2,615
Views
127
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Perspectives in Rehabilitation

Engaging stakeholders in rehabilitation research: a scoping review of strategies used in partnerships and evaluation of impacts

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 1390-1400 | Received 07 Apr 2014, Accepted 05 Sep 2014, Published online: 22 Sep 2014
 

Abstract

Purpose: To describe how stakeholder engagement has been undertaken and evaluated in rehabilitation research. Methods: A scoping review of the scientific literature using five search strategies. Quantitative and qualitative analyses using extracted data. Interpretation of results was iteratively discussed within the team, which included a parent stakeholder. Results: Searches identified 101 candidate papers; 28 were read in full to assess eligibility and 19 were included in the review. People with disabilities and their families were more frequently involved compared to other stakeholders. Stakeholders were often involved in planning and evaluating service delivery. A key issue was identifying stakeholders; strategies used to support their involvement included creating committees, organizing meetings, clarifying roles and offering training. Communication, power sharing and resources influenced how stakeholders could be engaged in the research. Perceived outcomes of stakeholder engagement included the creation of partnerships, facilitating the research process and the application of the results, and empowering stakeholders. Stakeholder engagement outcomes were rarely formally evaluated. Conclusions: There is a great interest in rehabilitation to engage stakeholders in the research process. However, further evidence is needed to identify effective strategies for meaningful stakeholder engagement that leads to more useful research that positively impacts practice.

    Implications for Rehabilitation

  • Using several strategies to engage various stakeholders throughout the research process is thought to increase the quality of the research and the rehabilitation process by developing proposals and programs responding better to their needs.

  • Engagement strategies need to be better reported and evaluated in the literature.

  • Engagement facilitate uptake of research findings by increasing stakeholders’ awareness of the evidence, the resources available and their own ability to act upon a situation.

  • Factors influencing opportunities for stakeholder engagement need to be better understood.

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Peter Rosenbaum for his critical reviewing of this manuscript, as well as all our colleagues and the stakeholders with whom we have worked with to expand our knowledge around stakeholder engagement in research.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no declarations of interest. The two first authors receive post-doctoral funding support through the Fonds de Recherche du Québec – Santé (FRQ-S). The first author is also funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and the Canadian Child Health Clinician Scientist Program (CCHCSP).

Supplemental material available online

Supplemental File 1 and Supplemental File 2.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 374.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable
 

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.