuses. Conclusion: The study gives support to the hypothesis that combining biophysical tests with BFS will improve the identification of potential high-risk patients at increased risk for poor neonatal outcome, but prospective, randomized studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis.

Declaration of Interest: The author reports no conflicts of interest. The author alone is responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.