87
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Is dissection of levels 4 and 5 justified for cN0 laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer?

, , , , &
Pages 1202-1206 | Received 10 Dec 2006, Published online: 08 Jul 2009
 

Abstract

Conclusion. Dissecting levels 2 and 3 and sparing the dissection of level 4 and the contralateral neck when frozen section results are negative are reasonable options for the selective dissection of cN0necks. Our findings show that dissection of level 5 is considered unnecessary, unless there is overt metastasis. Objective. The level of node involvement and recurrence rates were assessed in cN0 laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma patients in order to develop appropriate guidelines for the treatment of the neck. Materials and methods. A total of 328 cN0necks operated with selective dissection were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were monitored for at least 24months and regional recurrences were evaluated. Results. The prevalence of level 4occult metastases was 3.4%; 1.5% of them were isolated to level 4. We observed regional recurrence in 5.6% of the necks. No case of metastasis or regional relapse was observed in level 5.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 226.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.