344
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Scientific Reports

Effect of BMI on modality-specific outcomes in immediate breast reconstruction (IBR)—a propensity-matched analysis using the 2005-2011 ACS-NSQIP datasets

, , &
Pages 297-304 | Accepted 17 Dec 2014, Published online: 20 Jan 2014
 

Abstract

Obesity is a prevalent, multisystem disease emerging as a pervasive risk factor for surgical morbidity. This study aims to perform a modality-specific risk assessment of IBR outcomes using the World Health Organisation (WHO) obesity stratification. This study reviewed the 2005–2011 ACS-NSQIP databases, identifying encounters for either implant or autologous-based reconstruction. Patients were classified and compared based on WHO classification criteria for BMI, and complications were divided into any surgical, major surgical, wound, and medical complications. A total of 18,194 patients underwent IBR. Patients were Caucasian (76.1%) and middle aged (45–64 years) (62.4%), with an average BMI of 27.1 ± 6.3 kg/m2. A total of 14,585 patients underwent implant-based reconstructions. A multivariate logistic regression analysis of patient characteristics associated with autologous reconstruction revealed several independently associated factors, summarised in Table III. Our analysis revealed that reconstructive modality was not statistically associated with surgical morbidity in class I obese patients (OR = 1.21, p = 0.328), but was independently associated with progressively greater odds of surgical complications in class II (OR = 1.92, CI = 1.04–3.55, p = 0.036) and class III (OR = 2.71, CI = 1.14–6.46, p = 0.024). This study characterises the modality-specific risk of surgical and medical morbidity in patients undergoing IBR across BMI-stratified cohorts. The risk-adjusted models of early morbidity in IBR reveal a significant BMI-specific risk divergence that occurs at class II obesity cohorts and above. These data serve as a useful benchmark for early, modality-specific morbidity across BMI-stratified cohorts and can be used to better tailor preoperative risk counselling in patients considering autologous reconstructions.

Acknowledgements

De-identified patient information is freely available to all institutional members who comply with the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) Data Use Agreement. The Data Use Agreement implements the protections afforded by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996. The ACS-NSQIP and the hospitals participating in the ACS-NSQIP are the source of the data used herein; they have not verified and are not responsible for the statistical validity of the data analysis or the conclusions derived by the authors of this study. This study received IRB exemption status. Level of Evidence: prognostic/risk category, level II. This particular research received no internal or external grant funding.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.