Abstract
The release of Ag nanoparticles (AgNPs) into the aquatic environment is likely, but the influence of water chemistry on their impacts and fate remains unclear. Here, we characterize the bioavailability of Ag from AgNO3 and from AgNPs capped with polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP AgNP) and thiolated polyethylene glycol (PEG AgNP) in the freshwater snail, Lymnaea stagnalis, after short waterborne exposures. Results showed that water hardness, AgNP capping agents, and metal speciation affected the uptake rate of Ag from AgNPs. Comparison of the results from organisms of similar weight showed that water hardness affected the uptake of Ag from AgNPs, but not that from AgNO3. Transformation (dissolution and aggregation) of the AgNPs was also influenced by water hardness and the capping agent. Bioavailability of Ag from AgNPs was, in turn, correlated to these physical changes. Water hardness increased the aggregation of AgNPs, especially for PEG AgNPs, reducing the bioavailability of Ag from PEG AgNPs to a greater degree than from PVP AgNPs. Higher dissolved Ag concentrations were measured for the PVP AgNPs (15%) compared to PEG AgNPs (3%) in moderately hard water, enhancing Ag bioavailability of the former. Multiple drivers of bioavailability yielded differences in Ag influx between very hard and deionized water where the uptake rate constants (kuw, l g−1 d−1 ± SE) varied from 3.1 ± 0.7 to 0.2 ± 0.01 for PEG AgNPs and from 2.3 ± 0.02 to 1.3 ± 0.01 for PVP AgNPs. Modeling bioavailability of Ag from NPs revealed that Ag influx into L. stagnalis comprised uptake from the NPs themselves and from newly dissolved Ag.
Acknowledgements
Robin Stewart is thanked for manuscript review and comments.
Declaration of interest
There is no additional information to disclose.
Funding for this work was provided by the US EPA grant US-EPA-G2008-STAR-R1 Environmental Behavior, Bioavailability and Effects of Manufactured Nanomaterials awarded to the Consortium for Manufactured Nanomaterial Bioavailability and Environmental Exposure (nanoBEE). Funding was also provided from the Toxic Substances Research Program of the US Geological Survey and the National Research Program (USGS). Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the US Government.
Supplementary material available online
Supplementary Table S1-S6, Supplementary Figures S1-S14 and Supplementary Equations S1-S4