320
Views
38
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Perinatal outcomes based on the institute of medicine guidelines for weight gain in twin pregnancies

, , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 552-556 | Received 10 Mar 2013, Accepted 15 Aug 2013, Published online: 22 Oct 2013
 

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the impact of the Institute of Medicine’s (IOM) weight gain recommendations on perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies.

Methods: In this multicenter cohort study, using the 2009 IOM guidelines, we examined pregnancy outcomes in 570 uncomplicated diamniotic twin pregnancies. Subjects were grouped according to pre-pregnancy body mass index. Perinatal outcomes were assessed based on whether maternal weekly weight gain was less than, at, or in excess of the recommended IOM guidelines.

Results: In women with a normal pre-pregnancy BMI, patients whose weight gain met the IOM recommendations had a significantly higher mean gestational age at delivery; less prematurity and larger birth weight infants compared to women whose weekly weight gain was less or excess than the recommended IOM guidelines. Similarly, when compared with their low weight gain counterparts, overweight women with appropriate weight gain had improved outcomes including higher mean gestational age at delivery, higher birth weight infants and less prematurity. In obese women, the amount of pregnancy weight gain did not impact perinatal outcomes.

Conclusion: Our results confirm that weekly maternal weight gain according to the IOM guidelines results in improved outcomes in twin pregnancies. Importantly, women with a normal or overweight pre-pregnancy BMI whose weekly weight gain was less than recommended, had increased risks of prematurity and lower birth weight infants. Similarly, women with a normal pre-pregnancy BMI whose weekly weight gain was excess than recommended had increased risks of prematurity and lower birth weight infants.

Notes

*Presented at the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) 60th Annual Clinical Meeting, May 5–9, 2012, San Diego, California.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.