583
Views
28
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Litigation in obstetrics: does defensive medicine contribute to increases in cesarean delivery?

, , , , &
Pages 1668-1675 | Received 14 Oct 2013, Accepted 23 Dec 2013, Published online: 17 Feb 2014
 

Abstract

Objective: Obstetrics is one of the most sued subspecialties in the US. This study aimed to examine clinicians’ medical-legal experience and its association with recommending cesarean delivery.

Design: Cross-sectional convenience survey.

Population or sample: This is a survey study of clinicians in the US.

Methods: Survey included eight common obstetric clinical vignettes and 27 questions regarding clinicians’ practice environment. Chi-square test, multivariable logistic regression models were used for statistical comparisons.

Main outcome measures: Likelihood of recommending cesarean delivery.

Results: There were 1486 clinicians who completed the survey. Clinicians were categorized based on answers to clinical vignettes. Having had lawsuits and daily worry of suits were associated with higher likelihood of recommending cesarean, compared to those without lawsuits (17.2 versus 11.3%, respectively; p = 0.008) as was frequent worry of lawsuits (every day, 20.3% more likely; every week/month, 12.3%; few times a year/never, 11.4%, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Obstetric malpractice lawsuit and frequent worry about lawsuit are associated with higher propensity of recommending cesarean delivery in common obstetric settings.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Sanae Nakagawa for statistical programing assistance.

Contribution of authorship

YWC: performed the statistical analysis and composed the majority of this manuscript.

SH: assisted with organizing the details for conducting the survey.

JMS, IBT, AH: helped with the composition with this manuscript and provided specialty/subject-specific advises as well as knowledge regarding statistical analysis.

ABC: helped with developing the design of this research question and with editing/composition of the manuscript as well as knowledge regarding statistical analysis.

Details of ethics approval

This study was approved by the Committee on Human Research at the University of California, San Francisco on 12 February 2010.

Notes

*This paper was presented in poster format at the annual Society of Maternal-Fetal Medicine meeting in Dallas, TX on 10 February 2012.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.