1,809
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Risks and benefits of the skin-to-skin cesarean section – a retrospective cohort study

, , , , &
Pages 159-163 | Received 18 Jan 2016, Accepted 05 Mar 2016, Published online: 29 Mar 2016
 

Abstract

Objective: Comparing maternal and neonatal outcomes after conventional cesarean section (CS) versus a “natural” or “skin-to-skin” cesarean section (SSCS).

Methods: Retrospective cohort of women who underwent a SSCS (01-2013 until 12-2013) compared to conventional CS (08-2011 to 08-2012). CS before 37 weeks, under general anesthesia and in case of fetal distress were excluded. Main outcome measures were maternal blood loss, post-operative infection and admission; neonatal infection and admission; procedural outcomes.

Results: We analyzed 285 (44%) women in the SSCS-group and 365 (56%) in the conventional CS-group. There were no significant differences in surgical site infection (2.1% versus 1.6%; RR 1.1; 95%CI 0.64–2.0), or other maternal outcomes. Fewer neonates born after SSCS were admitted to the pediatric ward (9.5% versus 18%; RR 0.58; 95%CI 0.41–0.80) and fewer neonates had a suspected neonatal infection (2.0% versus 7.3%; RR 0.40; 95%CI 0.19–0.83). No differences were observed for other outcomes. Mean operation time was 4m42s longer in the SSCS-group compared to the conventional CS-group (58m versus 53m; 95%CI 2m44s–6m40s). Mean recovery time was 14m46s shorter (114m versus 129m; 95%CI 3m20s–26m).

Conclusion: Adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes were not increased after skin-to-skin cesarean compared to conventional cesarean delivery.

Acknowledgements

There are no acknowledgements to report.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Ethics Approval

Ethical approval was obtained by the Medical Ethical Committee of the Martini Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands. (MEC no. 2013-111. Date: November 2013). Informed consent was not needed by the Medical Ethical Committee as patient files were retained retrospectively and stored anonymously in the data file.

Supplementary material available online

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.