![Sample our Medicine, Dentistry, Nursing & Allied Health journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5944/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Medicine-Dentistry-Nursing-Allied-Health.jpg"})
Abstract
Candidemia and invasive candidiasis (CIC) is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality, with a paucity of controlled data in neutropenic patients. A systematic review was conducted of available data for the treatment of CIC during neutropenia. A structured OVID search of multiple databases was performed. Data from randomized controlled trials of CIC and of empirical antifungal therapy in febrile neutropenic patients was included. A total of 17 trials randomizing 342 neutropenic patients were included. Eight of the studies compared amphotericin B (AmB) to other non-polyene antifungal agents. Pooling of results favored use of comparator compounds (odds ratio [OR] 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42–1.29). To strengthen our analysis, a pre-planned sensitivity analysis was also conducted. Overall, there was a non-significant benefit in favor of non-polyene compounds. Across studies, echinocandins provided the benefit of favorable outcomes with fewest side effects and toxicity.
Acknowledgement
Part of this data has been presented as a poster at the 2009 Focus on Fungal Infections Conference (Fort Meyers, Florida, USA) (Abstract P-0008).
Potential conflict of interest: Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text of this article at www.informahealthcare.com/lal.