174
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The effects of reverberation on a listener's ability to recognize target sentences in the presence of up to three synchronized masking sentences

, , &
Pages 468-476 | Received 13 Jul 2010, Accepted 18 Feb 2011, Published online: 13 Jun 2011
 

Abstract

Objective: To determine the effects of room reverberation on target sentence recognition in the presence of 0-to-3 synchronous masking sentences. Design: Target and masker sentences were presented through four loudspeakers (±90° and ±45° azimuth; 1m from the listener) in rooms having reverberation times (RT) of 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, and 1.1 s. Study Sample: Four groups of 13 listeners each participated in the study (N = 52). Results: In rooms with RTs of 0.2, 0.4, and 0.6 s, mean speech recognition scores (SRSs) were similar, with scores ranging from 96–100%, 90–95%, 75–80%, and 53–60%, when 0, 1, 2, and 3 competing sentences were present, respectively. However, in the room with a RT = 1.1 s, SRSs deteriorated significantly faster as the number of competing sentences increased; mean scores were 93%, 73%, 26%, and 10%, in the 0, 1, 2, 3, competing sentence condition, respectively. The majority of errors in SRSs (98%) resulted from listeners reporting words presented in masking sentences along with those in target sentences (mixing errors). Conclusions: Results indicate that reverberation has a similar influence on SRSs measured in multi-talker environments, when room reverberation is ≤ 0.6 s. However, SRSs are dramatically reduced in the room with a RT = 1.1 s, even when only one competing talker is present.

Sumario

Objetivo: Determinar los efectos de la reverberación de un cuarto para el reconocimiento de oraciones blanco, en presencia sincrónica de 0–3 oraciones enmascarantes. Diseño: Las oraciones blanco y las enmascarantes se presentaron por medio de cuatro altoparlantes (+90° y ±45° azimuth; a 1m del oyente) en cuartos que tenían tiempos de reverberación (RT) de 0.2, 0.4, 0.6 y 1.1 seg. Muestra de estudio: Participaron en este estudio, cuatro grupos de 13 oyentes cada uno (N=52). Resultados: En cuartos con RT de 0.2, 0.4 y 0.6 seg, las puntuaciones medias de reconocimiento del habla (SRS) fueron similares, con puntuaciones que variaron de 96–100%, 90–95%, 75–80%, y 53–60%, cuando se presentaron, respectivamente, 0, 1, 2, y 3 oraciones competitivas. Sin embargo, en el cuarto con RT=1.1 seg, las SRS se deterioraron significativamente más rápido, conforme el número de frases competitivas se incrementó; las puntuaciones medias fueron de 93%, 73%, 26%, y 10%, en las condiciones de 0, 1, 2 y 3 oraciones competitivas, respectivamente. La mayoría de los errores en las SRS (98%) resultaron de oyentes que reportaron palabras presentes en las oraciones enmascarantes junto con aquellas de las oraciones blanco. (mezcla de errores). Conclusiones: Los resultados indican que la reverberación tiene una influencia similar en las SRS, medidas en ambientes de hablantes múltiples, cuando la reverberación es ≦0.6 sec. Sin embargo, las SRS se reducen dramáticamente en un cuarto con un RT=1.1 seg, incluso cuando solamente está presente un mensaje competitivo.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Mr. Tuyen Tran for designing the initial version of the custom software used in conjunction with the S3 corpus. This work was supported by the U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, USA.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 194.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.