254
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Psychometric validation of the Growth and Empowerment Measure (GEM) applied with Indigenous Australians

(Associate Professor) , (Professor) , (Research Professor) , (Senior Research Officer) , (Professor) , (Post-Doctoral Fellow) , (Professor) & (Associate Professor) show all
Pages 791-799 | Received 11 Aug 2009, Accepted 10 Feb 2010, Published online: 03 Sep 2010
 

Abstract

Objective: Empowerment is a complex process of psychological, social, organizational and structural change. It allows individuals and groups to achieve positive growth and effectively address the social and psychological impacts of historical oppression, marginalization and disadvantage. The Growth and Empowerment Measure (GEM) was developed to measure change in dimensions of empowerment as defined and described by Aboriginal Australians who participated in the Family Well Being programme.

Method: The GEM has two components: a 14-item Emotional Empowerment Scale (EES14) and 12 Scenarios (12S). It is accompanied by the Kessler 6 Psychological Distress Scale (K6), supplemented by two questions assessing frequency of happy and angry feelings. For validation, the measure was applied with 184 Indigenous Australian participants involved in personal and/or organizational social health activities.

Results: Psychometric analyses of the new instruments support their validity and reliability and indicate two-component structures for both the EES (Self-capacity; Inner peace) and the 12S (Healing and enabling growth, Connection and purpose). Strong correlations were observed across the scales and subscales. Participants who scored higher on the newly developed scales showed lower distress on the K6, particularly when the two additional questions were included. However, exploratory factor analyses demonstrated that GEM subscales are separable from the Kessler distress measure.

Conclusion: The GEM shows promise in enabling measurement and enhancing understanding of both process and outcome of psychological and social empowerment within an Australian Indigenous context.

Acknowledgements

We thank the participants and colleagues Mary Whiteside, Vicki Saunders, Rachael Wargent, Trevor Crowe, Martin Billingham, Ernest Hunter, Jason Connor, Janya McCalman for assistance. We especially acknowledge the creators of the Family Well Being Program, the Aboriginal Education Development Branch, Office of Vocational Education and Training, South Australia.

Declaration of interest: This study was funded by the Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal Health and the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC 351582) and was associated project of the Australian Integrated Mental Health Initiative (NHMRC).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.