835
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Poison Centre

Acetaminophen concentrations prior to 4 hours of ingestion: Impact on diagnostic decision-making and treatment

, , , , &
Pages 618-623 | Received 05 Dec 2014, Accepted 01 Jun 2015, Published online: 24 Jun 2015
 

Abstract

Background. Consensus recommendations for acute acetaminophen exposure include plotting an acetaminophen concentration at ≥ 4 h post ingestion on the Rumack–Matthew nomogram to determine the need for acetylcysteine treatment. We studied the frequency of acetaminophen concentrations drawn within 4 h post ingestion and whether the Rumack–Matthew nomogram was properly used in making acetylcysteine treatment decisions. Methods. This was a retrospective, observational case series at three regional poison centers of acute acetaminophen exposures between 1/1/13 and 12/31/13. Cases were analyzed for demographics, timing of acetaminophen concentrations, and application of the Rumack–Matthew nomogram in acetylcysteine initiation or termination. Results. 1,123 cases of acute acetaminophen exposure were reviewed. Of 520 acute acetaminophen exposure cases presenting < 4 h post ingestion, 323 (62%) had a pre-4-hour acetaminophen concentration measured and 197 (38%) did not. Those with a known pre-4-hour acetaminophen concentration were less likely to have a 4-hour acetaminophen concentration (59% vs. 93%) or an acetaminophen concentration within 8 h (87% vs. 99%) and were more likely to be treated with acetylcysteine (29% vs. 17%) and less likely to be treated based on the Rumack–Matthew nomogram (72% vs. 97%). Conclusions. Patients with a known exposure time and presenting within 4 h of acetaminophen ingestion had a pre-4-hour acetaminophen concentration obtained 62% of the time. Pre-4-hour acetaminophen concentrations cannot be used to determine the need for acetylcysteine therapy and are associated with an increased likelihood of not obtaining optimally timed acetaminophen concentrations and acetylcysteine management not based on the proper application of the Rumack–Matthew nomogram. Current practice results in additional cost, unnecessary treatment, potential adverse medication effects, and the possibility of non-treatment of patients at risk of hepatotoxicity.

Disclosure

This project was supported in part by the National Center for Research Resources and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health through Grant Number XX, XX Clinical and Translational Science Center.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no declarations of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 1,501.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.